Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USU LAW JOURNAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH
Muhammad Ekaputra
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDAN (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 27/Pid.Sus-Anak/2014/PN.Mdn) Khairul Anwar Hasibuan; Marlina Marlina; Muhammad Ekaputra; Edy Ikhsan
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 4, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (600.201 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Indonesia as a State Party in the Convention on the Rights of the Child governing the principle of legal protection for the child is obliged to provide special protection to children in conflict with the law. One of the forms of child protection is realized through special criminal justice system for children in conflict with the law. This is confirmed in the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice. The findings show that, the first is the legal protection of children as perpetrators of criminal acts is indispensable because it is useful for: 1) Children are not stablephysically and mentally, 2) To ensure the children freed from inhuman or demeaningpunishment, 3 ) To ensure the independence of the child, so as not seized unlawfully or arbitrarily, 4) To ensure that the criminal (penalty) applies only as an ultimumremedium; the second is the legal protection should be given to the child is the legal protection that covers several concepts as follows: 1) The concept of Restorative Justice; and 2) Concept of Diversy. The third isthe child criminal liability based on the judge's decision are as follows: Accepting an appeal from lawyer and public prosecutor of the child; strengtheningdecision ofMedan District Court No.:27/Pid.SUS.Anak/2014/PN.Mdn; Establish the length of children detained entirely deducted from the sentence imposed; Ordered the child remains in custody; Charge a second child in the case of judicial level, which is in the level of appeal for Rp.2.500,00 (Two thousand five hundred rupiahs).   Keywords : Legal Protection , Responsibility , Children Actors Crime.
DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN ONLINE (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2593/ PID.SUS/ 2022/PN.MDN DAN PUTUSAN NO. 14/ PID.B/2016/ PN.TBK Multa Hadi; Edi Yunara; Muhammad Ekaputra
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): May 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i2.3060

Abstract

Abstract: This study explores the disparity in judicial decisions on online gambling criminal cases, focusing on two verdicts: Decision No. 2593/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Mdn and Decision No. 14/Pid.B/2016/PN.Tbk. Although both defendants were charged with relatively similar offenses, significant differences were found in the legal bases applied and the outcomes of the rulings. This research adopts a normative juridical approach using literature review and document analysis techniques. The findings reveal that the disparity stems from differences in legal interpretation among judges, inconsistency in the application of legal provisions, and the absence of standardized sentencing guidelines. The study recommends the development of consistent sentencing frameworks to ensure legal justice for online gambling offenders. Keywords: Sentencing Disparity, Criminal Offense, Online Gambling, Judge, Electronic                  Information Law Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas disparitas putusan hakim terhadap perkara tindak pidana perjudian online berdasarkan studi terhadap dua putusan pengadilan, yaitu Putusan No. 2593/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Mdn dan Putusan No. 14/Pid.B/2016/PN.Tbk. Meskipun kedua terdakwa didakwa atas tindak pidana yang relatif serupa, terdapat perbedaan signifikan dalam dasar hukum yang digunakan dan putusan yang dijatuhkan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan dan dokumentasi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa disparitas putusan timbul akibat perbedaan interpretasi hukum oleh hakim, tidak konsistennya penerapan pasal, serta kurangnya pedoman yang seragam dalam menangani kasus sejenis. Studi ini merekomendasikan pentingnya penyusunan pedoman pemidanaan agar tercipta keadilan hukum yang lebih konsisten bagi terdakwa tindak pidana perjudian online. Kata kunci: Disparitas Putusan, Tindak Pidana, Perjudian Online, Hakim, UU ITE 
Co-Authors Edi Yunara Edy Ikhsan Khairul Anwar Hasibuan Marlina Marlina Multa Hadi