Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Larangan Penggunaan Klausul Baku Tertentu dalam Perjanjian antara Konsumen dan Pelaku Usaha Ahmadi Miru
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Consumer Protection Act (UUPK), that initially became the hope for consumers and frightened business actors (producers) due to its threat ofsanctions, after two years having been declared to bein effect, did not show any significant indication that the Act alreadyprovided protections to consumers. Despite the fact that the ineffectiveness ofacts Is generally due to three factors, namely, implementing agents ofthe act (structure), the substance ofthe act (substance), and society subject to the act(culture), tha merely questioning ofthe substance ofthis act, especially Article 18Paragraph (1) that prohibits theattachment ofthestandard clauses, was because the article contains many defect making the actcould not ordifficult to be obeyed, unless perfection is made to it.Therefore, to be effective, perfection should bemade to Article 18 Paragraph (1) ofthe UUPK as well as orther articles containing defects. Similarly, prohibition ofattachment shouldnotbe applied merely onthestandardclausesbutalsothenon-standard clauses that infict any loss upon consumers as regulated by Article 18 Paragraph (1) ofUUPK.Beside theperfection oftheact (UUPK) in order that consumers should notbesuffered losses causedbyproducers, what should be performed would be consumer's educa tion, theunity ofconsumers, andthe implementation ofa good faith.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM NOTARIS TERKAIT PEMALSUAN IDENTITAS DEBITOR DALAM AKAD MURABAHAH DI BSI MAKASSAR Suharti Febriana; Ahmadi Miru; Muhammad Azwan
El-Iqthisadi Volume 4 Nomor 2 Desember 2022
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/el-iqthisady.vi.29840

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to examine and analyze the form of responsibility for the notarys deed made related to the falsification of the debtors identity in the Akad Murabahah; and analyzing forms of legal protection for notaries regarding falsification of debtor identityes in Akad Murabahah. This research is a normative research using a statutory approach and a cese approach. The results show that legal protection for notaries for false information or identities has not been regulated in the UUJN, legal protection from the notaris honorary council MKN only approves or refuses when a notary summoned by investcth. The notarys responsibility regarding false identity or false information in making an authentic deed in akad murabahahcannot beaccounted for by a notary as long as the notary does’t violate UUJN, does’t violate the technique of making the deed, or the applicable laws. Keywords: Akad Murabahah, False identity, Notary.
AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI OLEH AHLI WARIS KARENA WANPRESTASI Nur Afni Ahmad; Ahmadi Miru; Ratnawati
El-Iqthisadi Volume 5 Nomor 1 Juni 2023
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/el-iqthisady.vi.39440

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan ahli waris dalam membatalkan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli yang dimana pembatalan tersebut menimbulkan akibat hukum, dan alasan (ratio decidendi) pertimbangan hakim sampai pada putusannya membatalkan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif yang berfokus pada kajian tertulis seperti peraturan perundang-undangan, keputusan pengadilan, teori hukum, asas-asas hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum dan dapat berupa hasil karya ilmiah oleh para sarjana hukum, sehingga penelitian ini sangat berkaitan dengan studi kepustakaan (library research). Pendekatan dalam penelitian ini adalah menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan wanprestasi tergugat yang tidak beritikad baik untuk melunasi sisa pembayaran harga tanah sampai jangka waktu yang telah dijanjikan sehingga penggugat meminta pembatalan perjanjian yang dimana menimbulkan akibat hukum yaitu memulihkan keadaan seperti semula sebelum terjadinya perjanjian. Pihak yang meminta pembatalan perjanjian wajib mengembalikan prestasi yang telah dibayarkan oleh pembeli dan pihak yang wanprestasi dikenakan denda ganti rugi yang besarnya telah disepakati dari jumlah yang harus dibayarkan pembeli kepada penjual untuk tiap-tiap hari keterlambatannya. Alasan hakim sampai pada putusannya membatalkan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli ialah tergugat melakukan tindakan wanprestasi yang dimana tidak melunasi sisa pembayaran harga tanah sampai jangka waktu yang telah diperjanjikan, serta tidak mempunyai itikad baik untuk menyelesaikan perjanjian. Kata Kunci: Ahli waris , Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli, Wanprestasi. Abstract This study aims to analyze the position of the heirs in canceling the sale and purchase binding agreement in which the cancellation has legal consequences, and the reasons (ratio decidendi) of Bakim's consideration until his decision to cancel the sale and purchase binding agreement. written studies such as legislation, court decisions, legal theory, legal principles, legal principles and can be in the form of scientific work by law scholars so that this research is closely related to library research. The approach in this research is using a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of the study show that the defendant's default action was not intended to pay off the remaining land price payment until the promised period, so that the plaintiff requested the cancellation of the agreement. Where it has legal consequences, namely restoring the situation to what it was before the agreement was made. The party requesting the cancellation of the agreement is obliged to return the performance that has been paid by the buyer and the party who defaults is subject to a compensation fine of the agreed amount of the amount that the buyer must pay to the seller for each day of delay. The reason the judge came to his decision to cancel the sale and purchase binding agreement was that the defendant committed an act of default which did not pay off the remaining payment of the land price until the agreed period, and did not have good faith to complete the agreement. Keywords: Heirs, Binding sale and Purchase agreement, Default.
IMPOSITION OF MORTGAGE RIGHTS BY THE GRANTOR OF THE GRANT BINDING AGREEMENT OBJECT KARNILLA; AHMADI MIRU; WINNER SITORUS
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (79.476 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v3i2.252

Abstract

This paper analyzes the object of the grant binding agreement made in the presence of a notary public who can be liable to a third party by the granter This study uses a normative juridical approach, namely legal writing done by examining data or library materials which are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. After the legal materials are collected, they are processed and analyzed using qualitative methods. The research results show that basically, the agreements that have been made based on the provisions of Article 1320 Burgerlijk Wetboek have binding legal force, meaning that the agreements that have been approved and set forth in the form of a binding agreement are laws for those who make them. Therefore, the grant binding agreement made before a notary public even though there has been no transfer of title to land, the object of the grant binding agreement cannot be borne by the grantee to a third party, given the initial purpose of making the agreement deed of the grant agreement is so that real grants can be made.
AUTHORITY TO ACT HUSBAND OR WIFE IN MAKING A DEED OF TESTAMENTARY ESTATE (LEGAAT) ON JOINT PROPERTY IN MARRIAGE Jassica Halim; Ahmadi Miru; Nurfaidah Said
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (377.463 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i1.534

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the actions of the husband or wife in making a deed of the testamentary estate of joint property in marriage. This type of research is normative-legal research, using a legal approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, using library research techniques, qualitatively analyzed using prescriptive presentation techniques. The results showed that the husband or wife's authority to act in making a deed of the testamentary estate (legaat) on joint property in a marriage, namely a capable husband or wife and a lamp to act alone without requiring the approval of the wife or husband, as long as what was granted in the will only and part-owned by husband or wife over the object of joint property in marriage, because if the deed of grant of will on joint property in a marriage is made jointly by husband and wife or made by husband or wife with the consent of the wife or husband, then on the deed of grant of will it will be in danger of being canceled.