Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.151
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudence Widya Yuridika Jurnal Ius Constituendum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Lastuti Abubakar
Universitas Padjajaran
Religion Arts Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
KESIAPAN INFRASTRUKTUR HUKUM DALAM PENERBITAN SUKUK (SURAT BERHARGA SYARIAH) SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PEMBIAYAAN DAN INVESTASI UNTUK MENDORONG PERTUMBUHAN PASAR MODAL SYARIAH INDONESIA Lastuti Abubakar; Tri Handayani
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Vol. 7, No. 1, Juni 2017
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v7i1.4348

Abstract

Pasar Modal Syariah merupakan bagian dari pasar modal Indonesia yang mempunyai peran penting sebagai alternatif pembiayaan bagi dunia usaha dan pemerintah, serta sarana bagi pemilik modal untuk memperoleh return melalui instrumen-intrumen investasi yang ditawarkan di pasar modal. Salah satu instrumen pasar modal syariah yang mempunyai potensi besar dalam menyerap dana masyarakat pasca krisis  adalah Sukuk (surat berharga syariah). Indonesia dianggap memiliki potensi besar untuk menjadi pasar sukuk, mengingat populasi muslim yang besar serta besarnya pinjaman lintas negara. Namun demikian, pertumbuhan sukuk sebagai alternative pembiayaan dan investasi belum berkontribusi secara signifikan dalam mendorong pertumbuhan pasar modal syariah serta pembangunan ekonomi nasional secara umum. Salah satu isu strategis dalam pengembangan sukuk Indonesia adalah kesiapan infratruktur hukum yang belum optimal, sehingga dalam praktik masih menimbulkan mispersepsi terhadap sukuk yang seringkali dipadankan dengan obligasi, mengakibatkan sukuk belum dianggap sebagai instrumen alternatif yang menarik baik bagi dunia usaha maupun investasi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh hasil bahwa regulasi sukuk di Indonesia masih bersifat parsial dan tersebar dalam berbagai aturan, sehingga mengakibatkan rendahnya pemahaman pelaku usaha dan investor terhadap kerangka hukum sukuk, serta jaminan kepastian hukum bagi pemegang sukuk. Regulasi sukuk yang terintegrasi merupakan syarat utama untuk memberikan jaminan dan kepastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha dan investor.  Indonesia, khususnya regulator perlu mengupayakan keberagaman jenis sukuk baik akad maupun underlying assets nya agar investor dapat memilih jenis-jenis sukuk yang sesuai dengan harapan. Selain itu, diperlukan kebijakan yang bersifat top down dari pemerintah untuk mendorong pertumbuhan sukuk negara dengan membuat kebijakan bagi BUMN untuk berinvestasi pada sukuk.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Pemegang Obligasi Atas Gagal Bayar Yang Dilakukan Oleh Emiten Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Humaira Nadhifa; Lastuti Abubakar; Tri Handayani
Widya Yuridika Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v5i1.3081

Abstract

The development of the Indonesian Capital Market is currently running very rapidly. The rapid development Indonesian Capital Market can’t be separated from the role of Investors and Issuers as the main actors in the capital market. Bond as one of the investment instrument in Indonesian Capital Market which currently circulating in line with high demand among investor considering bond have lower risk than other capital market instruments. However, investing in bond is not without risk, because Issuer may fail to pay their obligation. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic has caused bond default rates to increase. Such condition can lead to a crisis of Investors confidence in Indonesian Capital Market. Therefore, this study aims to find out and understand the form of legal protection for Investors who suffer losses due to default during Covid-19 Pandemic and the legal actions that can be taken by Investors for losses arising from default. The research method used is normative juridical with descriptive analytical research specification. Based on the Indonesian Civil Code and Indonesian Capital Market Law, it can be concluded that the Issuer who issue bond is responsible for paying bond interest and returning the principal of the bond loan on the maturity date to Investors. Bond default give Investors the right to demand the return of their rights to bond interest and to the principal of maturing bond through the Trustee. Legal actions that can be taken by bondholders are internal dispute settlement, external dispute settlement through Integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution, or through litigation.
Impact of Personal Data Protection (PDP) Law and Enforcement Authority Body for PDP Failure in Banking Industry Ignatius Widhianto; Lastuti Abubakar; Tri Handayani
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i3.5287

