Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ILMU USHULUDDIN Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat
Eva Nugraha
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tren Penerbitan Mushaf dalam Komodifikasi al-Qur’ān di Indonesia Eva Nugraha
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 2, Nomor 3, Januari 2015
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (670.706 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/jiu.v2i3.2634

Abstract

a sacred entity, muṣḥaf of the Qur’ān has long been the commodified objects. In Indonesia, it has been over150 years published and marketed withits various forms. In the last 10 years,Qur’ānic publishing phenomenon in Indonesia has developedin the new formandappearance, both in terms of conten tanda ccompanying theme. Fromthis background, this paperwants toexaminethe question: howtheQur’ānic publisherspresent,publishandmarket the product of the Qur’ānic muṣḥaf,whicheventuallybecamea trendinpublishingthe Qur’āninIndonesia?
Reassessing Al-Suyūṭī’s Claim of Tawqīfiyyah in Surah Naming: A Critical Analysis of Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān Eva Nugraha; Sahroni; Kholik Ramdan Mahesa
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/refleksi.v24.i1.49025

Abstract

This study critically examines al-Suyūṭī’s claim that all surah names in the Qur’an are tawqīfī, a theme that has received limited scholarly attention. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this article classifies al-Suyūṭī’s arguments in Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān and evaluates them based on the presence or absence of reliable prophetic or companion-based reports. The primary source for this research is Al-Itqān, supported by secondary literature from contemporary studies on Qur’anic sciences. The findings show that al-Suyūṭī’s arguments can be divided into two major categories: surah names supported by authentic hadith, and those derived from scholarly usage without strong textual basis. This study argues that al-Suyūṭī’s assertion of tawqīfiyyah is not fully supported by his own evidence, indicating inconsistencies in his methodological approach. The research contributes to Qur’anic studies by offering a more nuanced understanding of the historical development of surah naming and highlighting the interplay between revelation-based and ijtihād-based nomenclature.
Co-Authors Kholik Ramdan Mahesa sahroni