Amelia Lindawati
Akuntan PT Aneka Kimia Inti

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Myths of Chinese New Year Traditions Viewed from Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Theory: Indonesian LINDAWATI, AMELIA; Listyo Yuwanto
Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora) Vol 8 No 2 (2024): SANTHET: (JURNAL SEJARAH, PENDIDIKAN DAN HUMANIORA) 
Publisher : Proram studi pendidikan Sejarah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/santhet.v8i2.4632

Abstract

This study aims to explore how myths in the Chinese New Year celebration traditions reflect or represent the levels of needs in Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory. Indonesia, as a country with diverse ethnicities and cultures, has a Chinese ethnic community that celebrates Chinese New Year as an important tradition. This celebration not only functions as a cultural ritual but also fulfills basic human needs. Based on a literature review method, this study analyzes various myths and traditions of Chinese New Year and relates them to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, including physiological needs, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. The results show that the Chinese New Year tradition plays a significant role in fulfilling these needs. Rituals such as family dinners, house cleaning, and giving red envelopes not only meet basic needs but also create a sense of security, love, and esteem within the Chinese ethnic community. Furthermore, this study applies Hofstede's cultural dimensions to deepen the understanding of how the Chinese New Year tradition supports the structure and cultural values of the Chinese, as well as its contribution to psychological and social well-being. This research provides valuable insights for cultural anthropology and social psychology studies and enriches appreciation for the existing cultural heritage.Keywords: Myth, Chinese New Year, Chinese, Psychology, Maslow
PENGARUH MEKANISME CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN Lindawati, Amelia
Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer Vol. 2 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33508/jako.v2i1.435

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanism that consists of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and size of the board of directors on the financial performance through the agency cost. The object of this research is the manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2007-2009. The sample used in this study as many as 41 companies selected by purposive sampling method. Secondary data obtained from the company's annual financial statements and then processed using the method of path analysis. The results showed that managerial ownership has no effect on financial performance through the agency cost, while institutional ownership and board size effect on financial performance through the agency cost.
Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Lindawati, Amelia
Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer Vol. 2 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33508/jako.v2i1.1025

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanism that consists of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and size of the board of directors on the financial performance through the agency cost. The object of this research is the manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2007-2009. The sample used in this study as marry as 41 companies selected by purposive sampling method. Secondary data obtained from the company's annual financial statements and then processed using the method of path analysis. The results showed that managerial ownership has no effect on financial performance through the agency cost, while institutional ownership and board size effect on financial performance through the agency cost.