Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM FIKRI : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya
Peri Pirmansyah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Politik Hukum Amandemen UUD 1945 Dan Sistem Pemerintahan Peri Pirmansyah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 14 No. 1 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Normatively the amendment of Indonesian Constitution 1945 implemented pure presidential system. However, the sytewm is not compatible with the multy parties system which is viasible based on the amendment. Thus, to maintain the presidential system, it needs further regulations in the form of Act  concerns to more simple  party system to support presidential system.
Legal Choice and Inheritance Negotiation in a Plural Legal Order: Typologies and Determinants in Padang Sidempuan, Indonesia Mahmud Dongoran; Syamruddin Nasution; Peri Pirmansyah
Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jf.v11i1.7476

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of legal choice in inheritance distribution within Indonesia’s plural legal system, where Islamic inheritance law (farā’iḍ) and customary law coexist but often operate in tension. Focusing on Padang Sidempuan, a predominantly Muslim society characterized by a strong Batak Angkola patrilineal structure, this research aims to analyze how inheritance decisions are determined and negotiated in practice. Using a qualitative socio-legal approach, the study examines six inheritance cases (2023–2024) through in-depth interviews with 18 informants, analysis of Religious Court decisions, and relevant documentary evidence. The data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns of legal choice and dispute resolution. The findings reveal three distinct typologies of inheritance settlement: first, full application of Islamic inheritance law, second, dominance of customary law, and third, a negotiated hybrid model combining elements of both systems. The study further demonstrates that legal choice is shaped by the interaction of six key factors: religious literacy, patrilineal kinship structure, social authority, institutional access, economic value of assets, and gender awareness. Rather than reflecting rigid normative conflict, inheritance practices operate through dynamic processes of social negotiation that produce context-specific outcomes. Theoretically, this study contributes to the discourse on legal pluralism by conceptualizing inheritance decisions as negotiated and adaptive processes. Empirically, it provides a structured model for understanding legal choice in inheritance practices within patrilineal Muslim societies.
Co-Authors Mahmud Dongoran Syamruddin Nasution