Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Widya Yuridika

Analisis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan ASN Menggunakan Teori Fungsionalisme Struktural Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap
Widya Yuridika Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v4i1.2235

Abstract

Legal issues, including the criminal acts of corruption which are still widely committed by the State Civil Service (ASN) at this time are no longer a matter of formal legality, regarding the proper interpretation and application of articles of statutory regulations, but rather move to the direction of using the law as a means to participate in shaping a new life order or in accordance with current conditions. Law and society are closely related. Therefore, it is necessary to use social science or legal sociology to analyze and study legal issues, one of which is the structural functionalism theory to study law enforcement in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to determine the analysis of corruption cases conducted by ASN in Indonesia using structural functionalism theory. In this study is a normative juridical research. The approach taken in this paper is a conceptual approach. This research is a library research. The result of this research is that the criminal act of corruption committed by ASN can be studied using structural functionalism theory as a science of legal sociology. According to the structural functionalism theory, if one of the elements in the structure does not function, the law will not work or be unstable. ASN is an element or implementing structure (government). Judging from the structural functionalism theory, acts of corruption by ASN make the law not function properly. Besides that, there is also a system and emphasis in studying structural functionalism, there is an AGIL paradigm in the structural theory of functionalism. It can be seen that the act of corruption by ASN has made ASN unable to perform its function properly in providing public services or is dysfunctional, and the law becomes unstable.AbstrakPersoalan-persoalan tentang hukum, tidak terkecuali tindak pidana korupsi yang masih banyak dilakukan oleh Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) pada saat ini tidak lagi merupakan persoalan tentang legilitas formal, tentang penafsiran serta penerapan pasal-pasal peraturan perundang-undangan secara semestinya, melainkan bergerak ke arah penggunaan hukum sebagai sarana untuk turut membentuk tata kehidupan yang baru atau sesuai dengan kondisi saat itu. Hukum dan masyarakat memiliki keterkaitan erat. Oleh karena itu dibutuhkan pemanfaatan ilmu sosial atau sosiologi hukum untuk menganalisis dan mengkaji persoalan-persoalan hukum, salah satunya pada teori funsionalisme struktural untuk mengkaji penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk menegtahui analisis kasus korupsi yang dilakukan ASN di Indonesia menggunakan teori fungsionalisme struktural. Dalam penelitian ini merupakan penelitan yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang dilakukan dalam tulisan ini adalah pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (Library Research).  Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh ASN dapat dikaji menggunakan  teori fungsionalisme struktural sebagai ilmu sosiologi hukum. Menurut teori fungsionalisme struktural jika salah satu elemen dalam struktur tersebut tidak berfungsi maka hukum tidak akan berjalan atau tidak stabil. ASN merupakan elemen atau struktur  pelaksana (pemerintah). Dikaji dari teori fungsionalisme struktural tindakan korupsi yang dilakukan ASN menjadikan hukum tidak berfungsi dengan baik. Selain itu juga terdapat sistem dan penekanan dalam mempelajari fungsionalisme struktural, terdapat paradigma AGIL dalam teori struktural fungsionalisme ini. Dapat terlihat bahwa tindakan korupsi yang dilakukan ASN tersebut menjadikan ASN tidak dapat melakukan fungsinya dengan baik dalam melakukan pelayanan publik atau terdapat disfungsional, serta hukum menjadi berjalan tidak stabil. 
Analisis Hubungan Dinas Publik Antara Pegawai Pemerintah Dengan Perjanjian Kerja Dan Pemerintah Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap
Widya Yuridika Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v4i2.2668

Abstract

In Article 1 point 4 of Law no. 5 of 2014 states that, "Government Employees with Work Agreements, hereinafter abbreviated as PPPK, are Indonesian citizens who meet certain requirements, who are appointed based on work agreements for a certain period of time in order to carry out government duties." One of the characteristics of civil servants who work in government agencies is to have a relationship between civil servants and the government. This relationship is known as opebare dienstbetrekking or Public Service Relations. A voluntary agreement or a special contract due to the appointment that gives rise to the HDP is a one-sided legal act (aanstelling) from the Government. This one-sided government action was marked by the issuance of a Decree of appointment given to Civil Servants. Meanwhile, PPPK is appointed based on a work agreement. Appointments with this work agreement will be understood by their appointments based on ordinary contracts or two-sided government actions. The purpose of this study is to find out the appointment of PPPK is normatively reviewed and analyzes related to PPPK which can be classified or not as Civil Servants who have the characteristics of Public Service Relations with the Government due to the appointment of PPPK based on a work agreement. This type of research is a normative juridical research based on primary and secondary legal materials. The study was carried out using a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. This research is a library research.
Legalitas Pengaturan Kepesertaan BPJS Kesehatan Sebagai Syarat Pelayanan Publik Moh. Hasyim; Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4174

