Jamiat Akadol
Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Hak Memilih Tuna Aksara Pada Pelaksanaan Pemilu Serentak 2019 Di Kota Singkawang Sri Sudono Saliro; Jamiat Akadol; Saiful Rachman; Agus Setiawan
Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jm.v5i1.725

Abstract

The purpose of this study, among others, first, is to analyze the laws and regulations concerning the right to choose illiterates in the 2019 simultaneous elections in the City of Singkawang. Second, for the evaluation of the legal aspects of the Election, specifically talking about the substance of the contents of the laws and regulations concerning providing assistance to illiterate voters. Third, to remind us together that the issue of the right to choose illiterates is an important issue that must be regulated in the election laws and regulations. The focus of the study in this paper is related to how to provide assistance to illiterate voters in the implementation of the 2019 simultaneous elections in Singkawang City. This research is a field research using descriptive qualitative method, meaning that the writer is directly involved with the resource person to reveal the social reality in the community. To obtain data the authors conducted observations and interviews. The findings can be concluded that illiterate voters cannot be provided with assistance when voting on the 2019 simultaneous elections in Singkawang City because there is no legal basis governing the provision of assistance to illiterate voters. So that the impact of the lack of legal basis, illiterate voters who come to polling stations and enter the voting booths, do not vote because of the confusion of the voters themselves.Keywords: Right to Choose, Illiteracy.
Kegagalan Mediasi: Sengketa Pertanahan di Kementerian Agraria Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Sambas Jamiat Akadol; Tamrin Muchsin; Sri Sudono Saliro
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 4, No 2 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1169.275 KB) | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v4i2.393

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis gagalnya mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Kantor Kementerian ATR/BPN Sambas. Penelitian ini berfokus pada bagaimana pelaksanaan mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Kantor Kementerian ATR/BPN Sambas, dan faktor apa yang menyebabkan gagalnya pelaksanaan mediasi terhadap penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan jenis yuridis empiris. Hasil temuan mengungkap bahwa pelaksanaan penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan melalui jalur mediasi dimulai dari adanya pengaduan, yang kemudian setelah memenuhi syarat akan mendapatkan nomor register, selanjutnya surat undangan pelaksanaan mediasi, dan selanjutnya pelaksanaan mediasi yang dipimpin oleh mediator. Gagalnya pelaksanaan mediasi disebabkan oleh faktor ketidakhadiran para pihak atau salah satu pihak, faktor waktu yang relatif lama, faktor data dukung, dan faktor mediator itu sendiri.AbstractThis research aims to analyze the failure of mediation in resolving land disputes at the Sambas ATR/BPN Ministry Office. This research focuses on how the implementation of mediation in land dispute resolution at the Office of the Ministry of ATR/BPN Sambas, and what factors cause the failure of mediation to resolve land disputes. This research is a descriptive with empirical juridical type. The findings reveal that the implementation of land dispute resolution through mediation starts with a complaint, which after fulfilling the requirements will get a register number, then a letter of invitation to carry out mediation, and then the implementation of mediation led by a mediator. The failure to carry out mediation was caused by the absence of the parties or one of the parties, the relatively long time factor, the supporting data factor, and the mediator factor itself.