Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Kebijakan Formulasi Pemidanaan Terhadap Penyebar Selebaran Mengandung Unsur Provokatif Dalam RKUHP I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana
Kertha Patrika Vol 44 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2022.v44.i01.p.06

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pemidanaan terhadap perbuatan penyebar selebaran yang mengandung unsur provokatif dalam Hukum Positif dan sanksi terhadap perbuatan penyebar selebaran yang mengandung unsur provokatif dalam perspektif ius constituendum agar memiliki kepastian hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini mempergunakan jenis penelitian hukum yuridis normatif, karena adanya kekaburan norma. Analisis isu hukum dalam penelitian ini, menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan perbandingan. Memprovokasi adalah perbuatan berupa pernyatakan perasaan permusuhan, kebencian atau penghinaan di depan umum terhadap suatu atau beberapa golongan, dapat dikatakan sebagai ujaran kebencian jika perasaan permusuhan, kebencian atau penghinaan tersebut dilakukan dalam bentuk tindakan dan usaha baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung. Pengaturan hukum terhadap perbuatan menyebar selebaran yang mengandung unsur provokatif yang paling mendekati terdapat dalam RKUHP tahun 2019, Pasal 241, 243 ayat (1), Pasal 246 dan Pasal 247. Apabila dalam unsur provokatif tersebut mengandung makna menghasut untuk melakukan tindak pidana, maka diatur dalam Pasal 246 dan 247. Terdapat perbedaan sanksi pidana yang diatur dalam KUHP dan RKUHP 2019. Sanksi pidana mengenai unsur yang mengandung provokatif untuk melakukan perbuatan pidana diatur dalam Pasal 161 KUHP diancam dengan pidana penjara paling lama empat tahun atau pidana denda paling banyak empat ribu lima ratus rupiah. Sedangkan dalam RKUHP 2019 Pasal 247, sanksi pidana terhadap setiap orang yang melakukan perbuatan menyebar selebaran yang mengandung unsur provokatif untuk melakukan tindak pidana diancam dengan pidana penjara paling lama 4 (empat) tahun 6 (enam) bulan atau pidana denda paling banyak kategori V
Non Litigation Dispute Resolution in Settlement of Civil Disputes I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana; Ni Made Liana Dewi
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (770.074 KB)

Abstract

Dispute resolution through the courts is considered the main way of solving problems. The judiciary, which is basically formed to adjudicate and resolve problems, but in reality sometimes it is unable to solve the problems faced by the parties, sometimes it even creates new problems. This research discusses how Non-Litigation settlement legal efforts in Civil dispute resolution and Non-Litigation dispute resolution obstacles according to Civil Law. The research method used is an empirical research method by examining and getting answers to problems regarding the settlement and obstacles to non-litigation dispute resolution according to civil law. The result of this research is the settlement of civil disputes, namely by means of non-litigation, which has several forms, namely Negotiation, Mediation and Arbitration. Meanwhile, the obstacle to non-litigation settlement in civil law cases of sale and purchase is about mediation and the validity of the results of the parties' reconciliation.
UPAYA PENANGANAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN CPNS DI WILAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN DAERAH BALI I Gede Yoga Mahardiana; I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana
Kerta Dyatmika Vol 20 No 1 (2023): Kerta Dyatmika
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dwijendra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46650/kd.20.1.1367.51-63

