Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Filsafat Pembaharuan Hukum Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama dan Lintas Budaya Jurnal Filsafat Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion
Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
RUANG PRIVAT INDIVIDU DALAM SISTEM KAWIN MAWIN MASYARAKAT SUMBA TIMUR Muthmainnah, Lailiy; Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 20, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractEast Sumba people have strong kinship and marital system.All of the living aspect of the East Sumba people managed by their kabihu. The various rights and duties will be emerge in the kabihu, include of this point is the custom duties related to the marriage process. Marriage in the East Sumba people have great symbol, not only for having a child but also to keep save uma marapu. The kinship of East Sumba people is patriarchy and the marriage system is always exogamy. It is taboo for marriage in one kabihu. Related to the kinship system in East Sumba, when a woman get married with a man from a different kabihu and her husband finishes his duties (belis), the woman will join her husband kabihu. Then, there is no kinship relation again between her and her old kabihu.Consequently, almost of the yera (wife’s family) make belis isimpossible to pay. From material aspect, belis process will give an advantage for the woman’s family but for the couple it will restraint their freedom. There is no private sphere for them because all of their marriage process will be judged and done by their family and kabihu.Keywords: East Sumba, marriage, uma marapu, kabihu, belis, yera,private sphere.
THOMAS KUHN DAN TRADISI-INOVASI DALAM LANGKAH METODOLOGIS RISET ILMIAH Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 3 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractThomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. There is a difference between the type of scientific methodological research in normal scienceand that in revolutionary science. Scientists during normal science conduct their research activities restricted on the box of paradigmshared with the result that scientific research in normal science are always progressive in terms of cumulative progress. Scientists are tied to the tradition of paradigm-shared, and they difficult to release their dependence upon the paradigm-shared moreover to make innovation to the paradigm. Meanwhile, scientists during revolutionary science conduct their research activities based on the observations, experiments, and idea beyond the generally accepted paradigm which becomes questionable because of its failure to solve the crisis. Scientific research in revolutionary science is always progressive in terms of non-cumulative progress. Scientists become innovated person who see the crisis from a new perspective rather than from the tradition of the old-paradigm.Keywords: paradigm, normal science, scientific revolution
RUANG PRIVAT INDIVIDU DALAM SISTEM KAWIN MAWIN MASYARAKAT SUMBA TIMUR Muthmainnah, Lailiy; Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 20, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (241.106 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3421

Abstract

AbstractEast Sumba people have strong kinship and marital system.All of the living aspect of the East Sumba people managed by their kabihu. The various rights and duties will be emerge in the kabihu, include of this point is the custom duties related to the marriage process. Marriage in the East Sumba people have great symbol, not only for having a child but also to keep save uma marapu. The kinship of East Sumba people is patriarchy and the marriage system is always exogamy. It is taboo for marriage in one kabihu. Related to the kinship system in East Sumba, when a woman get married with a man from a different kabihu and her husband finishes his duties (belis), the woman will join her husband kabihu. Then, there is no kinship relation again between her and her old kabihu.Consequently, almost of the yera (wife’s family) make belis isimpossible to pay. From material aspect, belis process will give an advantage for the woman’s family but for the couple it will restraint their freedom. There is no private sphere for them because all of their marriage process will be judged and done by their family and kabihu.Keywords: East Sumba, marriage, uma marapu, kabihu, belis, yera,private sphere.
Konsep Materialitas-Spiritualitas dalam Historisitas Pierre Teilhard De Chardin Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1577.768 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31653

Abstract

Teilhard memandang kesadaran diri pada manusia sebagai perkembangan aspek spiritualitas yang didukung aspek materialitas.
THOMAS KUHN DAN TRADISI-INOVASI DALAM LANGKAH METODOLOGIS RISET ILMIAH Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 3 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (170.492 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3526

Abstract

AbstractThomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. There is a difference between the type of scientific methodological research in normal scienceand that in revolutionary science. Scientists during normal science conduct their research activities restricted on the box of paradigmshared with the result that scientific research in normal science are always progressive in terms of cumulative progress. Scientists are tied to the tradition of paradigm-shared, and they difficult to release their dependence upon the paradigm-shared moreover to make innovation to the paradigm. Meanwhile, scientists during revolutionary science conduct their research activities based on the observations, experiments, and idea beyond the generally accepted paradigm which becomes questionable because of its failure to solve the crisis. Scientific research in revolutionary science is always progressive in terms of non-cumulative progress. Scientists become innovated person who see the crisis from a new perspective rather than from the tradition of the old-paradigm.Keywords: paradigm, normal science, scientific revolution
RUANG PRIVAT INDIVIDU DALAM SISTEM KAWIN MAWIN MASYARAKAT SUMBA TIMUR Lailiy Muthmainnah; Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 20, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3421

Abstract

AbstractEast Sumba people have strong kinship and marital system.All of the living aspect of the East Sumba people managed by their kabihu. The various rights and duties will be emerge in the kabihu, include of this point is the custom duties related to the marriage process. Marriage in the East Sumba people have great symbol, not only for having a child but also to keep save uma marapu. The kinship of East Sumba people is patriarchy and the marriage system is always exogamy. It is taboo for marriage in one kabihu. Related to the kinship system in East Sumba, when a woman get married with a man from a different kabihu and her husband finishes his duties (belis), the woman will join her husband kabihu. Then, there is no kinship relation again between her and her old kabihu.Consequently, almost of the yera (wife’s family) make belis isimpossible to pay. From material aspect, belis process will give an advantage for the woman’s family but for the couple it will restraint their freedom. There is no private sphere for them because all of their marriage process will be judged and done by their family and kabihu.Keywords: East Sumba, marriage, uma marapu, kabihu, belis, yera,private sphere.
THOMAS KUHN DAN TRADISI-INOVASI DALAM LANGKAH METODOLOGIS RISET ILMIAH Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 3 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3526

