Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.723
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Lex Renaissance Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Melayunesia Law
Siti Malikhatun Badriyah
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Juridical Analysis of Prohibition of Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition in Wholesaler Procedures for Sales of Umrah Tickets by PT. Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk Redati Tsaniya Sekarsari; Siti Malikhatun Badriyah
Melayunesia Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Melayunesia Law
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/ed80em43

Abstract

The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) decided that PT. Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. committing violations related to discrimination and making efforts to close access to distribution channels for direct sales of Umrah tickets to and from Jeddah and Medina through the Wholesaler Program. Where is PT. Garuda issued a policy regarding Middle East Asia (MEA) ticket sales that required Umrah Pilgrimage Organizers (PPIU) to purchase through the six designated wholesalers. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal consequences of the practice of prohibiting monopoly in the wholesaler procedure for selling Umrah tickets by PT. Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach (Statutes Approach), namely Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and a case approach (Case Approach), namely Decision Number 06/KPPU-L/ 2020 regarding Alleged Discriminatory Practices of PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero).
Analisis Validitas dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Otentik dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia Salsabila Ghina Luthfiyah; Siti Malikhatun Badriyah
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.1968

Abstract

The role of notaries in ensuring the validity of authentic deeds in land sale transactions is crucial in Indonesia’s civil law system. Notaries are tasked with ensuring that these transactions are legally valid, comply with all requirements stipulated by the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), and possess strong evidentiary power in court. A key aspect of this role is to ensure that the parties have the legal capacity to engage in the transaction and that the land being sold has a clear legal status, such as a certificate registered with the National Land Agency (BPN). The validity of the notarial deed is also influenced by factors such as incomplete documentation, unclear legal status of the parties involved, and non-compliance with applicable regulations. To address these issues, notaries must ensure proper document verification and provide adequate explanation to the parties about their rights and obligations. Legal solutions to these problems include verifying the legal status of the land, fulfilling tax obligations, and preventing fraudulent actions in the transaction. Therefore, notaries act not only as witnesses but also as protectors of legal certainty in land sale transactions.
Implikasi Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Asas Parate Eksekusi dalam Jaminan Fidusia Maddhawati, Meitta; Siti Malikhatun Badriyah
Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.10220

Abstract

This study analyzes the implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on the application of the parate execution principle in fiduciary security. The research is motivated by the transformation of fiduciary execution, where parate execution can no longer be exercised unilaterally by creditors without debtor consent regarding default or a court decision. This study employs a normative juridical research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to examine changes in the legal meaning and implementation of parate execution after the Constitutional Court’s decision. The findings indicate that the decision does not abolish parate execution but conditions its application on specific procedural requirements, including debtor acknowledgment of default and judicial oversight in the event of disputes. Accordingly, the scope of creditors’ direct execution rights becomes limited, while legal protection for debtors is strengthened through the application of the due process of law principle. The study concludes that the Constitutional Court Decision represents a recalibration of the parate execution principle within fiduciary law rather than its complete elimination.
Co-Authors Alifia Fisilmi Kaffah Augusto Edytama Prasetia Ayu Cahya Widianingrum Maddhawati, Meitta Nabila Tasya Ramadintya Novita Chairunisa Raihan Dewangga Mughni Redati Tsaniya Sekarsari Riastya Safira Salsabila Ghina Luthfiyah Septa Junisa