This Author published in this journals
All Journal Potensia
Muhammad Lukman
Pascasarjana Uin Suska Riau

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN VARIASI GAYA MENGAJAR TERHADAP MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM Muhammad Lukman; Risnawati Risnawati; Nurhasanah Bakhtiar
POTENSIA: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/potensia.v6i2.9778

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of scientific approach learning and variation in teaching style on students’learning motivationat junior high schools in Marpoyan Damai District, Pekanbaru. This research was correlational research including in quantitative approach. This research used random sampling as the sampling technique. Data were analyzed by using simple regression, multiple regression and coefficient of determination (r2) techniques. The results of data analysis showed that firstly, there was a significant influence of scientific approach learning on students’learning motivation at state junior high schools in Marpoyan Damai District, Pekanbaru with a level of influence of 0.279 and the significant value of 0,000 <0.05, secondly, there was a significant influence of variation inteaching style on students’learning motivation at state junior high schools in Marpoyan Damai District, Pekanbaru with a level of influence of 0.226 and the significant value of 0,000 <0.05, and lastly, there was a significant influence of scientific approach learning and variationin teaching style on students' learning motivation with a significant value of 0,000 <0.05 and the percentage of R2 (R square) of 0.090 or (9%). It shows that the percentage of contribution of independent variables (the learning of scientific approach and variation inteaching style) on the dependent variable (student motivation) was 9% meanwhile the remains (91%) were influenced by other variables.