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze how the legality of BPJS Health membership arrangements is a condition of public service. The research method used covers, first, this type of research is normative juridical research which is based on primary and secondary legal materials. Second, the review is carried out using a conceptual approach (conceptual approach) and statutory approach (statute approach). Third, this research is a library research. The results of this study state that administrative sanctions in the form of not providing public services because they are not registered as BPJS participants have fulfilled the legality principle, because they have been regulated in Article 17 of the BPJS Law which is then regulated further in PP 86 Number 2013, while Presidential Instruction 1 of 2022 is a guideline that apply internally to implement the two regulations. However, in accordance with the principle of legality, based on the attribution of authority granted by Article 17 paragraph (5) of the BPJS Law, PP 86 Number 2013 only regulates the procedure for imposing administrative sanctions, does not regulate the determination of membership in the JKN program as a requirement for obtaining public services as well as mentioning the types of The types of public services referred to, and both of these things should be regulated in law.
Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Bantu Intan Fradila Pancawati; Amanda Rizkina Wirawati; Andre Bagus Saputra; Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i2.4453

Abstract

The need for employees in government agencies is problematic due to the lack of recruitment formations for Civil Servants and Government Employees with Work Agreements (PPPK) causes the appointment of auxiliary employee through governor regulations in Yogyakarta Special Region to fill formations or positions in government administration. However, the existence of auxiliary staff employees is not clearly regulated in the employment law. Furthermore, it is needed to find the status, position and legal protection of Auxiliary Personel staff. This study aims to analyze, provide clarity and solutions regarding the status of the position and legal protection, based on Government Regulation No. 49 of 2018 concerning Management of Government Employees with Work Agreements in Yogyakarta Special Region. The method used in this research is empirical juridical by conducting interviews and statute approach. The conclusion of this study is that the Governor's Regulation on the Management of Auxiliary Personnel is invalid and null and void which resulted in unclear status and position of auxiliary staff within the Yogyakarta Special Region Government. Moreover, the legal protection for auxiliary personnel is not yet maximized and Auxiliary personnel should be given the same protection as PPPK for the same workload and work responsibilities.Kebutuhan akan pegawai di instansi pemerintah mengalami problematika dikarenakan kurangnya formasi recrutmen Pegawai Negeri Sipil dan Pegawai Pemerintah dengan Perjanjian Kerja (PPPK), hal ini menyebabkan Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta melalui peraturan gubernur melakukan pengangkatan tenaga bantu guna mengisi formasi atau jabatan dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Meskipun demikian sampai saat ini pegawai tenaga bantu keberadaannya tidak diatur secara jelas dalam aturan hukum kepegawaian, sehingga diperlukan untuk menegaskan status dan kedudukan serta perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga bantu itu sendiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan memberi kejelasan mengenai status kedudukan dan perlindungan hukum, berdasar Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 49 tahun 2018 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Pemerintah dengan Perjanjian Kerja serta memberikan solusi bagi permasalahan tenaga bantu Pemerintah Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu yuridis empiris dengan melakukan wawancara dan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yaitu Peraturan Gubernur tentang Pengelolaan Tenaga Bantu adalah tidak sah dan batal demi hukum yang mengakibatkan tidak jelasnya status dan kedudukan tenaga bantu dilingkungan Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, dan perlindungan hukum kepada tenaga bantu belumlah maksimal karena masih terdapat ketidakpastian hukum bagi tenaga bantu yang mana seharusnya tenaga bantu memiliki perlindungan yang sama dengan PPPK karena memiliki beban kerja dan tanggungjawab kerja yang sama.