Abstract

Penipuan terhadap calon pegawai negeri sipil (CPNS) semakin sering terjadi baik di daerah terpencil maupun di daerah perkotaan. Meningat bahwa tindak kejahatan penipuan bisa terjadi dimana saja, kapan saja, dan oleh siapa saja terutama Penipuan terhadap calon pegawai negeri sipil (CPNS), yang dimana masyarakat beranggapan bahwa dengan menjadi PNS berarti bahwa kesejahteraan hidupnya akan terjamin sehingga gampang tergirus dengan bujuk rayu dari penipu, maka dari itu dirasa perlu dilakukan upaya penanganan tertentu oleh kepolisian. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, maka rumusan masalah yang diperoleh adalah bagaimana upaya penanganan terhadap tindak pidana penipuan CPNS oleh kepolisian daerah Bali, dan apa saja kendala yang dialami kepolisian Daerah Bali dalam penanganan tindak pidana penipuan CPNS. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum empiris yaitu penelitian yang berfokus pada perilaku masyarakat hukum. Dilihat dari segi sifatnya, penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif pada umumnya, Penelitian hukum empiris ini, menggunakan data primer sebagai sumber data utama disamping data sekunder dan data tersier sebagai pendukung. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode observasi, wawancara, dan metode dokumentasi. Setelah bahan terkumpul, selanjutnya dilakukan analisis secara kualitatif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah upaya penanganan terhadap tindak pidana penipuan CPNS oleh kepolisian daerah Bali berupa penyampaian informasi dan himbauan terkait adanya calo-calo yang berbahaya. Kemudian kendala yang dialami kepolisian Daerah Bali adalah kurang sadarnya masyarakat akan penggunaan calo, kurangnya bukti dari para pelapor, proses penyidikan yang tidak sederhana dan pola piker masyarakat terhadap keberadaan calo. Fraud against prospective civil servants (CPNS) is increasingly common in both remote and urban areas. Considering that fraudulent acts can occur anywhere, anytime, and by anyone, particularly fraud against prospective civil servants (CPNS), in which people perceive that being a civil servant means that their welfare will be guaranteed so that they are easily affected by the persuasion of fraudsters. Therefore, police’s efforts is necessarily required to handle such condition. This research aims at investigating the efforts committed by Bali regional police to deal with criminal acts of CPNS fraud as well as the obstacles experienced in handling such criminal acts. This research is an empirical legal research that focuses on the behavior of the legal community. In terms of its nature, this research is a descriptive research in general. It used primary data as the main data source supported with secondary and tertiary data. The data were collected through observation, interview, and documentation methods. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively. This research concluded that the efforts of Bali regional police to handle criminal acts of CPNS fraud are in the form of delivering information and warnings related to the existence of dangerous brokers. Then the obstacles experienced by the Bali Regional Police are the public's lack of awareness on using brokers, lack of evidence from the complainants, complicated investigation process, and the community's mindset about the existence of brokers.
KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI PENGATURAN PEMBUATAN PASPOR DITINJAU DARI PASAL 126 HURUF C UNDANG UNDANG KEIMIGRASIAN I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana; Ni Made Liana Dewi
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 17 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Fakultas Dharma Duta Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25078/vyavaharaduta.v17i2.1971

Abstract

Immigration has a role as a gatekeeper of the state,as a regulator and supervisor of entry and exit of people in the territory of Indonesia. Therefore, everyone is required to have a passport. In the process of making a passport, if the information provided is incorrect, the passport applicant will be subject to criminal sanctions. Based on the article, the formulation of the problem is: how is the passport process 126 Letter c of Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration to provide legal certainty? and how is the formulation policy for regulating the process of making the passport of the Republic of Indonesia in providing information that is not really from the perspective of the Ius Constituendum? The research method used is a normative research type, using a statute approach, and a comparative approach. Using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is by literature study, the technique of analyzing legal materials is by using descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that the passport making process is carried out through the Online Passport Service application. If there is an indication that the information submitted is not true (false or false information) then the judge can make a grammatical interpretation so that there is legal certainty. The formulation policy for regulating the process of making passports for the Republic of Indonesia in relation to providing incorrect information from the perspective of the Ius Constituendum, is the formulation of criminalization patterns in "incorrect information" for the passport making process during the interview session. There are weaknesses in the formulation of the article where there is no more detailed explanation. A formulated policy is formulated with the aim that it can be applied because it relates to the scope of the enactment of the criminal law.
Authority Of The Internal Investigating Prosecutor Make Arrest And Detention Performers Of Criminal Acts Of Corruption I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana; Ni Made Liana Dewi; Ni Putu Ari Seni Antari
Journal of Sustainable Development Science Vol 5 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Dwijendra Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46650/jsds.5.2.1487.39-46

Abstract

Described problems in this research is what does the legal basis of the inventory in arrest and detention the corruptor. The objectives of this research is to know the legal basis of investigators in creating and handling the corruptor, and to know the obstacles contained incidence principles in catching and handling the corruptors. The research method used in this study is the normative juridical which is a study that refers to legal analysis. The approach in this study emphasizes the legislation approach that is the search for some legislation related to the investigation of corruption crime. The result of the research is indicate the normative juridical basis of the authority of the prosecutor in conducting arrest and detention in accordance to with article 16th KUHAP and article 20th KUHAP. Regarding the obstacles on the implementation of arrest and detention perfomance is related to the time of arrest the geographical position if indonesian associated shall create problems that does not allow the arrest within one day, other factors are the suspects escape and the dificulty to done so that inhibit persuit investigation process. Obstacles to detention may also be encountered by a suspect who refuses detention and insists not to be detained, the suspect flees and does not meet the conditoins of detention in article 21th KUHAP.