Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Verstek
Bambang Santoso
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
UNEARTHING THE PHILOSOPHICAL ROOTS OF PANCASILA ON DISTINCTIVE LEGAL TREATMENTS FOR CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW Bambang Santoso; Soehartono .Soehartono; Muhammad Rustamaji
Yustisia Vol 6, No 2: August 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v6i2.12412

Abstract

Thus far, equality before the law is understood as an ideality without limitation and exception. Its enforceability is considered to apply indiscriminately for every law breaker. However, reality of law enforcement says differently when a perpetrator of the crime is called an early age child. Special regulations exist injustice system, law governing it as well as provisions derived from the children rights, although the child is positioned as dealing with the law. In such context of an establishment of law regarding children in conflict with the law, it is interesting to find philosophical roots of distinctive treatment negating equality before the law. The explorative step is more attractive, especially when many mosaics of conception has been discovered about what are the truths whena child is in conflict with the law: 1) violations committed by children are not purely mistakes of the children, 2) children are, nevertheless, having rights that must be fulfilled including when dealing with the law, 3) children has privileges with broad distribution of regulations in various sectors and according to the view based on Pancasila, they are keten (a link) of a nation. Such varied conceptions elicit necessity of unearthing philosophical roots, truths and realitiesthat are always plural. So that, the law established is not only be legal because it is formed in legitimate manner and by legitimate power (pedigree thesis), also incorporating theexisting basic values or moral principles, though not absolute, depending on condition of society (the moral thesis) (Twining, 2009). Thus, study of such legal products is not only be seen as the work of professional, but as Satjipto Rahardjo viewed, it is placed as an scientific object to explain that a law codified in legislation, though, is not something sacred to examine for its philosophical content.
DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN PERMOHONAN KASASI PERKARA NARKOTIKA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 2204 K/PID.SUS/2016) Muhammad Iqbal Hamam Zaidy; Bambang Santoso
Verstek Vol 10, No 1: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i1.63943

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan mendeskripsikan kesesuaian antara pertimbangan hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam mengabulkan permohonan kasasi dengan ketentuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yang bersifat preskriptif atau terapan. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum adalah dengan studi pustaka. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan diskusi yang dilakukan, penelitian ini mampu menyimpulkan dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam mengabulkan permohonan kasasi pada perkara Nomor 2204 K/Pid.Sus/2016 yaitu berdasarkan fakta-fakta yang terungkap di persidangan, serta dapat menyimpulkan bahwa alasan-alasan kasasi dijadikan dasar hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam menjatuhkan putusannya. Hakim Mahkamah Agung menganulir Putusan Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya yang berkeyakinan bahwa terdakwa memenuhi unsur-unsur pada Pasal 112 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Hakim Mahkamah Agung mengadili sendiri dengan menerapkan ketentuan Pasal 127 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.Kata kunci: pertimbangan hakim, putusan pidana, perkara narkotika.ABSTRACT: This research aims to study and describe the appropriateness of the Supreme Court's considerations in granting a request of cassation with the provisions of the Criminal Code Procedure. This study used legal research method that acted as prescriptive or applied research method. Sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Data collection technique used are literature review. Based on the research's results and discussion produced, this study is able to conclude the judge's basic considerations in granting the request of cassation on decision No. 2204 K/Pid.Sus/2016 at trial and also the reasons of cassation that are the basis of the judge to drop the verdict. The Supreme Court's judge annulled the decision of Surabaya's District Court and High Court which believed that the defendant fulfilled the requirements of Article 112 section (1) of Act No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The Supreme Court's judge adjudicated herself by applying the provisions of Article 127 section (1) letter a of Act No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.Keywords: judge considerations, granting cassation, narcotic case.
KESESUAIAN PENGGUNAAN DAKWAAN SUBSIDAIR OLEH PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA DENGAN KETENTUAN KUHAP (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 44/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN Mdn) Syahid Prakoso; Bambang Santoso
Verstek Vol 10, No 1: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i1.63937

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian penggunaan dakwaan subsidair oleh Penuntut Umum dalam penuntutan perkara tindak pidana korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa dengan ketentuan KUHAP. Penuntut Umum menggunakan dakwaan berbentuk subsidair karena Penuntut Umum ragu dalam pengkualifikasian berat ringannya tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh terdakwa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum doktrinal atau normatif. Penelitian ini bersifat perskriptif dan terapan dengan studi kasus putusan perkara tindak pidana korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa yang telah inkrach yaitu putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 44/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN Mdn. Cara pengumpulan bahan hukum dengan cara studi kepustakaan dan bahan hukum yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dari menjawab permasalahan dapat disimpulkan bahwa Penuntut Umum dalam menggunakan dakwaan yang berbentuk subsidair dalam penuntutan perkara tindak pidana korupsi pada sektor pengadaan barang dan jasa dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 44/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN Mdn telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 143 ayat (2) KUHAP karena syarat dibentuknya surat dakwaan harus memenuhi syarat formiil dan syarat materiil surat dakwaan sebagaimana yang telah diatur dalam pasal tersebut.Kata kunci : Dakwaan Subsidair; Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa; KUHAP.ABSTRACT: This study aims to determine the suitability the use of subsidair indictment by Prosecutor in case of corruption about procurement of goods and services based on Procedural Law. Prosecutor used the indictment in the form of subsidair because the Prosecutor was doubtful in qualifying the severity of the criminal act of corruption committed by the defendant. The research method used is doctrinal or normative legal research. This research is descriptive and applied with case studies of cases about corruption in procurement of goods and services that have been inkrached, namely Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 44/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN Mdn. The method of collecting legal materials by means of literature study and legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of research and discussion of answering the problem, it can be concluded that the indictment in the form of subsidair that Prosecutor used in prosecution of criminal acts of corruption in the procurement of goods and services in Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 44/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN Mdn has been in accordance with Pasal 143 ayat (2) based on Procedural Law because the requirements for the formation of the indictment must be fulfill with the formal and material requirements of the indictment as stipulated in that article.Keywords: Subsidair Indictment; Corruption in Procurement of Goods and Services; Procedural Law
Co-Authors Muhammad Iqbal Hamam Zaidy Muhammad Rustamaji Soehartono .Soehartono Syahid Prakoso