Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pekommas Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Komunikasi dan Informatika
nfn Karman
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
DIGITAL CITIZENSHIP SAFETY AMONG CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS IN INDONESIA Gati Gayatri; Udi Rusadi; Siti Meiningsih; Dede Mahmudah; Diana Sari; nfn Kautsarina; nfn Karman
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Komunikasi dan Informatika Vol 6, No 1 (2015): JPPKI
Publisher : Puslitbang Literasi dan Profesi SDM Komunikasi dan Informatika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The study on Digital Citizenship Safety among Children and Adolescents in Indonesia aims to provide vital knowledge on how children and adolescents in Indonesia use social media and digital technology, and why they use those communication channels as well as the potential risks they might face in doing so. The data collection process of the policy research had been carried out in two years, from 2011 to 2012. Results of the study are expected to guide future policies to protect the rights of children to access information and, and at the same time, to share information and express their views or ideas in digital safety. For this, a randomized sample of children and adolescents aged 10-19 (400 in total) was taken spread across the country and spanning a mixture of urban and rural areas. The study finds that social and digital media use is an integral and growing part of the everyday life of young Indonesians. Almost all of the children and adolescents surveyed know about the Internet and most of them are Internet users. For those who are not Internet users, the number is very small. the most common reasons given are that they do not have the equipment or infrastructure to access the Internet or that they are forbidden by their parents to do so. Children and adolescents tend to use personal computers to access internet at internet cafes/vendors and school computer laboratories; laptops at home; and – above all – mobile phones or smartphones during their daily activities. They have three key motivations to access the Internet: to seek information, to connect to friends (old and new) and to be entertained. Their search for information is often driven by school assignments, while their use of social media and entertainment content is driven by their personal preference. The vast majority of their communication is with their peers, followed by their teachers, and that their communication with family members on the Internet is fairly insignificant.Keywords: Adolescent, Children, Digital citizenship, Digital media
CONSTRUCTION OF SOCIAL REALITY AS THOUGHT MOVEMENT (Theoretical Review On Social Construction of Reality Peter L. Berger) nfn Karman
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Komunikasi dan Informatika Vol 5, No 3 (2015): JPPKI
Publisher : Puslitbang Literasi dan Profesi SDM Komunikasi dan Informatika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The concept of constructivism/constructionism is vague but very influential to knowledge. The thoughts in line with it are social construction of reality, social constructionism, social constructionist, social constructivism, social constructivist. Simply, they’re called social construction or coconstruction. One model of this theory is the one introduced by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann. This theory was also known as dialectic theory. Hence, this article will discuss about the main idea or thought of Peter L. Berger. The main ideas are society as objective and subjective reality. This article also presents limitedness of this theory and criticism against it.Keywords : social construction of reality theory; Peter L. Berger; constructivism; constructionism; coconstruction.
FRAME OF HIZBUT TAHRIR INDONESIA (HTI) AS A FUNDAMENTALIS GROUP IN THE DISCOURSE OF DEMOCRACY IN ONLINE MEDIA nfn Karman
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Komunikasi dan Informatika Vol 6, No 1 (2015): JPPKI
Publisher : Puslitbang Literasi dan Profesi SDM Komunikasi dan Informatika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia is a democratic country. Therefore, Indonesia conducts periodic general election every five years since 1955. Indonesia has variety/difersity of culture . That one gives different attitude toward democracy both as a system or as an ideology. One of the attitude is the expression of a rejection against democracy. One of organizations/groups rejecting democracy is Hizb Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). It articulates its rejection to democracy through online media (website). This research tries to find frames on HTI’s websites regarding discourse of democracy. Method of this study is qualitative-content analysis, using agenda setting theory at the second level (level frame). In looking for news, this research used key words: “pemilihan umum/general election”, “demokrasi/democracy”. The result finds four (4) main frames in its websites: (1) the frame of democracy as a tool of capitalism and colonialism; (2) Frame of Indonesian government as an colonialist’s cat’s paw; (3) frame of democracy as a shield of non-Muslims; (4). frame of democracy as a system that make people in misery. In this study, researcher doesn’t dealt with interesting topics because of the limitations of the method/tool used. Therefore, for further studies, it needs to deepen this issue. Coverage of research should not be limited to only HTI but other muslim organizations.Keywords: Frame; Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia; fundamentalist; discourse; democracy.
Kontestasi Frame Surat Kabar National dalam Liputan “Aksi Bela Islam” nfn Karman
Jurnal Pekommas Vol 2, No 1 (2017): April 2017
Publisher : BBPSDMP KOMINFO MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30818/jpkm.2017.2020109

Abstract

This article deals with how daily newspapers of Indonesia frame reality of the collective action of Muslims. That action becomes a magnet for national and international mass media because involving a large number of Muslim, and has a problem complexity (legal, politic, religion) and political interests (contestation for Jakarta governor). The media gets involved in that complexity because they are harnessed as a political instrument, by conducting framing. This study aims to find daily newspaper frame by analyzing the content qualitativly. Those newspapers are Kompas, Republika, Suara pembaruan, and Media Indonesia during November 2016. By analyzing their editorials, we find that their frames regarding Muslim collective action are different to each other. Even, frames of Republika and Suara Pembaruan are contested. Republika regards the Muslim action as a respond to get justice and basic right because of their religion blasphemy. Republika considers it as a legal issue. Suara Pembaruan views the Muslim action as a political issue (governor election of DKI Jakarta), which makes use of religion issue. Media Indonesia sees the action as a political issue as well. Kompas regards it as political and religion issue. We conclude that although expected to be impartial –as part of democratic values, mass media keep in-partiality in crucial issues e.g., religion. This study gives our understanding that mass media can be partial in the certain contexts. Tulisan ini membahas bagaimana surat kabar harian membingkai realitas aksi umat Islam. Aksi tersebut menarik pemberitaan media massa nasional dan internasional karena melibatkan muslim dalam jumlah besar, memiliki kompleksitas persoalan (hukum, politik, agama, dan kepentingan), yaitu kontestasi pemilihan gubernur Jakarta 2017. Media terlibat dalam kompleksitas tersebutdan digunakan sebagai instrumen, yaitu politik pemberitaan. Kajian ini bertujuan menemukan bingkai surat kabar harian nasional dengan melakukan analisis isi kualitatif terhadap surat kabar nasional, yaitu: Kompas, Republika, Suara Pembaruan, dan Media Indonesia selama periode November 2016. Dengan menganalisis tajuk rencana mereka, kajian menemukan bahwa frame surat kabar di Indonesia berbeda satu sama lain. Frame surat kabar Republika dan Suara Pembaruan bahkan saling bertentangan. Republika menganggap aksi umat Islam sebagai respon untuk memperoleh keadilan dan hak asasi karena penistaan agama mereka (masalah hukum). Suara Pembaruan melihat aksi sebagai masalah politik (pemilihan gubernur DKI Jakarta) yang menggunakan isu agama. Media Indonesia melihat aksi juga sebagai masalah politik. Kompas melihat aksi sebagai persoalan agama dan politik. Kajian  menyimpulkan bahwa walaupun diharapkan tidak memihak sebagai bagian dari nilai-nilai demokrasi, media massa tetap saja memihak dalam isu yang krusial seperti agama. Penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman bahwa media umum sekalipun bisa menjadi media partisan pada konteks tertentu.
Co-Authors Dede Mahmudah Diana Sari Gati Gayatri nfn Kautsarina Siti Meiningsih Udi Rusadi