Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian
JEMMY RINALDI
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS PEMASARAN DAN TATANIAGA ANGGUR DI BALI SUHARYANTO -; IDA AYU PUTU PARWATI; JEMMY RINALDI
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 8, No. 1 Februari 2008
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (156.68 KB)

Abstract

Bali grape, especially that effort at Buleleng district is one of local specific commodity thathas great potency to be developed. Marketing aspect is important to support the increasing ofgrape farmer’s income. The number of trading institution that involved to grape marketingwill influence to the length of market chain and the amount of market cost. The amount ofmarket cost will point to the higher difference prices between producer farmer and consumer.For that purpose, analysis of marketing and trading of grape was conducted at Bulelengdistrict. The research location was selected using purposive sampling technique at location of‘Primatani Renovasi’ assessment at Gerokgak sub district, Buleleng. The research was donefrom August to December 2005 using survey method to 50 grape farmers that selectedrandomly and 20 grape traders that selected using snowball sampling technique. Data wasanalyzed descriptively to financial feasibility, market channeling, market margin, marketintegration, and elasticity of price transmission. The result showed that grape farming systemat Gerokgak sub district had well enough prospective. It was indicated by the increasing ofincome per year and BCR value that has tendency to increase year by year. There was 4 grapemarket channeling model at Buleleng, i. e.: Model 1: farmer – commission agent – collectingtrader – retailer – consumer was 14%; Model 2: farmer – collecting trader – retailer –consumer was 44%; Model 3: farmer – collecting trader – district level trader – retailer –consumer was 34%; and Model 4: farmer – retailer – consumer was 8%. The highest marketmargin was gained by Model 1 (3600 rps/kg), followed by Model 3 (3450 rps/kg) and Model2 (3350 rps/kg). While, the highest share accepted by farmer was for Model 3, i. e. 37,89%,followed by Model 2 (33%) and Model 1 (31%). Market integration degree between market atfarmer level and market at consumer level was low, with coefficient value was 0,199. Valueof elasticity of price transmission was 0,457%. Marketing function done by grape marketexecutor included changing function (buying and selling), physically function (transportation,distribution, and storage), facility function (grading and packing); without certification andlabelling.
ESTIMASI POTENSI DAN NILAI EKONOMIS PUPUK KANDANG DI BALI SUHARYANTO -; JEMMY RINALDI
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 5, No. 3 November 2005
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (40.954 KB)

Abstract

The potential of dry land area for agricultural is quite big. The advantages of manureas an alternative it could be possible since the number of livestock such as cow, chicken andgoat is quite potential. The total production of solid manure in 2001 are 1.313.794,12 metricton cow manure, 284.484,35 metric ton chicken manure and 33.374,28 metric ton goatmanure. This amount can be used 25 percent dry land area in Bali and give surplus 100percent of fishpond area. The contributions of Nitrogen, Phosphate and Kalium for everycategory that produce from cow manure are 3.673,3 metric ton N, 2.626,7 metric ton P2O5 and1.309,2 metric ton K2O. Chicken manure contributes 1.988,6 N, 2.275,2 metric ton P2O5 and1.133,9 metric ton K2O and goat manure contains 212, 3 metric ton N, 166, 6 metric ton K2Oand 149, 5 metric ton K2O. If we compare the manure with chemical fertilizers it is similarwith 3.265.11 metric ton Urea, 6.912.42 metric ton SP-36 and 2.380.29 metric ton KCl forcow manure. The production of Chicken manure is equal to 1.767.60 metric ton urea,5.987.34 metric ton SP-36 and 2.984.07 metric ton KCl and for goat manure is equal to488.664 metric ton urea, 701.970 metric ton SP-36 and 271.789 metric ton KCl.
Co-Authors IDA AYU PUTU PARWATI Maemonah, Maemonah Muhammad Rivai