Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Language Circle : Journal of Language and Literature Spirit Publik : Jurnal Administrasi Publik
- Indrawati
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
CONTEXT IN PRAGMATICS Indrawati, -
Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature Vol 3, No 2 (2009): April 2009
Publisher : Faculty of Languages ​​and Arts, State University of Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

People carry out almost all social behaviors through language, either spoken or written. The language to be used needs rules and principles; and when it comes to see language from a socio-cultural perspective, and consider the ‘worlds of users’ incorporating the context or ‘human condition’, people refer to the pragmatic use of it, which means that Pragmatics is the study of a context-dependent language. People owe their respects to great many linguists and experts in Pragmatics for their various expertises in this field to explain ‘how the language operates in force of contextually implied conditions’. With this view, the writer of this paper attempts to learn the important relationship between context and Pragmatics.
POLITENESS IN COMMUNITY PRACTICE Indrawati, -
Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature Vol 5, No 2 (2011): April 2011
Publisher : Faculty of Languages ​​and Arts, State University of Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:1; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face {font-family:"Arial Narrow"; panose-1:2 11 6 6 2 2 2 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 2048 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:EN-US; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; text-align:center;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> People in all types of societies organize themselves in relation to each other for work and other duties, and to structure their interactions. People’s behaviours and roles are guided by prevalent norms and regulations so influential that their particular characteristics might be seen by others as distinctively belong to certain groups of societies. Easterners and Westerners might be seen as having distinctive features regarding politeness in human relation. Eastern societies organize themselves primarily according to behaviours showing polite treatment for the sake of moral sanction and socio-cultural harmony. This probably explains easterners preference for a communal life. As with Western societies, they tend to esteem positive politeness related to intimacy and negative politeness related to individual freedom that is attached to their preference for individualism. Eastern societies and Western societies perform distinctive politeness strategies having their own reasons and tendencies as bounded by pragmatic backgrounds of their existence. Pragmatic aspects include language use of various societies, the direct and indirect utterances, explicature and implicature, politeness strategies and many more. International communication calls for world attention toward respecting these distinctive features of various cultural backgrounds. And the direct realization of this cultural pragmatic communication is looking at and doing communication pragmatically.   Key words: politeness strategies, positive politeness, negative politeness, cultural pragmatic communication POLITENESS IN COMMUNITY PRACTICE
THE REALITY OF LANGUAGE Indrawati, -
Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature Vol 4, No 2 (2010): April 2010
Publisher : Faculty of Languages ​​and Arts, State University of Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Language possesses a very significant role in the formation of reality inside the mind of its users. Three elements comprising of society, language, and thoughts are interrelated in constructing the reality of language in society. Society produces thoughts; thoughts create society, and language mediates the process of formulation of reciprocal relation between thoughts and society. Sexism in language use in society prevails in favours of men culture that is directly responsible for the way people see their world, as an important means of reinforcing sexist assumptions. As life flows to its natural course, this linguistic habit is challenged in its being rational and logical by linguistic feminists, of which both female and male. Keywords: sexism in language, linguistic feminists
CONTEXT IN PRAGMATICS Indrawati, -
Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature Vol 3, No 2 (2009): April 2009
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lc.v3i2.916

Abstract

People carry out almost all social behaviors through language, either spoken or written. The language to be used needs rules and principles; and when it comes to see language from a socio-cultural perspective, and consider the ‘worlds of users’ incorporating the context or ‘human condition’, people refer to the pragmatic use of it, which means that Pragmatics is the study of a context-dependent language. People owe their respects to great many linguists and experts in Pragmatics for their various expertises in this field to explain ‘how the language operates in force of contextually implied conditions’. With this view, the writer of this paper attempts to learn the important relationship between context and Pragmatics.
POLITENESS IN COMMUNITY PRACTICE Indrawati, -
Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature Vol 5, No 2 (2011): April 2011
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lc.v5i2.894

