Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wacana Hukum Jurnal Jatiswara
Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PROBLEMATIKA PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 100/PUU-XI/2013 DALAM MENDUDUKKAN PANCASILA SEBAGAI DASAR NEGARA Udiyo Basuki; Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Wacana Hukum Vol 24 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/1.jwh.2018.24.2.2713

Abstract

In the legislative system, Pancasila is a basic norm (staatsfundamental), which successively then verfassungnorm UUD 1945, grundgezetznorm or MPR provisions, and gezetznorm or the Act. But in reality, Pancasila is equalized and equated with the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, which is then referred to as the Four Pillars of Nation and State. The Constitutional Court as the constitution gatekeeper institution returns the position of the Pancasila as the state foundation through the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 100/PUU-XI/2012. The decision is part of the implementation of the authority of the Constitutional Court which has 4 (four) authorities and 1 (one) obligation as stipulated in Article 24C paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. In addition to being a guardian of democracy ) The Constitutional Court is also the Protector of the state's foundation and legal source.
MENGAGAS CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT DALAM KONSTITUSI INDONESIA DAN POLITIK HUKUM ISLAM Bambang Ali Kusumo; Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Wacana Hukum Vol 24 No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/1.jwh.2018.24.1.2995

Abstract

This paper discuss constitutional complaint as laws effort to the violation of constitutional right of civil. The protection of human basic right in the next called constitution right was the one of pure element should be contain in the constututional country. UUD 1945 as basic constitutional of Indonesia contrastly admit and protect civil right constitution, but in reality, many case which complaint to the constition departement that indicated violated constitution right because the laws spread out bay government, on the other hand all effort have done by the complainer can not be justicated. Because of that, appear the ideas of constitutional complaint. constituional complaint is constitution which complaining by the complainer because the ommision of public government which is guessed violated constitutional right of complainer. constitutional complaint in generally can be proposed if all laws effort which here has done or no laws effort again.
Penataan Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Mendukung Penguatan Konstitusi Ekonomi Indonesia Roni Sulistyanto Luhukay; Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Jatiswara Vol 34 No 2 (2019): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (548.746 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/jatiswara.v34i2.200

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh dilema penataan sistem peraturan perundang-undangan yang obesitas dan over regulated ditengah pembangunan ekonomi yang dilakukan pemerintah. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memecahkan permasalahan obesitas peraturan perundang-undangan demi keberlanjutan ekonomi bangsa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif lebih mengutamakan studi pustaka (library research) dengan fokus kajiannya asas-asas hukum, sistematika hukum, sinkronisasi hukum dan sejarah hukum, penelitian ini juga bersifat deskriptif. Penelitian ini berkesimpulan bahwa, pertama, penataan sistem peraturan perundang-undangan dalam mendukung pembangunan ekonomi nasional terhalang oleh kualitas, inkonsistensi, disharmoni dan over regulasi yang tidak diiringi oleh ketiadaan sistem yang dapat merespon dengan cepat kondisi tersebut. Kedua,cara mengatasi permasalahan tersebut adalah menggunakan reformasi regulasi dengan cara mengidentifikasi kriteria legalitas, kebutuhan dan situasional. Menginventarisasi regulasi dengan penguatan pengawasan kuantitas regulasi, pembuatan database peraturan perundang-undangan nasional dan penghapusan hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan.
Co-Authors Bambang Ali Kusumo Roni Sulistyanto Luhukay, Roni Sulistyanto Udiyo Basuki