Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Rechtsidee Pembaharuan Hukum JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law Dicky Eko Prasetio; Fradhana Putra Disantara; Nadia Husna Azzahra; Dita Perwitasari
Rechtsidee Vol 8 (2021): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702

Abstract

The Sendi customary community is a community that has procedures for implementing customary law through the customary justice system. Not only that, the Sendi customary community also has a distinctive legal code and customary apparatus; so that its existence needs to be maintained in the face of the era of legal modernization. This research is an empirical legal research; by using secondary data types obtained from various searches for journal articles, books, and information through online news online; relating to the substance of the research. The purpose of this research is to describe the structure of Sendi's customary court in maintaining the existence of customary law; as well as describing the strategy of legal pluralism in Sendi's customary court to face modernization of law era. This empirical legal research focuses on the structure of Sendi's customary court with an approach of legal pluralism. The results of the study confirm that a legal pluralism strategy is needed to maintain the existence of the Sendi traditional court in the era of legal modernization; and integration efforts are needed between the law and the customary apparatus of Sendi with the law and the national or state apparatus.
THE LARGE SCALE SOCIAL RESTRICTIONS POLICY FOR HANDLING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC Fradhana Putra Disantara
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v7i2.9429

Abstract

This legal research uses a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. This research was carried out by inventorying primary and secondary materials, so as to obtain an appropriate analysis and critical review of published legal issues. The purpose of the study was to analyze the dynamics of Large Scale Social Restrictions Policies, especially regarding the Regulation of Minister of Health Number 9 of 2020and analyze various problematic PSBB policies during the pandemic. This study states that the PSBB is different from regional quarantine. On the other hand, the PSBB regulation in the Regulation of Minister of Health Number 9 of 2020  also raises doubts.Then,the Chief of Police's Declaration Mak/2/III/2020 provided strong legitimacy to strengthen the PSBB policy in terms of public compliance.The PSBB policy by the Central and Regional Governments has left various problems. Starting from material errors, contradiction of the article in the Governor's Regulation, and the Governor's Regulation which is not based on the Law above. The solution that can be done is to revise the Government Regulation No. 21 of 2020 and conduct executive review of the Governor's Regulation. 
The Validity of Rector’s Circular Letter on the Covid-19 Pandemic Fradhana Putra Disantara
UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/unifikasi.v7i1.2765

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relevance of the ‘health emergency’ status to the existing legal theory and condition as well as to identify the validity of the Circular Letter of the Rector of State Universities. To this end, this study applied the statute and conceptual approach. The study was conducted by inventorying primary and secondary legal materials to obtain a proper and critical review of the legal issues under study. The results showed that the determination of the ‘health emergency’ status by the government was inappropriate due to the uncertainty of the regulations issued by the government to determine the current condition. Thus, the status of the COVID-19 pandemic is a ‘legal emergency’ status. Further, the Rector’s policy through the Circular Letter is valid judicially, sociologically, and philosophically. The determination of the ‘legal emergency’ status can be done by issuing a Perppu without a ‘state of emergency’ from the President. Finally, it is suggested to firstly get an approval from the Ministry of Education and Culture regarding the issuance of the Rector’s Circular Letter. Besides, further study is needed as this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Keabsahan Surat Edaran Rektor Perguruan Tinggi dalam Pandemi Covid-19Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa relevansi status ‘darurat kesehatan’ dengan teori hukum dan kondisi yang ada dan keabsahan atas Surat Edaran Rektor Perguruan Tinggi Negeri. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah statute approach dan conseptual approach. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menginventarisasi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, guna mendapatkan kajian yang seyogianya dan telaah kritis terkait isu hukum. Hasil penelitian menyatakan penetapan status darurat kesehatan oleh pemerintah kurang tepat, dikarenakan tidak menentu-nya peraturan yang dikeluarkan oleh pemerintah untuk menetapkan kondisi saat ini. Sehingga, status pandemi COVID-19 merupakan status darurat hukum. Kebijakan rektor melalui Surat Edaran adalah absah secara aspek yuridis, sosiologis, dan filosofis. Penetapan darurat hukum cukup dilakukan dengan menerbitkan Perppu tanpa pernyataan darurat dari Presiden. Saran peneliti adalah di perlukan persetujuan pada Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan terkait terbitnya Surat Edaran Rektor, dan dibutuhkan penelitian lebih lanjut dikarenakan penelitian ini dilakukan pada masa COVID-19 yang bersifat temporal. 
TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 Fradhana Putra Disantara
JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 6, No 1 (2020): JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33760/jch.v6i1.262

Abstract

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic encourages the government to take various strategic steps to accelerate the handling of COVID-19. One of the strategic policies undertaken by the government is the implementation of Large-Scale Social Restrictions in various cities or districts in Indonesia. However, this abnormal policy does not mean abandoning government responsibility for all lines of community life. This legal research is aimed at analyzing the state's responsibilities in the COVID-19 pandemic and also providing formulations related to future law (ius constituendum) on the state of emergency national law. This legal research uses the statute approach and conceptual approach. Primary and secondary legal materials used in this legal research are inventoried in order to obtain proper studies and provide critical study of the legal issues discussed. The results of the study stated that state responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic had been legitimized by existing national and international legal provisions. The Large-Scale Social Restrictions Policy (PSBB) should not derogate the principle rights of the community. For this reason, the responsibility of the state must be optimized because the community has a central position in a country. Then, a new formulation is needed as an umbrella act in the regulation of national emergency status. This is because existing laws are not relevant to current conditions.
Co-Authors Dicky Eko Prasetio Dita Perwitasari Nadia Husna Azzahra