Silas Henry Ismanto
Psikiater, Departemen Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, Dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada/RSUP Dr Sardjito, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI 2) examination in patients with benzodiazepine addiction in Yogyakarta Silas Henry Ismanto; Irwan Supriyanto
Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran) Vol 47, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (291.288 KB) | DOI: 10.19106/JMedSci004703201502

Abstract

Addiction is a major health problem in Indonesia. The prevalence and pattern of drugsaddiction shifted according to changes in personality, stressors, or increasing responsibilityas people grow. Individual personality will affect their tendency to develop drug addiction.Benzodiazepines abuse has steadily increased. Unlike other type drugs of abuse, thecharacteristics of benzodiazepine abusers are greatly varied. Therefore, the personalitytraits and social economic factors involved in the benzodiazepine addiction are unique.In this study we evaluated the personality traits of patient with benzodiazepine addictionin Yogyakarta using Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) 2 test. Thisstudy was a descriptive analytic study with a cross sectional design. Subjects were 39benzodiazepine addicts obtained from private psychiatrist practices in Yogyakarta. Theinstruments used were questionnaire for personal information and MMPI 2. Statisticalanalysis was conducted with SPSS ver. 17 and significance level was defined at p<0.05.MMPI 2 test revealed a low total mental capacity index and a low basic personality index(OCEAN: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism).The clinical profiles examination showed profile of somatic symptoms due to psychologicaldisturbances, clinical symptoms of overt suspiciousness, overt negative emotionality,clinical symptoms of depression, symptoms of psychopathic behaviours (antisocial),emotional difficulty in interpersonal relationship, clinical symptoms related to overtemotion, and weird and bizarre psychological experiences. There are certain personalityvariables that may be important predictors for benzodiazepine addiction identified in thisstudy.
The Correlation between Alcohol Consumption with Anxiety Level on Multiple Drugs User in Sleman Andrian Fajar Kusumadewi; Carissa Aulia Firliany; Silas Henry Ismanto; Afkar Aulia
Archives of The Medicine and Case Reports Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Archives of The Medicine and Case Reports
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/amcr.v1i2.8

Abstract

Since 2013, data showed alcohol consumption in Indonesia increased from 3% to 3.3%, and 0.8% of the population consumes alcohol over the limit (Riskesdas 2018). Consuming alcohol over the limit not only impacts someone physically but also mentally. One of the mental impacts of alcohol consumption is anxiety. If the anxiety is not treated properly, it can lead a patient to consume more alcohol and, moreover, develop an alcohol addiction. To examine alcohol consumption levels and their correlation to anxiety levels. This study is analytical research with a quantitative cross-sectional survey design. Sampling techniques were done by consecutive sampling with the AUDIT questionnaire survey to measure alcohol consumption level and the T-MAS questionnaire survey to measure anxiety level of respondents. The research sample consists of 30 multiple drug user respondents. We got a 0.569 p-value score with Pearson Chi-Square analysis, which can be interpreted to mean that there is no correlation between alcohol consumption and anxiety level. Patients with alcohol abuse mostly come from low-to-average academic groups, a total of 29 people, and not married groups, a total of 18. There is no correlation between alcohol consumption and anxiety levels. The respondent's anxiety level is influenced by his or her academic grade and marital status.
Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Indonesia Wikan Ardiningrum; Carla Raymondalexas Marchira; Cecep Sugeng Kristanto; Silas Henry Ismanto; Seviana Primawati
Cermin Dunia Kedokteran Vol 46, No 5 (2019): Pediatri
Publisher : PT. Kalbe Farma Tbk.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55175/cdk.v46i5.475

