Citi Rahmati Serfiyani
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Protection Against Status Determination of Suspects for Unpleasant Crimes After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1/PUU-XI/2013 Xavier Nugraha; Peter Jeremiah Setiawan; Citi Rahmati Serfiyani
Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam Vol 6 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jm.v6i2.1111

Abstract

Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and Article 21 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code are deemed to be contradicting Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution. Through the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013 excluding the phrase "unpleasant actions" because they are considered to cause multiple interpretations and put forward subjectivity. This article is exposed to arbitrary actions by the authorities to criminalize someone. In fact, after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013, there are still pre-trial cases of determining suspects based on unpleasant acts. The formulation of Article 335 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which is used after the decision, requires the fulfillment of 2 (two) elements, namely "using violence" or "threat of violence." Thus, in every indictment that wrote the phrase "unpleasant act" was considered a legal reason. Determination of a suspect because this is considered a formal defect
Pelindungan Hukum terhadap Minuman Alkohol Tradisional Khas Indonesia (Legal Protection towards Indonesian Traditional Alcoholic Beverages) Cita Yustisia Serfiyani; Iswi Hariyani; Citi Rahmati Serfiyani
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 11, No 2 (2020): JNH Vol 11 No 2 November 2020
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v11i2.1672

Abstract

Traditional alcoholic beverages have existed in Indonesian culture and society for various purposes. Its existence has been influenced by the concoction of alcoholic beverages which adversely affects the traditional alcoholic beverages’ image. These beverages are actually Intellectual Property Rights, IPR-based products of cultural heritage with indications of origin that have characteristics so that they cannot be compared to other countries’ alcoholic beverages, even though current regulations still regulate the opposite. This paper examines the legal protection of Indonesian traditional alcoholic beverages which are also adapted to their characteristics and the influence of Indonesian legal culture on these traditional alcoholic beverages. This research is a normative study with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach method with South Korea and France as a comparison. Prudent and objective legal protection from the point of view of IPR for traditional alcoholic beverages is expected to develop positive aspects while still anticipating negative ones. This study concludes that Indonesian traditional alcoholic beverages that fulfill 3 unique characteristics can be protected as intangible cultural heritage (public property) or an indication of origin (belongs to local communities), although what is more appropriate now is an indication of origin so that the Government needs to adjust the regulatory design, especially at the national level, according to the indication of origin. AbstrakMinuman alkohol tradisional telah ada di budaya masyarakat Indonesia dengan berbagai tujuan peruntukan. Perkembangan eksistensinya dipengaruhi oleh minuman beralkohol racikan yang memberi pengaruh buruk ke citra alkohol tradisional. Minuman alkohol tradisional sesungguhnya merupakan produk berbasis kekayaan intelektual di bidang warisan budaya dan indikasi asal yang memiliki karakteristik sehingga tidak dapat disamakan dengan minuman beralkohol lainnya, meskipun regulasi yang ada saat ini masih mengatur sebaliknya. Tulisan ini meneliti mengenai pelindungan hukum minuman alkohol tradisional khas Indonesia yang disesuaikan pula dengan karakteristiknya dan pengaruh budaya hukum masyarakat Indonesia terhadap minuman alkohol tradisional tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, serta pendekatan perbandingan dengan Korea Selatan dan Prancis. Pelindungan hukum yang bijak dan objektif dari sudut pandang Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) terhadap minuman alkohol tradisional diharapkan dapat mengembangkan aspek positif dengan tetap mengantisipasi aspek negatifnya. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa minuman alkohol tradisional khas Indonesia yang memenuhi 3 karakteristik khusus dapat dilindungi sebagai warisan budaya tak benda (milik publik) ataupun indikasi asal (milik masyarakat lokal) walaupun yang lebih tepat untuk diterapkan saat ini adalah indikasi asal sehingga Pemerintah perlu menyesuaikan perancangan regulasi di tingkat pusat sesuai indikasi asal.