Abstract

Personal Data Protection law (PDP) as enacted on 17th October 2022 is create new dimension in Indonesia legal system. PDP law not only “cherry on top” of the previous regulation, but also to perfection the law that focus on protection of the personal or individual rights, especially if that person is bank customer. Financial services is one of the most highly regulatory industry, banking industry as the part of financial services industry have holy grail obligation to protect as we called bank secrecy. PDP law is to complement bank secrecy regulation, since PDP provide specific and strict regulation regarding personal data processing activities in banking. Until February 2026, PDP law not have an implementation regulation and specific regulator as mentioned before at law, this condition can raise the challenge for the banking industry to comply. Banking industry is an industry that process personal data in large number, this industry shall to response the situation carefully, since Bank DNA must compliance with the prevailing law and regulations, unfortunately the regulation not yet enough regulate personal data protection in detail. Moreover, PDP law mandates the creation of a special intuitions related to the regulator and enforcement of PDP Law infringement. The creation of this institution can raise dualism for banking industry, considering that banking is already regulated and supervised by the Financial Services Authority (OJK).
MITIGATING CREDIT RISK IN BANKING: DETERMINING LIMIT VALUES FOR AUCTIONING MORTGAGE RIGHTS COLLATERAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH AUCTION REGULATIONS Lastuti Abubakar; Tri Handayani
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 27, No 1: April 2025: Customary Law and development in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Auction Implementation of Guidelines Regulation confirmed that the execution auction of collateral objects related to Mortgage Rights is a method designed to protect the rights of all parties involved. One of the key principles is the requirement to establish a limit value for mandatory auctions, including those related to Mortgage Rights. However, the current practices of execution auctions do not align with regulatory expectations that seek to ensure optimal pricing and a fair and legally certain process. Debtor objections to the determination of Limit Value and low selling prices have led to legal disputes against creditors. Therefore, an examination is essential to understand how risk mitigation can be achieved through the establishment of limit value. This study adopts a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical research specification. The findings reveal that Articles 55-60 of Auction Implementation Guidelines Regulation outline the obligation to establish a limit value and provide criteria for determining that value. The establishment of limit value can function as a risk mitigation tool for Bank creditors, allowing them to adhere to prudential principles while providing legal certainty and protection for debtors, ultimately facilitating the attainment of the best possible price for their collateral objects.
Penyelesaian Kerugian Investor Dari Praktik Insider Trading di Pasar Modal di Indonesia Reyhan Rivelino; Lastuti Abubakar; Sudaryat Sudaryat
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i3.7475

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine trading crimes insider are crimes that occur a lot in the Capital Market and are very difficult to prove in the process of handling and solving them so that in this case investors always get the biggest loss point. Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets as amended by Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Strengthening and Development of the Financial Sector explains the limitations and legal protection of investors related to Insider Trading practices, but this is considered insufficient to be able to protect investors optimally. This research is written using qualitative juridical writing techniques, namely describing data with theories to answer questions accompanied by legal interpretations so that conclusions can be drawn. The purpose of this study is to discuss how OJK as a supervisory institution in the capital market to handle and resolve Insider Trading practices and how repressive steps are taken after Insider Trading crimes occur so that the protection that investors should get will be realized. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengkaji kejahatan perdagangan orang dalam (insider trading) merupakan kejahatan yang banyak terjadi di Pasar Modal dan sangat sulit dibuktikan dalam proses penanganannya dan penyelesaiannya sehingga dalam hal ini investor lah yang selalu mendapatkan titik kerugian terbesar. UU Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal sebagaimana diubah dengan UU Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Penguatan dan Pengembangan Sektor Keuangan menjelaskan terkait batasan-batasan dan perlindungan hukum investor terkait praktik insider trading, namun hal ini dirasa belum cukup untuk dapat melindungi investor secara optimal. Penelitian ini ditulis dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis kualitatif yaitu mendeskripsikan data dengan teori-teori untuk menjawab pertanyaan disertai dengan penafsiran hukum sehingga dapat ditarik kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian terhadap penyelesaian dan tindakan yang dilakukan OJK dalam insider trading merupakan hal yang penting untuk dilakukan OJK dan terkait dengan tindakannya dilakukan dengan cara melakukan pemeriksaan penyidikan pembuktian hingga penjatuhan sanksi, terkait dengan bentuk perlindungannya bisa dilakukan dengan langkah represif berupa penjatuhan sanksi setelah terjadinya suatu kejahatan dan pelanggaran di pasar modal.     
Strengthening Regulations towards Implementation of Intellectual Property-Based Financing Scheme with YouTube Content as Collateral Ishtar Amarindra Pasha; Lastuti Abubakar; Helitha Novianty Muchtar
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): OCTOBER
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v9i3.9142

Abstract

This research aims at examining how the regulator can make regulation to optimize financing implementation with YouTube content as a collateral. This research is considered necessary, because besides Government Regulation Number 24 Year 2022 which becomes the basis to give financing under an intellectual property as a collateral, banking institutions might still be in doubt to implement such a financing scheme due to many weak supporting regulations. This research is conducted with a normative-juridical approach method. The research shows that there are still many regulations which have not accommodated the financing implementation of intellectual property-based financing scheme basis, especially those regulations related to valuation, recognition of intellectual property as a banking asset and execution of intellectual property when a debtor default. The weak regulation of these three aspects makes financial institutions doubtful to implement the intellectual property-based financing especially because bank activities are to collect and distribute funds to the society. The conclusions of this research show that basically there has been a method or way to anticipate the three problems, but it needs to be legalized in a form of regulation so that the bank has legal certainty and protection in its financing with intellectual property as the collateral. The regulators are supposed to be able to create regulation to optimize financing implementation with intellectual property as the collateral.
Co-Authors Helitha Novianty Muchtar Humaira Nadhifa Ignatius Widhianto Ishtar Amarindra Pasha Reyhan Rivelino Sudaryat Tri Handayani Tri Handayani