Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Borneo Administrator: Media Pengembangan Paradigma dan Inovasi Sistem Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi
Suripto Suripto
Departemen Manajemen Dan Kebijakan Publik Universitas Gadjah Mada
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Indigeneous Public Administration: A Review and Deconstruction of the Idea, Concept, and Theory of Government and Governance Suripto Suripto; Torontuan Yeremias Keban; Sri Harjanto Adi Pamungkas
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 17 No 3 (2021): December 2021
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v17i3.932

Abstract

Indigenous Public Administration (IPA) has attracted researchers' attention and awareness of the importance of developing contextual theory and practice of public administration, especially in developing countries such as Indonesia. IPA emerges in many developing countries since the concept, theory and practice of Western Public Administration (WPA) have failed to respond to local issues, and therefore WPA practice is considered irrelevant. Basically, IPA is a constructed concept to fill a vacant space that unoccupied by Western Public Administration (WPA). This descriptive qualitative study aims to explain and criticize the theory and practice of IPA and WPA. The data were gathered from books, journals, institution reports, regulations and other relevant writings of organizations, professionals, and academicians. The technique of data analysis was based on a data analysis spiral. It reveals that IPA applies to countries such as Indonesia and China. In both countries, the practice of IPA helps to overcome public issues concerning social, economic, and political. It is expected that the findings of this study will pave the way for developing both concept and theory of IPA and responding to more complex society and government's demands and needs.
The Political Process of Bureaucratic Reform: Wonosobo Regional Government Experience from 2011-2015 I Made Krisnajaya; Suripto Suripto; Novi Paramita Dewi; Ambar Teguh Sulistiyani; Lutfi Untung Angga Laksana
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.42589

Abstract

This study examines the political process of bureaucratic reform in Wonosobo regional government from 2011-2015. The article uses political and bureaucratic frameworks to describe the interplay of bureaucrats and politicians in the phases of bureaucratic reform. Data collection for this study employed document review and in-depth interviews with key informants. Results of the study show that the political process of bureaucratic reform mainly involved dialectical interactions between actors in the Wonosobo Regional Government and the Regional House of Representatives. The interplay of actors can then be explained through the actors’ configuration, issues that are confronted by the actors, conflicts of interest between actors, and influence tactics used by actors in managing issues and struggling for their interests. The experience of the Wonosobo regional government shows that bureaucratic reform does not only concern technical and administrative capacities in carrying out institutional arrangement, but it also involves political aspects namely visionary leadership, strong political will to conduct reform, and effective use of influential tactics to gain political supports for the reform.  
Indigeneous Public Administration: Melihat Administrasi Publik dari Perspektif Kearifan Lokal (Local Wisdom) Boni Saputra; Suripto Suripto; Yulvia Chrisdiana
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 15, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v15i2.180

