Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur`an dan Tafsir
Kholik Ramdan Mahesa
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TAFSĪR TAHLĪLĪ (INTERPRETASI ANALITIS) QS. AL-FURQĀN [25]: 1-11 Kholik Ramdan Mahesa
REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'`an dan Tafsir Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : IAIN Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/revelatia.v2i1.4488

Abstract

This paper examines the various interpretations of the tafsir scholars of surah al-Furqān. In the study of tafseer ('ulūm al-Qur'ān) there are several methods or ways of examining the contents of the al-Qur'an such as the Ijmali, Tahlīlī, Mauḍu'ī and muqaran methods. This study is focused on the interpretation of the tafsir scholars of surah al-Furqān [25]: 1-11 with the Tahlīlī Tafsir method approach. The author uses a literature study (Library Research) so that he finds findings on the interpretation of surah al-Furqān that the content in surah al-Furqān explains about monotheism towards Allah and Allah hates those who associate him (infidels). Keyword: Tafseer Tahlīlī, interpretations, Surah al-Furqān
Reassessing Al-Suyūṭī’s Claim of Tawqīfiyyah in Surah Naming: A Critical Analysis of Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān Eva Nugraha; Sahroni; Kholik Ramdan Mahesa
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/refleksi.v24.i1.49025

Abstract

This study critically examines al-Suyūṭī’s claim that all surah names in the Qur’an are tawqīfī, a theme that has received limited scholarly attention. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this article classifies al-Suyūṭī’s arguments in Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān and evaluates them based on the presence or absence of reliable prophetic or companion-based reports. The primary source for this research is Al-Itqān, supported by secondary literature from contemporary studies on Qur’anic sciences. The findings show that al-Suyūṭī’s arguments can be divided into two major categories: surah names supported by authentic hadith, and those derived from scholarly usage without strong textual basis. This study argues that al-Suyūṭī’s assertion of tawqīfiyyah is not fully supported by his own evidence, indicating inconsistencies in his methodological approach. The research contributes to Qur’anic studies by offering a more nuanced understanding of the historical development of surah naming and highlighting the interplay between revelation-based and ijtihād-based nomenclature.
Co-Authors Eva Nugraha sahroni