Abstract

Introduksi. Defisit kognitif merupakan prediktor konsisten disabilitas pasien skizofrenia. Salah satu instrumen penilaian fungsi kognitif pasien skizofrenia adalah Cognitive Assessment Interview.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Bahasa Indonesia (CAI-Ina). Metode. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas meliputi uji validitas isi, uji validitas konstruk, uji reliabilitas inter rater, dan uji reliabilitas konsistensi internal. Pengambilan data dilakukan satu kali pada 112 pasien skizofrenia dan informan di klinik rawat jalan psikiatri RS Jiwa Grhasia DIY. Analisis data menggunakan SPSS 16. Hasil. Hasil kajian ulang, penerjemahan dan terjemahan balik CAI-Ina oleh pakar telah disetujui oleh Ventura sebagai penyusun instrumen asli. Semua item dalam instrumen CAI-Ina memiliki mempunyai korelasi sedang-kuat dengan skor total CAI-Ina (r=0,568-0,720, p<0,001). Terdapat korelasi sangat kuat antara skor total penilai, pasien, dan informan (r=0,903-0,944, p<0,001). Analisis faktor mendapatkan dua komponen utama yaitu komponen terkait memori dan tidak terkait memori yang keduanya dapat menjelaskan 58,6% keseluruhan konstruk instrumen CAI-Ina. Nilai Cronbach’s alpha pasien 0,789; informan 0,835; dan penilai 0,850. Hasil uji interrater koefisien Kappa seluruh item dan skor total 0,722-0,939 dan koefisen konkordansi Kendall W 0,834-0,985. Skor CAI-Ina memiliki korelasi kuat dengan skor GAF (r=-0,722-(-)0,808; p<0,001) maupun kemampuan fungsi sosial (r=-0,684-(-)0,750; p<0,001). Simpulan. CAI-Ina memiliki validitas isi dan konstruk yang baik serta reliabilitas yang tinggi.Introduction. Cognitive deficit is a consistent predictor for disabilities in patient with schizophrenia. One instrument that can be used to assess cognitive deficit in schizophrenia is Cognitive Assessment Interview. This study will evaluate the validity and reliability of CAI instrument in Indonesia languange version (CAI-Ina). Method. The validity and reliability evaluation includes content validity, construct validity, inter rater reliabity, and internal consistency reliabity. Data was collected from 112 patients and informants in the outpatient clinic in Grhasia Mental Hospital DIY. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16. Result. Reassessment result, translation and back translation by an expert have been approved by Ventura as the original author. All items in the CAI have medium-strong correlation with the total score of CAI-Ina (r=0.568-0.720; p<0.001). There was a very strong correlation among the total score of the raters, patients, and informants (r=0.903-0.944; p<0.001). The two major components : memory related components and non-memory related components can explain 58.6% total instrument construct in the CAI-Ina. Cronbach’s alpha of patients was 0.789; of informants was 0.835; and of rater was 0.850. Kappa coefficients of all items and the total scores were 0.722- 0.939. The Kendall W concordance coefficients were 0.834 – 0.985. Score of CAI-Ina have a strong correlation with GAF score (r=-0.722-(-)0.808; p<0.001) and social functioning (r=-0.684-(-)0.750; p<0.001). Conclusion. CAI-Ina has a good content and construct validity, also has a high reliability.
Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Indonesia Wikan Ardiningrum; Carla Raymondalexas Marchira; Cecep Sugeng Kristanto; Silas Henry Ismanto; Seviana Primawati
Cermin Dunia Kedokteran Vol. 46 No. 5 (2019): Pediatri
Publisher : PT Kalbe Farma Tbk.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55175/cdk.v46i5.458

Abstract

Introduksi. Defisit kognitif merupakan prediktor konsisten disabilitas pasien skizofrenia. Salah satu instrumen penilaian fungsi kognitif pasien skizofrenia adalah Cognitive Assessment Interview. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Bahasa Indonesia (CAI-Ina). Metode. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas meliputi uji validitas isi, uji validitas konstruk, uji reliabilitas interrater, dan uji reliabilitas konsistensi internal. Pengambilan data dilakukan satu kali pada 112 pasien skizofrenia dan informan di klinik rawat jalan psikiatri RS Jiwa Grhasia DIY. Analisis data menggunakan SPSS 16. Hasil. Hasil kajian ulang, penerjemahan, dan terjemahan balik CAI-Ina oleh pakar telah disetujui oleh Ventura sebagai penyusun instrumen asli. Semua item dalam instrumen CAI-Ina memiliki korelasi sedang-kuat dengan skor total CAI-Ina (r=0,568-0,720; p<0,001). Terdapat korelasi sangat kuat antara skor total penilai, pasien, dan informan (r=0,903-0,944; p<0,001). Analisis faktor mendapatkan dua komponen utama, yaitu komponen terkait memori dan tidak terkait memori yang keduanya dapat menjelaskan 58,6% keseluruhan konstruk instrumen CAI-Ina. Nilai Cronbach’s alpha pasien 0,789; informan 0,835; dan penilai 0,850. Hasil uji interrater koefisien Kappa seluruh item dan skor total 0,722-0,939 dan koefisien konkordansi Kendall W 0,834-0,985. Skor CAI-Ina memiliki korelasi kuat dengan skor GAF (r=-0,722-(-)0,808; p<0,001) ataupun kemampuan fungsi sosial (r=-0,684-(-)0,750; p<0,001). CAI-Ina memiliki validitas isi dan konstruk yang baik serta reliabilitas yang tinggi. Introduction. Cognitive deficit is a consistent predictor for disabilities in patient with schizophrenia. One instrument that can be used to assess cognitive deficit in schizophrenia is Cognitive Assessment Interview. This study will evaluate the validity and reliability of CAI instrument in Indonesia languange version (CAI-Ina). Method. The validity and reliability evaluation includes content validity, construct validity, inter rater reliability, and internal consistency reliability. Data was collected one time from 112 patients and informants in the outpatient clinic in Grhasia Mental Hospital DIY. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16. Result. Reassessment result, translation and back translation by an expert have been approved by Ventura as the original author. All items in the CAI have medium-strong correlation with the total score of CAI-Ina (r=0.568-0.720; p<0.001). There was a very strong correlation among the total score of the raters, patients, and informants (r=0.903-0.944; p<0.001). The two major components : memory related components and non-memory related components can explain 58.6% total instrument construct in the CAI-Ina. Cronbach’s alpha of patients was 0.789; of informants was 0.835; and of rater was 0.850. Kappa coefficients of all items and the total scores were 0.722- 0.939. The Kendall W concordance coefficients were 0.834 – 0.985. Score of CAI-Ina have a strong correlation with GAF score (r=-0.722-(-)0.808; p<0.001) and social functioning (r=-0.684-(-)0.750; p<0.001). CAI-Ina has a good content and constructs validity, also has a high reliability.
Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Indonesia Wikan Ardiningrum; Carla Raymondalexas Marchira; Cecep Sugeng Kristanto; Silas Henry Ismanto; Seviana Primawati
Cermin Dunia Kedokteran Vol 46 No 5 (2019): Pediatri
Publisher : PT Kalbe Farma Tbk.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55175/cdk.v46i5.458

