Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI
Muhammad Yusuf Siregar
Universitas Labuhanbatu
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN (Study Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat No. No.487/Pdt.G/2020/PA-RAP Jo Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan No.73/Pdt.G/2020/PTA-MDN) Muhammad Yusuf Siregar
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v8i2.1854

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Courts (Study of Rantauprapat Religious Court Decision No. 487 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PA-RAP Jo Medan High Court Decision No. 73 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PTA-MDN. This research is Normative Empirical, which is research by looking at conditions in the field by linking the source of laws and regulations in force in the Republic of Indonesia. The benefits that will be received from the results of this study are to find out and analyzing the legal position of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts and To find out and analyze the Implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts in the Rantauprapat Religious Court Decision No.487 / Pdt .G / 2020 / PA-RAP Jo Medan High Court Decision No.73 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PTA-MDN. The results of the research show that the provisions of the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2008 and / or Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts in article 02 paragraph 04 states that "Judges in consideration of the decision of a case must state that the case concerned has strived for peace through Mediation by stating the name of the Mediator for the case concerned. The position of Mediation as stated in the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 is one of the steps that must be taken in carrying out the Judicial system which is based on the decision of the Medan High Court Panel of Judges declaring that to completely reject the Plaintiff's Lawsuit with the Consideration that the case has been taken through the Mediation route although not maximally and His legal consideration is that the position of the witnesses presented by the Plaintiff is a witness who did not see the Plaintiff and Defendant fighting, but only told the story of the Plaintiff. Keywords: Implementation, Procedure, Mediation
KEDUDUKAN DAN STATUS HUKUM TERDAKWA PASCA PUTUSAN MAJELIS HAKIM YANG MENYATAKAN DAKWAAN JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM KABUR (Study Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Rantauprapat No. 763/Pid.B/2020/PN-RAP ) Muhammad Yusuf Siregar
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 9, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v9i2.2188

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the Position and Legal Status of the Defendant After the Decision of the Panel of Judges Declaring the Indictment of the Public Prosecutor Fleeing (Study of Decision of the Rantauprapat District Court No. 763/Pid.B/2020/PN-RAP). This research is Normative Empirical, namely research by looking at the conditions in the field by linking the legal sources of the regulations in force in the Republic of Indonesia. The benefits that will be received from the results of this study are to find out and analyze the position of the indictment which was declared vague and null and void as well as to find out and analyze the status and legal position of the defendant after the decision of the panel of judges which stated that the indictment of the public prosecutor was blurred in the Rantauprapat District Court Decision No. 763/Pid.B/2020/PN-RAP. The results of the study show that first, the position of the indictment which was declared vague and null and void in the Rantauprapat District Court Decision No. 763/Pid.B/2020/PN-RAP. 763/Pid.B/2020/PN-RAP is that based on the description of the first indictment, the Public Prosecutor mentions Iwan (not yet caught) but in the case file there is no letter or letter attachment from the Police in the form of Iwan being included in the People's Wanted List (DPO) because Therefore, the description of the Second Indictment of the Public Prosecutor is blurred so that based on the considerations above, the alternative indictment of the First Public Prosecutor is inaccurate and vague because it does not meet the requirements as referred to in Article 143 paragraph (2) letter b of the Criminal Procedure Code whose legal consequences are the alternative indictment of the First Public Prosecutor. null and void. Second, that from the series of legal processes mentioned above, it can be seen that even though at the district court level it was stated that the First and Second Indictments of the Public Prosecutor were null and void, but because the public prosecutor had filed an appeal with the decision ordered the Rantau Prapat District Court to continue the examination of this case until the final decision, the position of the defendant is still on trial and based on the final decision has sentenced the defendant to a sentence of 8 (eight) months imprisonment. Keywords: Legal Status, Indictment, Public Prosecutor.
HAK MUT’AH DAN NAFKAH IDDAH DALAM PERKARA CERAI GUGAT (Study Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat) muhammad yusuf siregar
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v10i2.2709

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalis aspek hukum  HAK MUT’AH DAN NAFKAH IDDAH DALAM PERKARA CERAI GUGAT (Study Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat). Penelitian ini bersifat Normatif Empiris yakni penelitian dengan melihat kondisi yang ada dilapangan dengan mengkaitkan sumber hukum peraturan - peraturan yang berlaku di Negara Republik Indonesia. Manfaat yang akan diterima dari hasil penelitian ini adalah  untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan hukum tentang  pemberian hak mut’ah dan nafkah iddah dalam perkara cerai gugat serta Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis praktek hukum tentang hak mut’ah dan nafkah iddah dalam perkara cerai gugat di Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) tidak memberikan pengaturan mengenai hak mut`ah, memberi nafkah iddah, maskan dan kiswah kepada bekas isteri selama dalam iddah dalam perkara cerai gugat (perceraian atas kehendak / pengajuan istri), kedua, pada praktek hukum tentang Pemberian Hak Mut’ah Dan Nafkah Iddah Dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat di Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat salah satunya berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat Nomor: 1152/Pdt.G/2020/PA-RAP  yang mana didalam putusan tersebut memberikan kewajiban kepada suaminya memberikan hak mut`ah, memberi nafkah iddah, maskan dan kiswah kepada bekas isteri selama dalam iddah.Kata Kunci : Hak Mut’ah,  Nafkah Iddah ,  Cerai Gugat.  .
Co-Authors