Helza Nova Lita
Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE EUROPEAN UNION DISTINCTIVENESS: A CONCEPT OF THE RULE OF LAW Adnan Mahmutovic; Helza Nova Lita
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Diponegoro Law Review October 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (576.073 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.6.2.2021.157-171

Abstract

This paper discusses the distinctiveness of the European Union with focus on the Rule of Law and its importance for the EU integration process. Rule of Law is a notion that is very frequently used, but at the same time quite controversial as it is not so easy always to reach generally accepted meaning. Therefore, this paper provides a analysis of the EU Rule of Law  as multidimensional legal principle gravitating between values and principles. The paper acknowledges that a concept of the EU rule of law can be the subject of diverse interpretations and implementation. High-ranking government officials of a two EU member states, Poland and Hungary, have argued recently that a concept of the EU rule of law lacks well-defined rules and remains the subject of much debate. Therefore, the paper provides for better understanding of the concept itself within the specific supranational legal environment. Also, the paper argues that the future of the EU and its integrations depends largely on the respect of the rule of law that remains to be a core and the element of unity within Europe’s legal space. The relationship between the principles and values upon which the EU is founded remain close and interrelated. The EU Rule of law with all its distinctiveness can be concluded with certainty that it reflects a specific character and nature of the EU legal system.
Choice of Islamic Law in Settlement of International Economic Disputes Helza Nova Lita; Norazlina Abdul Azis; Adnan Mahmutovic; Nun Harrieti; Romidon Hidayat
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14058

Abstract

The freedom to choose forum institutions and legal options in resolving business disputes is a freedom to contract exercised by national and international business actors, likewise in settling Islamic economic business disputes. This freedom of contract is recognized both in the principles of international trade law and Islamic law. The present development of sharia business transactions at the national and international levels does not rule out the possibility of disputes in its implementation. The consistency of implementing Islamic economics also concerns the choice of Islamic law, which is used as a choice of law for international business actors in case of a dispute between them. Studying how specific Islamic law can be applied to each country's national law is interesting. This article will discuss how Islamic law can be chosen to settle international business disputes using a normative juridical approach. Choice of law is the law the parties choose to resolve disputes between them, which can be expressed in their business contracts. The choice of law chosen by these parties in the settlement of international business disputes will also be closely related to the principles of Private International Law in harmonizing with the provisions of the National Law of each country. There needs to be mutual agreement from both countries, as well as international forums or institutions, especially international trade institutions, to support the recognition of the application of Islamic legal principles in resolving international business disputes through international agreements both bilaterally and multilaterally.