Udiyo Basuki
Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PROBLEMATIKA PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 100/PUU-XI/2013 DALAM MENDUDUKKAN PANCASILA SEBAGAI DASAR NEGARA Udiyo Basuki; Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Wacana Hukum Vol 24 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/1.jwh.2018.24.2.2713

Abstract

In the legislative system, Pancasila is a basic norm (staatsfundamental), which successively then verfassungnorm UUD 1945, grundgezetznorm or MPR provisions, and gezetznorm or the Act. But in reality, Pancasila is equalized and equated with the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, which is then referred to as the Four Pillars of Nation and State. The Constitutional Court as the constitution gatekeeper institution returns the position of the Pancasila as the state foundation through the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 100/PUU-XI/2012. The decision is part of the implementation of the authority of the Constitutional Court which has 4 (four) authorities and 1 (one) obligation as stipulated in Article 24C paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. In addition to being a guardian of democracy ) The Constitutional Court is also the Protector of the state's foundation and legal source.
Problematika Pendaftaran Partai Politik Peserta Pemilu di Era Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum Faizi Zain; Udiyo Basuki
Wacana Hukum Vol 25 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/1.jwh.2019.25.2.3035

Abstract

The birth of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections strengthens the position of the Election Supervisory Body in enforcing election law. In addition to election crimes, other powers he has are taking action and deciding administrative violations, even though the authority is the authority of the State Administrative Court. This study is a combination of library research (library research) and field research (field research) that are descriptive analytical. The approach used is a normative approach. This study attempts to answer two questions; how to settle the election dispute process, and how the electoral dispute law enforcement system in Indonesia. The results showed that the authority to decide on dispute resolution in the electoral process was in Bawaslu whose decision was final and binding, but in practice legal remedies were made to the Administrative Court of Negarab and ended at the Supreme Court through appeals, appeals and judicial review.
Dinamika Bank Syari’ah dalam Percaturan Perekonomian dan Hukum di Indonesia azzarqa azzarqa; Udiyo Basuki
Az-Zarqa': Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam Vol 9, No 2 (2017): Az-Zarqa'
Publisher : Sharia and Law Faculty of Sunan Kalijaga Islamic State University Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/azzarqa.v9i2.1467

Abstract

Perbankan merupakan lembaga keuangan yang sangat penting dalam menjalankan kegiatan perekonomian. Bagi perekonomian modern, perbankan memudahkan pertukaran dan membantu pembentukan modal dan produksi berskala massal. Demikian juga perbankan syariah, pertumbuhan dan perkembangannya yang pesat, pada gilirannya diharapkan dapat berperan memberi kontribusi positif terhadap pembangunan perekonomian Indonesia. Dimensi hukum atas keberadaan Bank Syari’ah ini menjadi penting, selain sebagai dasar normatif-materiil, maka dewasa ini terutama untuk mengantisipasi adanya sengketa ekonomi syari’ah, khususnya dalam kasus perbankan. Penyelesaian melalui jalur litigasi dan non litigasi bisa menjadi pilihan sesuai kasus maupun kebutuhan.