Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences
Putri Briliantini Ananiar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Anak Saksi Yang Disumpah (Studi Putusan Nomor 20/Pid.Sus/Anak/2015/PN.Gpr) Putri Briliantini Ananiar
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2021
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Putri Briliantini Ananiar, Nurini Aprilinda, Ardi FerdianFakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya  Jl. MT. Haryono No. 169 Malangemail : putriananiar@gmail.com  AbstrakTulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis terkait kedudukan anak saksi yangdisumpah dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kabupaten Kediri No.20/Pid.Sus/Anak/2015/PN.Gpr dengan ketentuan pengaturan saksi dalam pasal 171huruf a KUHAP. Untuk menjawab tujuan tulisan tersebut, digunakan penelitianhukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undang. Hasilpenelitian tersebut menujuukan bahwa kekuatan pembuktian kedudukan keterangananak saksi pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kabupaten Kediri No.20/Pid.Sus/Anak/2015/PN.Gpr tidak sesuai dengan pasal 171 huruf a KUHAP. Danjuga keterangan dari anak saksi tidak memiliki kekuatan pembuktian, keterangananak saksi hanya bersifat menjadi petunjuk atau data pendukung sebagai keyakinanhakim dalam memutus suatu perkara.Kata kunci: Anak Saksi, Kedudukan Anak Saksi, Kekuatan Pembuktian Anak Saksidan Putusan Hakim.Abstract This paper aims to analyze the legal standing concerning child witness under oath in Decision of Kediri District Court No. 20/Pid.Sus/Anak/2015/PN.Gpr which the provisions stipulated in Article 171 Letter a of Criminal Procedure Code. In order to answer the aim of this article, normative legal research is used with a statutory approach. The results of this study indicate that the strength of proof is based on child witness testimony in the Decision of the Kediri District Court No. 20/Pid.Sus/Anak/2015/ PN.Gpr not in accordance with Article 171 Letter a of Criminal Procedure Code. Furthermore, child witness testimony does not havestrength that it only becomes a clue or supporting data for judge's conviction in deciding the case.Keywords: Child Witness, Position of Child Witness, Strength of Proof of Child Witness and Judges' Decisions.
Analysis of the Legal Implications for the Parties Based on the Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell Where There Is a Person Who IsB-Ed Putri Briliantini Ananiar; Aisyah Nur Prayekti
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i3.6361

Abstract

There is a Decision Number 3519 K/Pdt/2017 which is an appeal against the Decision of the Banda Aceh High Court numbered 43/PDT/2017/PT. The BNA, which in essence the panel of judges in the high court ruled that the Notary as defendant II was also decided by the Panel of Judges to be responsible and to be compensated along with the other defendants for the making of a Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell based on the testimony of the pretended Person. The person pretending to be someone authorized to be an obstacle in the deed, by carrying a fake Identity Card. The purpose of this study is to analyze the Legal Implications for the Parties Based on the Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell Where There Are People who pretend, through a normative juridical approach, namely regulations based on applicable laws and regulations. The results of the study provide an explanation of the decision of Cassation Number 3519 K / Pdt / 2017 which corroborates that this Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell is null and void. Thus, the aforesaid deed of power of attorney is no longer binding on the parties therein, all the powers and rights and obligations born out of the aforementioned grant of power are considered to have never existed and are binding on the parties (the person who claimed to be Z. Ahmad Nyak Cut and defendant I). in addition, there are other legal implications for the creation of a deed of power of attorney for sale in which there is a person who pretends, then according to one of the parties to the agreement, may apply for cancellation if it is found that the incompetence of the parties to the agreement. 
Co-Authors Aisyah Nur Prayekti