Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Filsafat

RUANG PRIVAT INDIVIDU DALAM SISTEM KAWIN MAWIN MASYARAKAT SUMBA TIMUR Lailiy Muthmainnah; Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 20, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3421

Abstract

AbstractEast Sumba people have strong kinship and marital system.All of the living aspect of the East Sumba people managed by their kabihu. The various rights and duties will be emerge in the kabihu, include of this point is the custom duties related to the marriage process. Marriage in the East Sumba people have great symbol, not only for having a child but also to keep save uma marapu. The kinship of East Sumba people is patriarchy and the marriage system is always exogamy. It is taboo for marriage in one kabihu. Related to the kinship system in East Sumba, when a woman get married with a man from a different kabihu and her husband finishes his duties (belis), the woman will join her husband kabihu. Then, there is no kinship relation again between her and her old kabihu.Consequently, almost of the yera (wife’s family) make belis isimpossible to pay. From material aspect, belis process will give an advantage for the woman’s family but for the couple it will restraint their freedom. There is no private sphere for them because all of their marriage process will be judged and done by their family and kabihu.Keywords: East Sumba, marriage, uma marapu, kabihu, belis, yera,private sphere.
TINJAUAN FILOSOFIS PROBLEMA PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH Lailiy Muthmainnah
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 1 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3514

Abstract

AbstractModernisation as a term refers to the development processwhich has a lot of limitation, and one of this problem is aboutgarbage. Commonly, there are two big sources of garbage,industrializations and high mass consumtions. In fact, both of them are consequence of logical modernity. There are two reasons why garbage becomes a great problem in recent years. First, the quantity of garbage is overload, and second, its quality: most of the garbage is not bio-degradable. This problem will be more complicated because people usually use logic “not in my back yard” with their garbage. To respond this problem, modernity tries to transform in a new kind of development, that is usually called sustainable development. Although there are several different interpretations of sustainable development but it refers to The Brundtland Commission which defines sustainable development as a process of change in which the exploitation of resources, direction of investments, orientation of technological development, and institutional change are made consistent with future as well as present needs. For instance emphasize constancy of natural capital stock as a necessary condition for sustainability. Growth or wealth must be created without resources depletion. Exactly how this is to be achieved remains a mystery, but majority of sustainable development literature said that this condition will be achieved with using model ecological modernisation. Thus, the challenge is to find new technologies and to expand the role of the market in allocatingenvironment resources with the assumption that putting a price on the natural environment is only the way to protect it. In fact, this ways are used to solve the problem of garbage in recent years.Keywords: sustainability, ecology, garbage.
KRITIK FEMINIS TERHADAP DEVELOPMENTALISME Lailiy Muthmainnah
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 3 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3530

Abstract

AbstractFeminist activists made a breakthrough of attempt in reformulating a development theory. The basic issue was breaking the binary logic on the development theory. The feminists try to place gender relation at the center of theorization. To make it more concrete, every feminist movement establish projects and programs to improve the economic and social position of women. It is seen on their program, from Women in Development until Postmodern and Development. Although every feminist movement had a different vision and mission, but we can conclude that almost every critic to development have a similar attention to the androcentricism of science and unfairness on the distribution on material resources that occur on the process of development.Keywords: Feminist activists, gender relation, development.
State of Nature J.J. Rousseau dan Implikasinya terhadap Bentuk Ideal Negara Lailiy Muthmainnah
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 21, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.4744

Abstract

J.J. Rousseau conception about state of nature is not state of war but peace condition, abundant resources, and rooted in the pre history era. The condition changed when the savage man had been in transition to the civil society. In this situation conflict of interest appears and the State is needed to solve this problem. Rousseau proposes partisipatory democracy as ideality of the State. In the partisipatory democracy a souvereign will have important position because it will make a legislation. Because of that, all citizens must have a good political education so that their preference will be similar to general will.    Keywords: state of nature, J.J. Rousseau, State, partisipatory democracy, general will.
Science, Power, and Democracy: A Critical Perspective of Political Influence on Knowledge Production Islami, Moch Zihad; Muthmainnah, Lailiy
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 1-2 (2025): Special Issue 2025: Law and Politics
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.100391

Abstract

This study aims to explore the relationship between science, power, and democracy. This relationship stems from the fundamental argument that science is always linked to values, whether political, ideological, or even economic interests. While science can contribute positively to transforming public life for the better, it can also give rise to exclusivity and elitism in the scientific community, which can undermine democratic principles and values. This study demonstrates that the relationship between science and politics is ambivalent, as it can both strengthen the legitimacy of public governance and create the risk of technocracy and expert dominance, leading to the public being perceived as lacking adequate epistemic capacity in certain scientific fields. Therefore, efforts are needed to steer science toward a true public interest through the democratization of science, both procedurally and substantively. However, normative boundaries remain crucial: when emerging public values are discriminatory, scientists are obligated to reject them, as they contradict the egalitarian principles that underlie democracy. Furthermore, public trust in science must be maintained by ensuring that the public is fully imagined and involved in the knowledge production process. Thus, public-oriented science must be committed to the values of humanity and equality.