Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
I Ketut Bayu Pawana
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
FIT AND PROPER TEST FOR PUBLIC THE OFFICIALS CANDIDATE PERSPECTIVE ON CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS I Ketut Bayu Pawana
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 2, No 2 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (281.664 KB) | DOI: 10.12345/ius.v2i5.166

Abstract

Constitution Amendments in 1999-2002,  significantly changing the constitutional system of Indonesia. One  of amendments aspect in constitution that is more empowering Parliament functions,  beside their main function there is a new  parliament authority that is involvement in the determination of public officials. Such Involvement is limited by the authority of “election” and “consent”. In fact,  the Law Number 3 Year 2009 on the Supreme Court and the Law Number 18 Year 2011 on the Judicial Commission setting up  the two forms of authority of the House of Representatives that is “choosing“ to the fit and proper test mechanisms. The emergence acted upon the authority of the House of Representatives for the fit and proper test for public officer candidate constituted by the strengthening of the role and functions of Parliament are given by the Constitution,  mechanism of checks and balances that govern the relationship between the state institutions are equal and mutually control each other. Fit and proper test is the determination mechanism of public officials by the House of Representatives. However,  the suitability of the authority of Parliament to implement fit and proper tests of public officials candidate of the Constitution of 1945 stipulated NRI deviant or contrary to Law Number 3 Year 2009 on the Supreme Court and the Law Number 18 Year 2011. Constitution mandate only on the authority to give consent but  by Law Number 18 Year 2011 and Law Number 3 Year 2009 is lead up to the authority to choose by fit and proper test mechanism.Keywords: Authority Parliament and Fit and Proper Test
Evaluasi Kepuasan Pemustaka Terhadap Layanan Perpustakaan IPDN Kampus NTB: Studi Tahun 2025 I Wayan Wijanaraga; I Ketut Bayu Pawana
THE LIGHT : Journal of Librarianship and Information Science Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): THE LIGHT : Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Publisher : UIN Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/light.v5i2.14477

Abstract

This study is motivated by the importance of evaluating user satisfaction as part of the effort to improve library service quality in higher education institutions, particularly at IPDN NTB Campus. In an era of governance that demands transparency and accountability, user satisfaction has become a key indicator within the internal quality assurance system (SPMI) and serves as a basis for formulating service development policies. The aim of this research is to measure the level of user satisfaction with the library services at IPDN NTB Campus in 2025, analyze trends in comparison with previous periods (2018, 2021, 2022, and 2024), and identify aspects that need improvement. The study employed a descriptive quantitative survey method using a questionnaire based on nine elements of public service standards issued by the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform (Kementerian PAN-RB), including procedures, requirements, service time, cost/tariffs, service products, staff competence, staff behavior, facilities/infrastructure, and complaint handling. Data were analyzed quantitatively to obtain the average User Satisfaction Index (IKP) score for each element and its trend over time. The results indicate that, overall, the library services at IPDN NTB Campus in 2025 are rated as excellent. Eight out of nine service elements showed an increase in score compared to previous periods, with the highest achievement in the cost/tariff element (3.8732) and the lowest in the facilities/infrastructure element (3.5915), which experienced a slight decrease from the previous year but remained in the “excellent” category. Longitudinal comparisons highlight continuous improvements in procedural aspects, service speed, librarian competence, and responsiveness to feedback. These findings confirm the effectiveness of the implemented service quality improvement strategies and provide an empirical basis for formulating action plans and developing more adaptive, innovative, and sustainable library services.
Co-Authors I Wayan Wijanaraga