Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

KESIAPAN HAKIM PENGADILAN AGAMA DI MADURA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARI’AH Shofiyun Nahidloh
Et-Tijarie Vol 3, No 2: Desember 2016
Publisher : Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Public assumes that knowledge of the judge of religious court is moreconcentrated in marital disputes, inheritance, wills, grants, waqaf and sadaqah that be handled, rather than knowledge of sharia economy. Seeing the judge had received his various background of education levels and the representative office building conditions of the religious court, so that it would have been more ready to hear the case of economic disputes than general court. But in Madura, it does not appear yet to have a significant progress as the impact of the regulatory changes, contained in the constitution, number 7 of 1989 jo. number 3 of 2006 on the Religious Court, where there are some additional authorities to resolve some disputes in the field of shariah economic matters.Publik mengasumsikan pengetahuan hakim pengadilan agama lebih tertumpu di bidang sengketa perkawinan, waris, wasiat, hibah, waqaf dan sedekah yang ditanganinya, ketimbang pengetahuan ekonomi syariah itu sendiri. Melihat hakim telah mengenyam berbagai latar belakang jenjang pendidikan dan kondisi gedung kantor pengadilan agama yang representatif, maka pengadilan agama tentu telah dan lebih siap mengadili perkara sengketa ekonomi syariah ketimbangan pengadilan dalam lingkungan peradilan umum. Namun di wilayah Madura belum nampak adanya progress yang signifikan dari dampak adanya perubahan regulasi yang tertuang dalam dalam UU No.7 Tahun 1989 jo.UU No.3 Tahun 2006 tentang Peradilan Agama dimana ada tambahan kewenangan yaitu menyelesaikan sengketa di bidang perkara ekonomi syari’ah.Keywords: Judge PA, Dispute, Economic sharia, Madura
Childfree dalam Perkawinan Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Maqashid Asy-Syari’ah Hifdz An-Nasl Ragil Friedenta Pantow; Shofiyun Nahidloh
As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol 6 No 1 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i1.5622

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to collaborate the phenomenon of Childfree in the midst of modern society and how the perspective of Human Rights and Maqashid Ash-Sharia Hifdz An-Nasl in responding to this phenomenon. Childfree shows a cultural sign that allows marriage but supports not having children. Although Indonesia has a relatively high birth rate, problems with globalization, economic difficulties, and foreign cultures lead to certain people's beliefs that marriage does not have to have children. This research uses qualitative research to describe reality systematically with accurate preparation. The results showed that there are differences of opinion regarding the phenomenon of childfree, Human Rights Perspectives Every person or couple has a personal right to decide when and how many children they want, including the choice to become childfree. No other person or entity shall prohibit this right. And the perspective of Maqashid Ash-Sharia Hifdz An-Nasl safeguards offspring (Hifdzun nasl), as Allah Almighty commands his people, through marriage that seeks to follow the sunnah of the Prophet and abstain from adultery. This is mentioned in Q.S. An-Nisa verse 3. Thus, having offspring in Islam is a recommendation. Remembering that every married couple has the right to choose not to have children.
The Conformity of Al-Bay' bi al-Taqshīṭ Practices on Mobile Phone Credit Through Fintech Akulaku and Kredivo at Babat Counters with Sharia Principles and Regulations in Indonesia Ifatun Nikmah; Holis; Ahmad Musadad; Shofiyun Nahidloh; Imamuddin bin Nahrawi
AL-IKTISAB: Journal of Islamic Economic Law Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): AL-IKTISAB: Journal of Islamic Economic Law
Publisher : AL-IKTISAB: Journal of Islamic Economic Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/al-iktisab.v10i1.4

