Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERBEDAAN NILAI RERATA KVP % PREDIKSI DAN KV % PREDIKSI ANTARA ORANG DENGAN INDEKS MASSA TUBUH NORMAL DAN DI ATAS NORMAL Sri Wahyu Basuki; Irkhamyudhi Primasakti; Riana Sari
Biomedika Vol 8, No 1 (2016): Biomedika Februari 2016
Publisher : Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/biomedika.v8i1.3022

Abstract

Kapasitas vital paksa (KVP) dan kapasitas vital (KV) merupakan parameter dalam pemeriksaan spirometri untuk mengetahui kelainan restriksi paru. Beberapa penelitian telah melaporkan bahwa orang IMT di atas normal memiliki kelainan restriksi pada paru mereka. Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan nilai rerata KVP % prediksi dan KV % prediksi antara orang dengan IMT normal dan di atas normal di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode analitik observasional dengan pendekatan cross sectional. Besar sampel 35 orang laki-laki 18-25 tahun tiap kelompoknya. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Perbedaan nilai rerata KVP % prediksi dan KV % prediksi dianalisis menggunakan uji hipotesis yaitu uji t dua kelompok tidak berpasangan dan Mann-Whitney dengan program SPSS 20.0 for windows.Hasil penelitian terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan nilai rerata KVP % prediksi dan KV % prediksi pada orang dengan indeks massa tubuh normal (KVP 83,9580 % dan KV 112,8063 %) dan IMT di atas normal (KVP 70,4734% dan KV 79,7374%). Hasil hipotesis uji t dua kelompok tidak berpasangan didapatkan significancy 0,000 (p0,05) dan Mann-Whitney didapatkan significancy 0,001 (p0,05). Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan nilai rerata KVP % prediksi dan KV % prediksi antara orang dengan IMT normal dan IMT di atas normal.Kata kunci: KVP % prediksi dan KV % prediksi, IMT normal dan di atas normal
Screening and Etiology of Congenital Heart Disease in Developing Countries : A Comprehensive Systematic Review Dzakiyyah Fiddin; Dhanista Hastinata Sukarna Putra; Irkhamyudhi Primasakti
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/6e8xxb74

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing number of newborns with congenital heart disease (CHD) shows that the global burden of CHD is still significant. This indicates that screening and prevention have not been carried out optimally. This study aims to determine the differences of screening and etiology of congenital heart disease (CHD) between developed and developing countries. Methods: A systematic review adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted. Studies from 2015 to 2025 focusing on the screening and etiology of CHD in developing and developed countries were included. Results: Twenty-three relevant studies were included. Combination of pulse oximetry (PO) and auscultation, or PO alone were the most common postnatal screening tools in developed and developing countries. For prenatal screening, ultrasound was commonly used. Artificial intelligence and genetic testing were only used in developed countries. The etiology such as genetics, maternal lifestyle or conditions were discussed. Conclusion: The urgent need for affordable early detection of congenital heart disease (CHD) in developing countries cannot be overstated, as it holds the potential to significantly reduce the global burden of this condition. By implementing comprehensive prenatal and postnatal screening programs, we can identify at-risk infants early, enabling timely interventions and improved health outcomes. Addressing this critical issue not only enhances individual lives but also strengthens healthcare systems and fosters healthier communities.