Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Journal of Islamic and Law Studies (JILS)
Saifudin Saifudin
Faculty of Law, Indonesian Islamic University
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Intra-party Democracy: The Practices on the Election of Prosperous Justice Party President Jamaludin Ghafur; Saifudin Saifudin
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 4 Issue 2, July 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol4.Iss2.638.pp154-171

Abstract

This paper will analyze the arrangements and practices for the election of chairperson (president) of the Prosperous Justice Party as one of the party's instruments in implementing intra-party democracy. There are two main issues to be discussed, namely: (i) has the regulation of the election of the president of the Prosperous Justice Party reflected democratic arrangements? (ii) has the democratic election been conducted in the Presidential Election for the Prosperous Justice Party? To answer this question, researchers examine all the laws and regulations relating to the legal issue in question. The laws and regulations referred to fall into two categories, namely primary and secondary legal materials. The results showed that both in terms of formulation of rules and practice, the election of the president of the Prosperous Justice Party is still far from democratic values. It is caused by the following five factors: (1) the right of nomination is not open to all party members but is nominated by the chairman of the Advisory Council, (2) the right to vote does not involve broad party elements but only becomes the authority of the members of the Advisory Council, (3) presidential candidates parties are not elected through a voting mechanism, but by appointment (acclamation), (4) the nature of the election is not competitive because it is always only followed by a single candidate, and (5) there is a limitation of the term of office of five years, but there is no limit on how many times. It has the potential for a party presidential position to be held by one person for an unlimited period.
Urgensi Dan Gagasan Konsep Pengadilan Khusus Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Saifudin Saifudin; Anang Zubaidy
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol 4, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (381.026 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v4i2.3812

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota (UU Pilkada) mengamanatkan dibentuknya pengadilan khusus Pilkada. Meskipun terbentuknya pengadilan khusus Pilkada mempunyai landasan yuridis, akan tetapi sampai sekarang pengadilan itu belum terbentuk. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini mengenai apa urgensi dibentuknya pengadilan khusus Pilkada dan bagaimana konsep kelembagaan pengadilan khusus Pilkada ke depan. Penggalian data penelitian dilakukan melalui metode wawancara dan diskusi kelompok terfokus (Focus Group Discussion). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembentukan pengadilan khusus pemilihan kepala daerah mendesak karena amanat UU Pilkada serta untuk mewujudkan proses penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif dan efisien. Ada tiga model konsep yang ditawarkan yaitu, Pertama, Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN); Kedua, Pembentukan Pengadilan Khusus yang Bersifat Ad hoc; Ketiga, Pembentukan Pengadilan Khusus yang Bersifat Permanen.
Co-Authors Anang Zubaidy Jamaludin Ghafur, Jamaludin