Ninik Darmini
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK DAN ASAS KEPRIBADIAN DALAM KONTRAK-KONTRAK OUTSOURCING Taufiq El Rahman; R. A. Antari Innaka; Ari Hernawan; Ninik Darmini; Murti Pramuwardhani Dewi
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 23, No 3 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (377.584 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16178

Abstract

The freedom of contract applies for parties n outsourcing contracts, even though it is not applicable for outsourcing worker. There are violation in personality principle where the outsourcing contract is applicable for third party. The legal protection for outsourcing worker is also weak. Asas kebebasan berkontrak berlaku bagi para pihak dalam perjanjian outsourcing tetapi tidak berlaku bagi tenaga kerja outsourcing. Terdapat penyimpangan terhadap asas kepribadian, dimana perjanjian outsourcing berlaku bagi tenaga kerja outsourcing yang berkedudukan sebagai pihak ketiga. Perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga kerja outsourcing relatif lemah.
Pertimbangan Hakim Menetapkan Asal Muasal Hibah Wasiat Terhadap Salah Satu Ahli Waris Adat Batak Toba Ambarita, Mylanta; Ninik Darmini
Notaire Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v8i3.79320

Abstract

This study examines an inheritance dispute among siblings in the Toba Batak indigenous community who have long settled in Jakarta (new local). The case proceeded through all judicial levels in Indonesia, from the District Court to the Judicial Review. The research analyzes judges’ legal considerations in determining the origin and validity of a testamentary gift granted to one heir, viewed from the perspectives of the Civil Code and Toba Batak customary law. Employing a descriptive normative legal method, this study relies mainly on secondary legal materials, supported by interviews with civil judges, and analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal divergent judicial interpretations. The District and High Courts emphasized formal aspects by validating Deed of Gift of Will No. 3/2005 as an authentic notarial deed. In contrast, the Supreme Court and Judicial Review prioritized material aspects, upholding substantive justice and protecting heirs’ legitime portie. Consequently, the testator’s freedom is limited to ensure fairness and the protection of heirs’ rights. The Judicial Review, which annulled eleven such deeds, affirms that the validity of testamentary gifts must be assessed both formally and substantively, consistent with the Civil Code and Toba Batak customary law principles.