Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Syariah Courts in Malaysia and the Development of Islamic Jurisprudence: The Study of Istihsan Mohd Hafiz Jamaludin; Ahmad Hidayat Buang
International Journal of Nusantara Islam Vol 1, No 1 (2013): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijni.v1i1.33

Abstract

Malaysia is among the countries, which have very close relations with Shafi'i madhhab in term of Islamic Law. This can be seen from the provisions of Syariah Law in Malaysia where the opinion of the Shafi'i madhhab is preferred than other madhhabs. However, the current situations and issues cause that the other opinions from the other madhhabs are also used and practiced in order to provide the best solutions. This is also true in respect on the use of sources of Islamic law, such as Istihsan, Istislah and Qawl Sahabi, which are rejected by the Shafi'i madhhab. Therefore, this study attempts to analyze the development of Islamic law, particularly in the application of the concept of Istihsan in the Syariah Courts in Malaysia. This study has examined a number of cases reported in the Jurnal Hukum issued by the Syariah Judiciary Department of Malaysia (JKSM). The result of this study found that in several cases, the judges have applied indirectly the concept of Istihsan in their judgment. It is also found that it is actually the provisions of the law that allows the Shariah judges to indirectly apply this concept.
Talfīq as A Method for Legal Solutions in Contemporary Islamic Law Jamaludin, Mohd Hafiz; Buang, Ahmad Hidayat; Purkon, Arip
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 24, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v24i1.33608

Abstract

Talfīq, or the combination of various opinions of jurisprudence madhhab, is frequently used to arrive at solutions in Islamic law. It was used extensively in the tajdīd era, the early 20th century AD, namely through the Islamic law reforms in family and personal matters in most Muslim countries. The concept is controversial and not universally accepted by ulama. Most classical ulama opposed it, although most contemporary ulama believe that talfīq is acceptable as a method for legal solutions. This research investigated the reasons or factors for this disagreement by analyzing the related views of such ulama. The qualitative research used a literature review from classical and contemporary books about talfīq. This research concluded that although the classical ulama appeared to be grounded firmly in their opposition to the practice of talfīq, subsequent development of Islamic law showed practical consideration made inroads in accepting talfīq as a method for legal solution. This acceptance is made by putting conditions and controls on how and when talfīq can be used to solve modern Muslim legal problems. This modification ensures the traditionalists that the danger of talfīq, as previously envisaged, would be avoided Abstrak: Talfīq atau gabungan berbagai pendapat mazhab fikih merupakan metode yang sering digunakan untuk mencari solusi dalam hukum Islam. Hal ini digunakan secara luas pada zaman tajdīd, yaitu awal abad XX Masehi, melalui reformasi hukum Islam dalam masalah hukum privat dan keluarga di sebagian besar negara Muslim. Konsepnya kontroversial dan tidak disetujui secara universal oleh para sarjana. Mayoritas ulama Islam klasik telah menentangnya meskipun sebagian besar ulama kontemporer berpandangan bahwa talfīq dapat diterima sebagai metode penyelesaian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki alasan atau faktor ketidaksepakatan ini dengan melihat sampel dari pandangan terkait dari para ulama tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan tinjauan pustaka. Data diperoleh dari buku-buku klasik dan kontemporer yang menulis tentang talfīq. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa meskipun para ulama klasik pada mulanya tampak berpijak kuat pada penentangan mereka terhadap praktik talfīq, perkembangan hukum Islam selanjutnya menunjukkan pertimbangan praktis yang membuat terobosan dalam menerima talfīq sebagai metode penyelesaian hukum. Penerimaan ini dilakukan dengan meletakkan kondisi dan kontrol tentang bagaimana dan kapan talfīq dapat digunakan dalam memberikan solusi atas masalah hukum Islam modern. Modifikasi ini memastikan kaum tradisionalis menghindari bahaya talfīq seperti yang dibayangkan sebelumnya. 
Talfīq as A Method for Legal Solutions in Contemporary Islamic Law Jamaludin, Mohd Hafiz; Buang, Ahmad Hidayat; Purkon, Arip
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v24i1.33608

Abstract

Talfīq, or the combination of various opinions of jurisprudence madhhab, is frequently used to arrive at solutions in Islamic law. It was used extensively in the tajdīd era, the early 20th century AD, namely through the Islamic law reforms in family and personal matters in most Muslim countries. The concept is controversial and not universally accepted by ulama. Most classical ulama opposed it, although most contemporary ulama believe that talfīq is acceptable as a method for legal solutions. This research investigated the reasons or factors for this disagreement by analyzing the related views of such ulama. The qualitative research used a literature review from classical and contemporary books about talfīq. This research concluded that although the classical ulama appeared to be grounded firmly in their opposition to the practice of talfīq, subsequent development of Islamic law showed practical consideration made inroads in accepting talfīq as a method for legal solution. This acceptance is made by putting conditions and controls on how and when talfīq can be used to solve modern Muslim legal problems. This modification ensures the traditionalists that the danger of talfīq, as previously envisaged, would be avoided Abstrak: Talfīq atau gabungan berbagai pendapat mazhab fikih merupakan metode yang sering digunakan untuk mencari solusi dalam hukum Islam. Hal ini digunakan secara luas pada zaman tajdīd, yaitu awal abad XX Masehi, melalui reformasi hukum Islam dalam masalah hukum privat dan keluarga di sebagian besar negara Muslim. Konsepnya kontroversial dan tidak disetujui secara universal oleh para sarjana. Mayoritas ulama Islam klasik telah menentangnya meskipun sebagian besar ulama kontemporer berpandangan bahwa talfīq dapat diterima sebagai metode penyelesaian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki alasan atau faktor ketidaksepakatan ini dengan melihat sampel dari pandangan terkait dari para ulama tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan tinjauan pustaka. Data diperoleh dari buku-buku klasik dan kontemporer yang menulis tentang talfīq. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa meskipun para ulama klasik pada mulanya tampak berpijak kuat pada penentangan mereka terhadap praktik talfīq, perkembangan hukum Islam selanjutnya menunjukkan pertimbangan praktis yang membuat terobosan dalam menerima talfīq sebagai metode penyelesaian hukum. Penerimaan ini dilakukan dengan meletakkan kondisi dan kontrol tentang bagaimana dan kapan talfīq dapat digunakan dalam memberikan solusi atas masalah hukum Islam modern. Modifikasi ini memastikan kaum tradisionalis menghindari bahaya talfīq seperti yang dibayangkan sebelumnya.