Abstract

AbstractThomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. There is a difference between the type of scientific methodological research in normal scienceand that in revolutionary science. Scientists during normal science conduct their research activities restricted on the box of paradigmshared with the result that scientific research in normal science are always progressive in terms of cumulative progress. Scientists are tied to the tradition of paradigm-shared, and they difficult to release their dependence upon the paradigm-shared moreover to make innovation to the paradigm. Meanwhile, scientists during revolutionary science conduct their research activities based on the observations, experiments, and idea beyond the generally accepted paradigm which becomes questionable because of its failure to solve the crisis. Scientific research in revolutionary science is always progressive in terms of non-cumulative progress. Scientists become innovated person who see the crisis from a new perspective rather than from the tradition of the old-paradigm.Keywords: paradigm, normal science, scientific revolution
Konsep Materialitas-Spiritualitas dalam Historisitas Pierre Teilhard De Chardin Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31653

Abstract

Teilhard memandang kesadaran diri pada manusia sebagai perkembangan aspek spiritualitas yang didukung aspek materialitas.
Rethinking Merdeka Belajar: Toward an Ethical and Epistemic Reconstruction through Pesantren Pedagogy Moch Najib Yuliantoro; Siti Murtiningsih; Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti; Irfan L Sarhindi
Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion Vol 11, No 1 (2026): Analisa Journal of Social Science and Religion
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18784/analisa.v11i1.4015

Abstract

This study examines the concept of Merdeka Belajar as a contemporary educational reform in Indonesia and critically analyses its ethical and epistemic foundations through the lens of pesantren-based religious pedagogy. While existing studies largely focus on pedagogical innovation, curriculum flexibility, and digital transformation, they often overlook the deeper philosophical dimensions of knowledge and moral formation. This research employs a qualitative library-based approach using critical and comparative philosophical analysis of educational policy, Islamic epistemology, and religious pedagogy. The findings reveal that Merdeka Belajar is predominantly framed within a progressive and instrumental paradigm, emphasising autonomy, flexibility, and competence development, yet it lacks a coherent ethical and epistemic foundation. In contrast, pesantren-based education represents a systematic knowledge tradition that integrates revelation, reason, and lived experience into a unified ethical–epistemic framework. This integration enables the formation of moral subjectivity, in which knowledge is not only acquired but also embodied through ethical discipline and spiritual practice. The study argues that pesantren-based religious pedagogy provides a critical conceptual resource for reconstructing the meaning of education beyond instrumental rationality, positioning education as a process of ethical self-formation and epistemic responsibility. This research contributes to the philosophical discourse on education by integrating ethical and epistemic perspectives into contemporary educational reform.
Ethical Fragmentation and Public Moral Reasoning: Teachers, Religious Pluralism, and Kantian Evaluation in Indonesia Samsul Ma’arif Mujiharto; Siti Murtiningsih; Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama dan Lintas Budaya Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/rjsalb.v9i3.47898

Abstract

This study analyzes the ethical architecture of the teaching profession in Indonesia by examining how teacher ethics is governed and evaluated within a context of institutional and religious pluralism. It seeks to explain why teacher ethics has largely functioned as an instrument of professional governance rather than as a framework of public moral reasoning that supports teachers’ moral agency. This study adopts a qualitative normative–philosophical approach, analyzing Indonesian education policy documents—particularly the Regulation of the Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology No. 67 of 2024—and codes of ethics issued by major teacher professional organizations (PGRI, IGI, PERGUNU, and Muhammadiyah). The analysis employs conceptual and argumentative methods, using Kantian ethics as an evaluative framework, while media-reported cases are referenced illustratively to contextualize normative tensions. The study identifies three central findings. First, teacher ethics in Indonesia is primarily framed in the language of compliance, discipline, and procedure, positioning ethics as a mechanism of professional governance. Second, the pluralism of organizational codes of ethics produces ethical fragmentation, whereby similar professional actions may be evaluated differently depending on institutional affiliation and adjudicative authority. Third, this configuration constrains teachers’ moral agency by prioritizing administrative conformity over rational moral justification that is public and universal in character. The findings suggest that addressing ethical fragmentation in the teaching profession requires more than regulatory harmonization or procedural standardization. Instead, there is a need for a shared framework of public moral reasoning that enables plural religious and institutional ethics to be evaluated through consistent and publicly justifiable criteria. Such a framework has implications for education policy, professional ethical governance, and the cultivation of teachers as autonomous moral agents in plural societies. This study contributes to religious studies and professional ethics scholarship by reframing ethical fragmentation not as a technical governance problem but as a problem of public moral justification within plural moral traditions. By employing Kantian ethics as an evaluative lens rather than a prescriptive doctrine, the study offers an original conceptual contribution to debates on religious pluralism, professional ethics, and moral agency in highly regulated educational contexts such as Indonesia.
Co-Authors Dian Paula April Juwan Irfan L Sarhindi Lailiy Muthmainnah Rr. Siti Murtiningsih Samsul Ma’arif Mujiharto Siti Murtiningsih Yuliantoro, Moch Najib