Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.554
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Justitia et Pax Jurnal Meta-Yuridis INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW (IJOSPL) JHCLS SENAPAS Domus Legalis Cogitatio
Elisabeth Sundari
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FULFILLMENT OF MEDICAL EXPENSES FOR VICTIMS OF KLITIH CRIME YOGYAKARTA Arabella, Cecilia; Hidayat, Rizkiana; Tandori, Tandori; Sundari, Elisabeth
Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Vol 8, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : fakultas hukum universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/m-y.v8i1.21442

Abstract

The research aims to examine the state's responsibility in fulfilling health costs for victims of street crime in D.I Yogyakarta based on the 1945 Constitution and Presidential Regulation No. 82/2018 excluding the provision of health insurance for victims of klitih crime violence. The research method used is normative juridical with the framework of Pancasila welfare state theory, which focuses on analyzing legal norms and public policies. This research confirms the discrimination between existing policies and the principle of state responsibility in fulfilling health rights for victims. Current policies have not fully met constitutional standards in providing health protection to victims of violent crimes, which has the potential to hinder their rehabilitation process. Most victims face challenges in accessing health services due to lack of coverage. Therefore, comprehensive policy reforms are needed to strengthen social protection, by optimizing inter-agency cooperation, and ensuring fair and equitable accessibility of health services for all victims of criminal acts.
Should Indonesia Adopt Legal Representation in Civil Cases? Sundari, Elisabeth; Halim, Helidorus Chandera; Ousu Mendy
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.604

Abstract

Despite the recognised benefits of legal counsel and its increasing use in practice, the Indonesian legal framework does not sufficiently encourage legal representation in civil proceedings. This research examines the validity of Indonesia adopting and adapting mandatory legal representation. It encompasses a normative legal approach by examining and analysing qualitatively the Indonesian self-representation legal system and its secondary data of practices, the Netherland’s legal-representation framework comparatively, the theory of access to justice, as well as Posner’s law and economic analysis. This study shows that theoretically and practically, it is viable for Indonesia to adopt mandatory legal representation model in civil proceedings by establishing a compulsory legal framework to make it works effectively and promotes greater access to justice. However, based on a comparison to the Netherland’s framework, Indonesia needs to adapt it to the Indonesian context to overcome attorney fees challenge. First, by requiring legal representation only for complex civil cases. Second, by regulating legal fee agreements based on reasonableness, fairness, and transparency, and imposing strict legal sanctions on lawyers who refuse to provide pro bono legal assistance to litigants who cannot afford attorney fees. Third, strengthen the legal aid system by establishing a Legal Aids Board and providing adequate and sustainable funding. This research demonstrates that legal representation provides greater access to justice compared to self-litigation, in terms of ensuring fair, reasoned, and expedited judicial proceedings. In contrast, self-litigation primarily facilitates access to more affordable justice, as it eliminates the need to pay attorney fees.
AUTHORITY OF BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN RESOLVING DEFAULT DISPUTES IN CONSUMER FINANCING Andreyan, Giovanni Oryssa Sativa; Sundari, Elisabeth
Domus Legalis Cogitatio Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Domus Legalis Cogitatio Vol 1 No 2 October 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law Atma Jaya Yogyakarta University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/dlc.v1i2.7858

Abstract

This research aims to explore and study the cause of different perspective between Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) and Supreme Court, regarding the authority of BPSK in Resolving Wanprestasi Disputes in Consumer Financing, as well as to examine the boundaries of BPSK in resolving Wanprestasi disputes in consumer financing in order to achieve the legal certainty. This research is a normative research which use constitutive approach and conseptual approach. The data collection method is using literature review and interview. The primary legal materials and secondary legal materials are analyzed by descriptive qualitative to answer the legal matters which being studied. The logic of deductive is used to draw conclusion. The result of this research is there are some factors which causes different perspective betweeen BPSK and Hakim Agung; BPSK still believes that the Wanprestasi dispute in consumer financing is their authority, the blurry criteria of disputes which are the authority of BPSK and the absence of limitative boundaries to BPSK authority towards Consumers Protection Law. The limitations of BPSK’s authority is they need to clarified the definition of consumer’s disputes as wanprestasi disputes is included in BPSK’s authority. The disputes handled by BPSK should have minor loss, and if a place of dispute resolution in BPSK’s court already in the agreement of consumer financing, BPSK must reject it.
PENILAIAN HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI SLEMAN TERHADAP ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM SENGKETA PERDATA Sundari, Elisabeth; Dora Tamasia, Tessa Febriane Paat, Grace Br Tamba, Aprilia Nur Fatikha, Artha Dita Dwi Aryani Saragi
Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Abdimas Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/senapas.v2i1.9315

Abstract

Pembuktian bertujuan untuk memperkuat kebenaran dalil tentang fakta hukum yang menjadi pokok sengketa, sehingga hakim memperoleh dasar kepastian untuk menjatuhkan keputusan. Sejak berlakunya UU ITE terdapat perdebatan kedudukan alat bukti elektronik. Namun ditegaskan dalam Pasal 5 Ayat (1) UU ITE, kedudukan bukti elektronik berdiri sendiri sebagai perluasan dari alat bukti yang ada dan dianggap sebagai sah. Majelis melihat bukti elektronik yang satu dengan yang lainnya saling mendukung dan memiliki keterkaitan. Dengan demikian majelis berpendapat bukti-bukti surat yang merupakan fotokopi dari fotokopi tersebut karena didukung oleh alat bukti surat lainnya serta keterangan saksi-saksi sehingga dapat digunakan sebagai alat bukti yang sah.
Co-Authors Andreyan, Giovanni Oryssa Sativa Anna Marieta Simangunsong Anny Retnowati Arabella, Cecilia Dora Tamasia, Tessa Febriane Paat, Grace Br Tamba, Aprilia Nur Fatikha, Artha Dita Dwi Aryani Saragih Giovanni Oryssa Sativa Andreyan Halim, Helidorus Chandera Hidayat, Rizkiana Isabelle Valerie Matheus Nurlatu Nurlatu, Matheus Ousu Mendy Simangunsong, Anna Marieta Tandori, Tandori Valerie, Isabelle Widiastiani, Nindry Sulistya