Abstract

<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:1; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face {font-family:"Arial Narrow"; panose-1:2 11 6 6 2 2 2 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 2048 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:EN-US; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; text-align:center;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> People in all types of societies organize themselves in relation to each other for work and other duties, and to structure their interactions. People’s behaviours and roles are guided by prevalent norms and regulations so influential that their particular characteristics might be seen by others as distinctively belong to certain groups of societies. Easterners and Westerners might be seen as having distinctive features regarding politeness in human relation. Eastern societies organize themselves primarily according to behaviours showing polite treatment for the sake of moral sanction and socio-cultural harmony. This probably explains easterners preference for a communal life. As with Western societies, they tend to esteem positive politeness related to intimacy and negative politeness related to individual freedom that is attached to their preference for individualism. Eastern societies and Western societies perform distinctive politeness strategies having their own reasons and tendencies as bounded by pragmatic backgrounds of their existence. Pragmatic aspects include language use of various societies, the direct and indirect utterances, explicature and implicature, politeness strategies and many more. International communication calls for world attention toward respecting these distinctive features of various cultural backgrounds. And the direct realization of this cultural pragmatic communication is looking at and doing communication pragmatically.   Key words: politeness strategies, positive politeness, negative politeness, cultural pragmatic communication POLITENESS IN COMMUNITY PRACTICE
THE REALITY OF LANGUAGE Indrawati, -
Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature Vol 4, No 2 (2010): April 2010
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lc.v4i2.899

Abstract

Language possesses a very significant role in the formation of reality inside the mind of its users. Three elements comprising of society, language, and thoughts are interrelated in constructing the reality of language in society. Society produces thoughts; thoughts create society, and language mediates the process of formulation of reciprocal relation between thoughts and society. Sexism in language use in society prevails in favours of men culture that is directly responsible for the way people see their world, as an important means of reinforcing sexist assumptions. As life flows to its natural course, this linguistic habit is challenged in its being rational and logical by linguistic feminists, of which both female and male. Keywords: sexism in language, linguistic feminists
Menggagas Ruang Publik Berbasis Demokrasi Deliberatif: Studi Dinamika Pengelolaan Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak (RPTRA) di Jakarta Utara Dodi Faedlulloh; Retnayu Prasetyanti; - Indrawati
Spirit Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol 12, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (366.761 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/sp.v12i2.16240

Abstract

Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta sedang melakukan upaya membangun kanal-kanal ruang publik untuk merubah wajah kota dengan cara membangun Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak (RPTRA) sebagai upaya mendukung Jakarta menjadi Kota Layak Anak. Berbeda dengan gagasan Jürgen Habermas yang menjelaskan konsep ruang publik sebagai ruang yang mandiri dan terpisah dari negara dan pasar, RPTRA justru merupakan hasil dari kemitraan antara pemerintah dengan perusahaan melalui CSR. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisa RPTRA dalam perspektif ruang publik yang berbasis demokrasi deliberatif. Adapun lokasi penelitian ini yaitu RPTRA Sungai Bambu dan RPTRA Sunter Jaya Berseri yang keduanya berada di Kota Administrasi Jakarta Utara. Proyek pembangunan RPTRA merupakan momentum untuk mengoptimalkan dan memperluas ruang-ruang publik yang mampu diakses dan dikontrol lansung oleh publik di DKI Jakarta pada umumnya, dan Jakarta Utara khususnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu penelitian kualitatif dengan menggali informasi dan data melalui observasi langsung, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa RPTRA telah memenuhi karakter ruang publik sebagai ruang interaksi masyarakat, dikelola dan dikontrol bersama untuk kepentingan publik, terbuka bagi semua tanpa kecuali, dan secara relatif menjadi ruang kebebasan dan aktualisasi bagi warga. Namun bila ditinjau dalam perspektif demokrasi deliberatif, kekurangan terjadi saat proses pembangunan RPTRA karena warga tidak dilibatkan secara aktif. Aktor yang dominan dalam proses pembangunan adalah pihak swasta dan pemerintah. Adapun transformasi demokrasi deliberatif tercipta saat pada proses pengelolaan RPTRA.Kata Kunci: Ruang Publik, RPTRA, CSRKata Kunci: Ruang Publik, Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak, CSR
Co-Authors Dodi Faedlulloh, Dodi Retnayu Prasetyanti