Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

RECHTVINDING TENTANG WARIS BEDA AGAMA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KOTA BANDUNG Siah Khosyi'ah; Aah Tsamrotul Fuadah
Asy-Syari'ah Vol 21, No 2 (2019): Asy-Syari'ah
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/as.v21i2.4706

Abstract: Normatively inheritance with different religions is hindered from inheritance rights because religious differences between heirs and heirs or vice versa cause someone not to inherit from each other. However, in line with the development of Islamic legal thinking the discovery of inheritance laws of different religions by judges in the Religious Courts is something that is not impossible to do ijtihad in order to fulfill a sense of justice in accordance with the objectives of the law. The purpose of this study was to find out the legal findings of judges about inheritance of different religions in the Bandung Religious Court in line with the demands of justice seekers about heirs of different religions. This study uses the Normative Juridical method which means that this research will be seen from the values that evolve in Islamic law, including in the view of legislation and content analysis, with a normative juridical approach. The data found in this study are the thoughts of judges who are bound by prevailing legal norms as outlined in the form of verdicts and stipulations. The results of this study conclude that judges do not rule out the possibility of finding a new law regarding interfaith inheritance by giving inheritance rights to different religious heirs if desired by the heirs by carrying out various legal interpretations and adhering to the legal objectives of the principle of benefit, the principle of justice and the benefit principle for heirs.Abstrak: Secara normatif kewarisan yang berbeda agama terhalang atas hak waris karena beda agama antara pewaris dengan ahli waris atau sebaliknya menyebabkan seseorang tidak saling mewaris. Namun, sejalan dengan berkembangnya pemikiran hukum Islam penemuan hukum waris beda agama oleh para hakim di Pengadilan Agama adalah sesuatu yang tidak mustahil untuk melakukan ijtihad dalam rangka memenuhi rasa keadilan sesuai dengan tujuan hukum. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui penemuan hukum hakim tentang waris beda agama di Pengadilan Agama Kota Bandung sejalan dengan tuntutan para pencari keadilan tentang ahli waris yang berbeda agama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Yuridis Normatif artinya penelitian ini akan dilihat dari nilai-nilai yang berkembanmg dalam hukum Islam termasuk dalam pandangan perundang-undangan. Juga yurisprudensi yang dapat dijadikan sumber hukum dalam memutuskan perkara yang sama yang datang dikemudian hari Untuk itu penelitian ini metode yang digunakan adalah analisis isi (content analysis), dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Data yang ditemukan dalam penelitian ini berupa pemikiran para hakim yang terikat dengan norma-norma hukum yang berlaku yang dituangkan dalam bentuk putusan maupun penetapan, adapun ijtihad hakim dalam memberikan pertimbangan atas perkara yang diajukan pertama, berdasarkan pada hukum tertulis dan tidak tertulis, kemudian yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung. Hasil Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa hakim tidak menutup kemungkinan menemukan hukum baru tentang waris beda agama dengan memberikan hak waris kepada ahli waris beda agama jika dikehendaki oleh ahli waris dengan melakukan berbagai penafsiran hukum dan berpegang pada tujuan hukum yakni asas manfaat, asas keadilan dan asas kemaslahatan bagi para ahli waris.

PENYELESAIAN WARISAN MELALUI HIBAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM Siah Khosyi'ah; M. Asro
Asy-Syari'ah Vol 23, No 1 (2021): Asy-Syari'ah
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/as.v23i1.12755