Abstract

ABSTRACTGlobal transformation is always demands a good governance system and one of the functions that must be run is public administration’s system.  The impact of powerfull globalization stream, should be anticipated as well as possible.  Public Administration with the values of western modernity that developed today, sometimes make us glare about the progress and forget the values’s identity of local wisdom that we have.  Whereas, Public Administration that appropriate with the local wisdom will be no less great than western Public Administration’s model.  This paper critically discusses the concept of public administration based on local wisdom (Indigenous) and tried to critize the western of public administration’s models which has been predicated in practice and viewed as the core study of contemporary public administration in various country, including Indonesia.  A review and reconstruction of ideas, concepts and theories on Government and Governance.  The main issues is that it is not always the western model administrative practice was able to solve the problem of public administration and was successfully implemented in various regions in responding the local culture.Keywords: Public Administration, Local Wisdom, Indigenious ABSTRAK Transformasi global senantiasa menuntut adanya sistem pemerintahan yang baik (good governance) dan salah satu fungsi yang harus dijalankan adalah sistem administrasi publik. Dampak dari arus globalisasi yang sedemikian kuat, sudah seharusnya diantisipasi sebaik mungkin. Dimana administrasi publik dengan nilai-nilai modernitas model barat (western) yang berkembang saat ini, terkadang membuat kita silau akan kemajuan sehingga melupakan identitas nilai-nilai kearifan lokal yang kita miliki. Padahal administrasi publik yang beridentitas sesuai dengan nilai-nilai kearifan lokal tak akan kalah hebatnya jika dibanding dengan administrasi publik model barat. Paper ini secara kritis mendiskusikan tentang konsep administrasi publik yang berbasis kearifan lokal yang lebih bersifat indigenous dan mencoba mengkritik administrasi publik model barat yang selama ini digadang-gadangkan dalam praktik dan dipandang sebagai core studi dari administrasi publik kontemporer diberbagai negara termasuk di Indonesia. Sebuah pengkajian ulang dan pendeskonstruksian ide, konsep dan teori terhadap Government dan Governance. Thesis utamanya adalah bahwa tidak selamanya praktik administrasi model barat mampu menyelesaikan masalah administrasi publik dan berhasil dilaksanakan diberbagai daerah dalam merespon budaya lokal.Kata Kunci: Administrasi Publik, Kearifan Lokal, Indigenous
Indigeneous Public Administration: Melihat Administrasi Publik dari Perspektif Kearifan Lokal (Local Wisdom) Boni Saputra; Suripto Suripto; Yulvia Chrisdiana
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v15i2.180

Abstract

ABSTRACTGlobal transformation is always demands a good governance system and one of the functions that must be run is public administration’s system.  The impact of powerfull globalization stream, should be anticipated as well as possible.  Public Administration with the values of western modernity that developed today, sometimes make us glare about the progress and forget the values’s identity of local wisdom that we have.  Whereas, Public Administration that appropriate with the local wisdom will be no less great than western Public Administration’s model.  This paper critically discusses the concept of public administration based on local wisdom (Indigenous) and tried to critize the western of public administration’s models which has been predicated in practice and viewed as the core study of contemporary public administration in various country, including Indonesia.  A review and reconstruction of ideas, concepts and theories on Government and Governance.  The main issues is that it is not always the western model administrative practice was able to solve the problem of public administration and was successfully implemented in various regions in responding the local culture.Keywords: Public Administration, Local Wisdom, Indigenious ABSTRAK Transformasi global senantiasa menuntut adanya sistem pemerintahan yang baik (good governance) dan salah satu fungsi yang harus dijalankan adalah sistem administrasi publik. Dampak dari arus globalisasi yang sedemikian kuat, sudah seharusnya diantisipasi sebaik mungkin. Dimana administrasi publik dengan nilai-nilai modernitas model barat (western) yang berkembang saat ini, terkadang membuat kita silau akan kemajuan sehingga melupakan identitas nilai-nilai kearifan lokal yang kita miliki. Padahal administrasi publik yang beridentitas sesuai dengan nilai-nilai kearifan lokal tak akan kalah hebatnya jika dibanding dengan administrasi publik model barat. Paper ini secara kritis mendiskusikan tentang konsep administrasi publik yang berbasis kearifan lokal yang lebih bersifat indigenous dan mencoba mengkritik administrasi publik model barat yang selama ini digadang-gadangkan dalam praktik dan dipandang sebagai core studi dari administrasi publik kontemporer diberbagai negara termasuk di Indonesia. Sebuah pengkajian ulang dan pendeskonstruksian ide, konsep dan teori terhadap Government dan Governance. Thesis utamanya adalah bahwa tidak selamanya praktik administrasi model barat mampu menyelesaikan masalah administrasi publik dan berhasil dilaksanakan diberbagai daerah dalam merespon budaya lokal.Kata Kunci: Administrasi Publik, Kearifan Lokal, Indigenous
Co-Authors Ambar Teguh Sulistiyani Boni Saputra I Made Krisnajaya Lutfi Untung Angga Laksana Novi Paramita Dewi Sri Harjanto Adi Pamungkas Torontuan Yeremias Keban Yulvia Chrisdiana