Abstract

The development of digital financial services has led to the increasingly widespread use of paylater facilities in consumer goods transactions, including mobile phone credit purchases through fintech platforms such as Akulaku and Kredivo, which are widely used at retail counters in Babat. Easy access, rapid processing, and minimal requirements make this practice attractive; however, its transactional structure raises issues related to cost transparency, late payment penalties, and compliance with sharia principles and national regulations. The main issue of this study concerns the form of mobile phone credit practices through these two fintech platforms and the extent to which their cost schemes, contractual arrangements, and penalty mechanisms align with the concept of al-bay’ bi al-taqshīṭ, the provisions of DSN-MUI Fatwas, and POJK No. 10/2022. This study aims to analyze the conformity of actual practices with sharia principles while also assessing their compliance with positive law. The research employs a qualitative method using an empirical juridical approach through the analysis of regulations, fatwas, academic literature, and in-depth interviews with counter employees and consumers using mobile phone credit services. The findings show that the transactions form a triangular scheme in which the counter merely supplies the goods, while all financing calculations, including additional charges and late payment penalties, are fully determined by the fintech system. Most consumers only understand the product price and installment amounts without being informed of the penalty structure, resulting in information asymmetry. The imposition of penalties as company revenue indicates non-compliance with sharia principles, as it closely resembles ribā nasī’ah, and does not fully meet OJK cost transparency standards. This study highlights the need to improve consumer education, contractual transparency, and penalty mechanisms so that paylater practices better reflect principles of justice and comply with sharia law and regulations.
Forced Selling di Kampung Inggris Pare: Uji Keabsahan Akad Berbasis Prinsip An Tarāḍin Nazwa Az Zahra; Shofiyun Nahidloh; mohammad Ali Hisyam; Ahmad Musadad
Jesya Vol 9 No 2 (2026): ARTICLES : RESEARCH JUNI 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Al-Washliyah Sibolga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36778/jesya.v9i2.2706

Abstract

Praktik forced selling oleh pedagang lokal di Kampung Inggris Pare kawasan dengan lebih dari 250 lembaga kursus dan mobilitas konsumen yang sangat tinggi menjadi persoalan muamalah yang belum banyak dikaji secara normatif. Fenomena ini ditandai oleh penjual yang secara aktif memaksa peserta kursus membeli produk, seperti alat tulis, melalui tekanan verbal, psikologis, maupun pengikatan situasional, sehingga pembeli tidak memiliki ruang yang cukup untuk menolak secara bebas. Kajian terdahulu tentang prinsip an tarāḍin mayoritas berfokus pada jual beli daring dan akad kerja sama produksi, sehingga belum menjangkau praktik penjualan paksa di ruang ekonomi lokal inilah celah yang diisi penelitian ini. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif empiris-normatif dengan data primer yang diperoleh melalui observasi lapangan dan wawancara terhadap pelaku usaha serta konsumen (peserta kursus) di Kampung Inggris Pare, Kabupaten Kediri, tahun 2026. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi tiga bentuk forced selling yang terbukti melanggar prinsip an tarāḍin: (1) tekanan verbal berulang hingga pembeli menyerah karena kelelahan, (2) tekanan psikologis melalui pemanfaatan rasa sungkan dan penempatan barang di tangan pembeli tanpa persetujuan, serta (3) pengikatan situasional yang menghilangkan ruang penolakan secara sosial. Sebaliknya, transaksi yang berlangsung secara terbuka dan tanpa tekanan dinyatakan sah menurut prinsip an tarāḍin. Kontribusi penelitian ini adalah mengoperasionalkan prinsip an tarāḍin sebagai instrumen uji normatif yang konkret untuk membedakan transaksi yang sah dari yang cacat akad, berdasarkan kualitas kerelaan bukan sekadar ada atau tidaknya persetujuan formal
Judge's Ex Officio Authority in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Without The Presence of The Defendant Civil Procedural Law Perspective Afifah Rohadatul Ais; Shofiyun Nahidloh
Et-Tijarie Vol 10, No 1: Juni 2025
Publisher : Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ete.v10i1.30404

Abstract

In the procedural law system applicable in the judicial environment, there is an ex officio right. In this case, a judge can determine a policy on a decision that is considered good and fair because of his position. Law No. 48 of 2009 emphasizes that courts must adjudicate without discrimination and are obliged to assist those seeking justice. This study aims to determine the ex officio authority of judges in resolving sharia economic disputes without the presence of the defendant from a civil law perspective, using case study 1716/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bjn. This study is a descriptive qualitative research with an empirical legal approach. The primary data source used is interview data from the panel of judges and the deputy court clerk in case 1716/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bjn, while the secondary data source is obtained from a list of references related to the material to be analyzed, namely legal documents such as laws, regulations, and court decisions. The findings of this study indicate that judges conduct trials using their ex officio authority to ensure legal effectiveness and certainty, particularly in regulating the execution of collateral objects that are not explicitly requested in the petition. Nevertheless, the judge's actions remain consistent with the principles of civil procedure law, including legal certainty, justice, and judicial proactivity within the boundaries of the authority granted. The exercise of ex officio authority demonstrates that in matters of Islamic economics, judges are not only bound by the reasons stated in the complaint but also tasked with formulating effective and enforceable decisions.