Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Analisis terhadap Upaya Hukum Perlawanan terhadap Putusan dalam Perkara Perdata Linda Mayasari; Muh. Fitriadi; Marlin
Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 6 No 1: April (2026)
Publisher : Arden Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57250/ajsh.v6i1.2431

Abstract

Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode analysis deskriptif kualitatif di mana yang dianalisiskan adalah mengenai perlakuan tergugat dalam perkara perdata yang secara sengaja tidak menghadiri siding meskipun telah dipanggil secara sah dan patut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, bahwa ketidakhadiran tergugat tersebut bukan karena tidak mengetahui dirinya di gugat, juga bukan karena alasan yang sah.Relas panggilan sidang pun ditunjukkan oleh juru sita namun tergugat menolak bertanda tangan, setelah perkara diputus verstek tergugat mengajukan upaya hukum perlawanan. Ternyata di balik penolakan dlaam menanda tangani relas panggilan tersebut terselubung tujuan licik yaitu dengan maksud lebih lama menguasai tanah objek sengeketa dan untuk menguras penggugat dari segi waktu dan pembiayaan yang kebetulan penggugat berdomisili di kota kendari. Tindakan tergugat terbut asas mendengar asas mendengar kedua belah pihak karena memang secara sengaja merugikan penggugat. Seharusnya keadaan seperti ini tergugat mengajukan upaya hukum perlawanan.
Legal Certainty of Mineral Mining Permits as State Administrative Decisions: Between Regulation and Implementation Sabri Guntur; Marlin; Syaiful Arpin
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): on Progress
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i4.5731

Abstract

One of the main challenges in Indonesia, particularly regarding the administration of mineral mining permits, is ensuring legal certainty—that is, having appropriate regulations and proper implementation. Because they constitute administrative decisions, mining permits often trigger disputes related to overlapping administrative authorities, procedural irregularities, and uneven policy enforcement. This study aims to examine the reflection of legal certainty in the regulation and administration of mineral mining permits, as well as to analyze the legal consequences arising from administrative inconsistencies in permitting practices. This study employs a normative legal methodology using legislative, conceptual, and case-based approaches. Legal materials are drawn from laws, court decisions, legal doctrines, and relevant academic articles on mining law and administrative law. The research findings indicate that although the laws and regulatory framework governing the issuance of mineral mining permits have established a formal design for certainty in administration, their implementation is consistently hindered by overlapping regulatory provisions, weak institutional coordination, and discretionary practices by government authorities. This creates uncertainty for investors, local communities, and the administration of state governance. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that mining permits, as Administrative Decisions, must be grounded in the principles of legality, transparency, accountability, and good governance to ensure legal protection and administrative justice. This study identified several key findings regarding the regulatory background of mineral resource management, related documents, and the involvement of third parties (stakeholders) in the permitting process. Theoretically, this study contributes to strengthening the discourse on the relationship between mining law and administrative law, with a critical focus on the importance of harmonizing regulatory policies and administrative implementation to provide legal certainty for the mineral mining sector in Indonesia.
THE ROLE OF THE SOUTH KONAWE POLICE DRUG RESEARCH UNIT IN COMBATING NARCOTICS ABUSE (A STUDY OF THE SOUTH KONAWE POLICE DRUG RESEARCH UNIT). Fatma Wati; Yedi Kusnadi; Nurlela Puspa Sari; Fatahillah; Marlin
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): December - ON PROGRESS
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Drug abuse is a legal and social problem that can have serious impacts on security, health, and public order. This condition demands an active role from law enforcement officers, particularly the Narcotics Investigation Unit, in efforts to combat drug abuse. This study aims to analyze the role of the South Konawe Police Narcotics Investigation Unit in combating drug abuse and identify obstacles faced in carrying out this task. This study uses an empirical legal research method with a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were obtained through interviews, observations, and documentation related to the implementation of the South Konawe Police Narcotics Investigation Unit's duties. The results show that the South Konawe Police Narcotics Investigation Unit plays a crucial role in combating drug abuse through preemptive, preventive, and repressive efforts. Preemptive efforts are carried out through providing education and outreach to the community regarding the dangers of narcotics, while preventive efforts are carried out through monitoring areas considered vulnerable, patrol activities, and cooperation with various parties. Meanwhile, repressive efforts are carried out through investigations, inquiries, arrests, searches, confiscation of evidence, and legal proceedings against perpetrators of narcotics crimes. In its implementation, several obstacles remain, including limited human resources, facilities and infrastructure, the vastness of the jurisdiction, and the still low awareness of some members of the public to participate in eradicating narcotics abuse. Therefore, it is necessary to increase personnel capacity, support facilities and infrastructure, and strengthen synergy between the police, local governments, related institutions, and the community so that the eradication of narcotics abuse in the jurisdiction of the South Konawe Police can be implemented more optimally.
IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN RESOLUTION OF VIOLENT CONFLICT BETWEEN DEMONSTRATORS AND POLICE PERSONNEL AT KENDARI POLICE REGENCY. Maulana Saputra Sauala; Arif Try Dhana Jaya; Asrullah; Nurlela Puspa Sari; Marlin
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): December - ON PROGRESS
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The violent conflict that occurred between demonstrators and police personnel during the demonstration is an issue that can disrupt public order and give rise to legal issues for the parties. The resolution of this conflict is not only oriented towards repressive law enforcement, but also requires an approach that can restore relationships, resolve losses, and prevent recurrence of conflict. This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in resolving violent conflicts between demonstrators and police personnel at the Kendari Police Headquarters and identify the obstacles faced in its implementation. This study uses an empirical legal research method with a qualitative descriptive approach. Research data were obtained through interviews, observations, and documentation related to the conflict resolution process between demonstrators and police personnel. The results of the study indicate that the application of restorative justice can be an alternative resolution of violent conflicts through a process of dialogue and deliberation involving the conflicting parties, prioritizing recovery, accountability, and the creation of mutual agreements. The application of this approach can also help reduce conflict escalation and provide space for the parties to resolve the problem more constructively. However, its implementation still faces several obstacles, including differing interests and perceptions between demonstrators and the police, the parties' willingness to reconcile, the complexity of violent incidents, and limited understanding of restorative justice mechanisms. Therefore, improved communication, transparency, and professionalism of police personnel are needed, as well as coordination with relevant parties to ensure the effective implementation of restorative justice in resolving conflicts between demonstrators and police personnel while ensuring legal certainty and justice.