Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Enrichment : Journal of Management
dwi hidayati
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Mathematics

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Hidayati, Dwi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (308.095 KB)

Abstract

Abstract. The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from student learning creativity. The learning models compared were problem based learning, group investigation and think pair share. This research used the quasi-experimental research method. The population of the research was all of the students in Grade VIII of Junior Secondary Schools of Banyumas Regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of research consisted of 295 students. Techniques of collecting data used were documentation, test, and questionnaire. Balance test used one way ANOVA test. From the research, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Learning model of PBL gave better mathematics learning achievement than model of GI and TPS, model of GI gave better mathematics learning achievement than model of TPS, (2) students who have high creativity gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have medium and low creativity, students who have medium creativity gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have low creativity, (3) in the students with high and low creativity, the GI learning model gave the same learning achievement in mathematics with the PBL and TPS learning model, the PBL learning model gave better learning achievement in mathematics the TPS learning model. The PBL, GI and TPS learning model gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, (4) in the PBL and GI learning model, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with high creativity were better than the students with medium and low creativity, the students with medium and low creativity gave same the learning achievement in mathematics. In the TPS learning model, the students with high and medium creativity gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high and medium creativity were better than the students the low creativity.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Group Investigation, Think Pair Share, Student Learning Creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Hidayati, Dwi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from student learning creativity. The learning models compared were problem based learning, group investigation and think pair share. This research used the quasi-experimental research method. The population of the research was all of the students in Grade VIII of Junior Secondary Schools of Banyumas Regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of research consisted of 295 students. Techniques of collecting data used were documentation, test, and questionnaire. Balance test used one way ANOVA test. From the research, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Learning model of PBL gave better mathematics learning achievement than model of GI and TPS, model of GI gave better mathematics learning achievement than model of TPS, (2) students who have high creativity gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have medium and low creativity, students who have medium creativity gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have low creativity, (3) in the students with high and low creativity, the GI learning model gave the same learning achievement in mathematics with the PBL and TPS learning model, the PBL learning model gave better learning achievement in mathematics the TPS learning model. The PBL, GI and TPS learning model gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, (4) in the PBL and GI learning model, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with high creativity were better than the students with medium and low creativity, the students with medium and low creativity gave same the learning achievement in mathematics. In the TPS learning model, the students with high and medium creativity gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high and medium creativity were better than the students the low creativity.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Group Investigation, Think Pair Share, Student Learning Creativity
House construction of time scheduling using criticalpath method (CPM) in selili district Surahman, Surahman; Saputri, Yuni; F. Athoya, Muhammad; H. Rabbani, Ihwan; Rahmayanti, Nor I.; Hidayati, Dwi
Enrichment : Journal of Management Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): June: Management Science And Field
Publisher : Institute of Computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/enrichment.v14i2.1897

Abstract

Project time management is the process of planning, compiling, and monitoring the project activity schedule. This is an approach to meeting needs in construction projects that involves managing the planning, design and project implementation processes in an integrated manner. The aim of this research is to determine the effect of accelerating work duration using the CPM (Critical Path Method) method on the Selili sub-district project. The acceleration alternative used is by cutting work time and combining several jobs that can be done at one time by looking for advanced calculations and backward and critical path calculations use the critical path which is then accelerated in the form of shortening the time of activities on the critical path. Then a float diagram is created to determine the work that has been cut. The results obtained from the work using the CPM method are a summary of work days of 15 days from the initial plan which was planned to be completed within 163 days, after going through the critical path using the critical path and knowing the results of the forward and backward calculations then depicted in a float diagram that the work can be completed within 148 days
Co-Authors Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno F. Athoya, Muhammad H. Rabbani, Ihwan Mardiyana Mardiyana Rahmayanti, Nor I. Saputri, Yuni Surahman Surahman