The violent conflict that occurred between demonstrators and police personnel during the demonstration is an issue that can disrupt public order and give rise to legal issues for the parties. The resolution of this conflict is not only oriented towards repressive law enforcement, but also requires an approach that can restore relationships, resolve losses, and prevent recurrence of conflict. This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in resolving violent conflicts between demonstrators and police personnel at the Kendari Police Headquarters and identify the obstacles faced in its implementation. This study uses an empirical legal research method with a qualitative descriptive approach. Research data were obtained through interviews, observations, and documentation related to the conflict resolution process between demonstrators and police personnel. The results of the study indicate that the application of restorative justice can be an alternative resolution of violent conflicts through a process of dialogue and deliberation involving the conflicting parties, prioritizing recovery, accountability, and the creation of mutual agreements. The application of this approach can also help reduce conflict escalation and provide space for the parties to resolve the problem more constructively. However, its implementation still faces several obstacles, including differing interests and perceptions between demonstrators and the police, the parties' willingness to reconcile, the complexity of violent incidents, and limited understanding of restorative justice mechanisms. Therefore, improved communication, transparency, and professionalism of police personnel are needed, as well as coordination with relevant parties to ensure the effective implementation of restorative justice in resolving conflicts between demonstrators and police personnel while ensuring legal certainty and justice.