Abstract: This paper departs from the different concepts between grants and inheritance. A grant is a form of transfer of property from a person (grantor) to another person (grantee) which is carried out while the grantor is still alive with the maximum amount of 1/3 of the inheritance. The grantee may come not only from the grantor’s heir, but also from other party, whether a person or a legal person. While inheritance is the transfer of property from a deceased person to their heir with the provisions that have been stated in the Qur'an and hadith, and other applicable legislation. The descriptive method with normative judicial approach was applied to describe how grants might become one of resolutions for inheritance-related conflict. The research found that some part of community distributes inheritance while the testator is still alive in order to avoid dispute between heirs. This practice is based on custom or simply due to lack of knowledge on Islamic inheritance provision. It can be concluded that the inheritance may be distributed while the testator is still alive through the concept of grant, as long as there is an agreement between the heirs. Whenever a dispute occurs after the grantor deceased, the distributed assets can be withdrawn and taken into account as inheritance.Abstrak: Tulisan ini berangkat dari konsep yang berbeda antara hibah dengan waris. Hibah merupakan bentuk perpindahan harta dari seseorang (pemberi hibah) kepada orang lain (penerima hibah) ketika pemberi hibah masih hidup dengan batasan yang disepakati maksimal sampai 1/3 dari harta peninggalan. Penerima hibah tersebut tidak hanya ahli waris tetapi bisa orang lain baik secara perorangan maupun lembaga atau organisasi yang dilaksanakan. Sementara waris merupakan perpindahan harta dari orang yang sudah meninggal dunia kepada ahli waris dengan ketentuan yng sudah tercantum dalam al-Qur’an maupun hadist atau dalam ketentuan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Metode ynag digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah metode deskriftif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif yang bertujuan untuk menggambarkan hibah sebagai penyelesaian waris. Ditemukan dalam masyarakat bagaimana pembagian warisan dilakukan ketika si pewaris masih hidup. Adapun alasannya antara lain agar tidak terjadi sengketa diantara ahli waris, karena faktor pemahaman keagamaan masyarakat yang masih kurang terhadap kewarisan Islam, atau karena kebiasaan yang terjadi dimasyarakat. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa penyelesaian waris bisa dilakukan dengan cara membaginya ketika pewaris masih hidup melalui konsep hibah, selama adanya kesepakatan diantara ahli waris. Jika terjadi sengketa setelah meninggalnya pemberi hibah, maka harta hibah yang diberikan ketika hidup dan dinilai sebagai warisan dapat ditarik kembali dan diperhitungkan sebagai warisan.

Absolute Competence in the Fields of Alms in the Religious Courts Siah Khosyi'ah; Royhan Aziz Ghifari; Mohamad Sar’an; Ah Fathonih
International Journal of Islamic Khazanah Vol 11, No 2 (2021): IJIK
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

This research aims to investigate the absolute competence in the fields of alms in the Religious Court in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative juridical research with the type of prescriptive analysis of research, namely studying the purpose of the law, the values of justice, the validity of the rule of law, legal concepts, and legal norms. This research found that the case of alms has never appeared. It can happen because alms cases are resolved through non-litigation. The settlement of alms disputes has likely been completed up to the zakat management institution's level, and alms has become part of Islam's teachings. It is necessary o cooperate with other institutions in resolving it legally. Besides that, there is a need for legislation that provides opportunities to solve alms' problem does not clash with its legal aspects.

Society's Perspectives on Contemporary Islamic Law in Indonesia through Social Media Analysis Technology: A Preliminary Study Dian Sa'adillah Maylawati; Siah Khosyi'ah; Achmad Kholiq
International Journal of Islamic Khazanah Vol 12, No 1 (2022): IJIK
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

The social, cultural, and technological developments of society are unavoidable. This has an impact on the development of Islamic Law, which keeps all Muslim activities in the right corridor. Contemporary Islamic law, known as Contemporary Islamic Law, has also developed to answer new societal problems. Various views on Contemporary Islamic Law in solving multiple issues certainly reap various responses from the community and scholars. These views are often conveyed through social media such as Youtube, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Therefore, this article aims to discuss a preliminary study of text analysis techniques used to find out the views of the community and Ulama on Contemporary Islamic Law issues computationally and automatically. This initial study reviews the methods and techniques that will be used, namely the Indonesian National Work Competency Standards (SKKNI) methodology for data science. This study will also use a sentiment analysis approach, topic modeling, and pattern analysis to find out people's views on issues of Contemporary Islamic Law through social media. The algorithm used for sentiment analysis is the Multinomial Naïve Bayes Classifier (MNBC), for topic modeling is Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), while for pattern analysis using the Prefix-projected Sequential Pattern Mining (PrefixSpan) algorithm. The model generated from sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and pattern analysis will be evaluated by measuring the confusion matrix, coherence value, and silhouette coefficient value. In addition, analysis and interpretation of the model results will be carried out in-depth qualitatively by involving the views and thoughts of Islamic Law experts.

The Portrait of Children Custody Rights in Indonesia: A Study of Mother's Rights in Child Custody from Gender Perspective Mohamad Salman Podungge; Siah Khosyi'ah
Khazanah Sosial Vol 4, No 3 (2022): Khazanah Sosial Vol 4, No 3 October 2022
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Divorce separates not only husband and wife but also parents and children. After the divorce, the role of the mother is identified as the best caregiver for the child. While the father's role is only limited to providing for the child's needs. The question is "whether a mother is the only one with custody rights of a child who has not been mumayiz or is not 12 years old yet? The study was carried out in a descriptive juridical method, with a gender approach, from two things: (1) the normative basis for determining child custody after divorce and (2) determining child custody for the father in a religious court. The findings of this study proved that caring for unmarried children is not the absolute right of a mother. Fathers also have the same rights, even more than a mother. The principle of "the best interest of the child" can be easily enforced by placing the custody rights of the father and mother equally.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search