Abstract

Introduksi. Defisit kognitif merupakan prediktor konsisten disabilitas pasien skizofrenia. Salah satu instrumen penilaian fungsi kognitif pasien skizofrenia adalah Cognitive Assessment Interview. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Bahasa Indonesia (CAI-Ina). Metode. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas meliputi uji validitas isi, uji validitas konstruk, uji reliabilitas interrater, dan uji reliabilitas konsistensi internal. Pengambilan data dilakukan satu kali pada 112 pasien skizofrenia dan informan di klinik rawat jalan psikiatri RS Jiwa Grhasia DIY. Analisis data menggunakan SPSS 16. Hasil. Hasil kajian ulang, penerjemahan, dan terjemahan balik CAI-Ina oleh pakar telah disetujui oleh Ventura sebagai penyusun instrumen asli. Semua item dalam instrumen CAI-Ina memiliki korelasi sedang-kuat dengan skor total CAI-Ina (r=0,568-0,720; p<0,001). Terdapat korelasi sangat kuat antara skor total penilai, pasien, dan informan (r=0,903-0,944; p<0,001). Analisis faktor mendapatkan dua komponen utama, yaitu komponen terkait memori dan tidak terkait memori yang keduanya dapat menjelaskan 58,6% keseluruhan konstruk instrumen CAI-Ina. Nilai Cronbach’s alpha pasien 0,789; informan 0,835; dan penilai 0,850. Hasil uji interrater koefisien Kappa seluruh item dan skor total 0,722-0,939 dan koefisien konkordansi Kendall W 0,834-0,985. Skor CAI-Ina memiliki korelasi kuat dengan skor GAF (r=-0,722-(-)0,808; p<0,001) ataupun kemampuan fungsi sosial (r=-0,684-(-)0,750; p<0,001). CAI-Ina memiliki validitas isi dan konstruk yang baik serta reliabilitas yang tinggi. Introduction. Cognitive deficit is a consistent predictor for disabilities in patient with schizophrenia. One instrument that can be used to assess cognitive deficit in schizophrenia is Cognitive Assessment Interview. This study will evaluate the validity and reliability of CAI instrument in Indonesia languange version (CAI-Ina). Method. The validity and reliability evaluation includes content validity, construct validity, inter rater reliability, and internal consistency reliability. Data was collected one time from 112 patients and informants in the outpatient clinic in Grhasia Mental Hospital DIY. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16. Result. Reassessment result, translation and back translation by an expert have been approved by Ventura as the original author. All items in the CAI have medium-strong correlation with the total score of CAI-Ina (r=0.568-0.720; p<0.001). There was a very strong correlation among the total score of the raters, patients, and informants (r=0.903-0.944; p<0.001). The two major components : memory related components and non-memory related components can explain 58.6% total instrument construct in the CAI-Ina. Cronbach’s alpha of patients was 0.789; of informants was 0.835; and of rater was 0.850. Kappa coefficients of all items and the total scores were 0.722- 0.939. The Kendall W concordance coefficients were 0.834 – 0.985. Score of CAI-Ina have a strong correlation with GAF score (r=-0.722-(-)0.808; p<0.001) and social functioning (r=-0.684-(-)0.750; p<0.001). CAI-Ina has a good content and constructs validity, also has a high reliability.