Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Edi Hudiata
Pengadilan Agama Banjarbaru
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
DELIMITATION OF FREEDOM OF CONTRACT PRINCIPLE AND JUDGE’S CORRECTIVE FUNCTION IN ASSESSING THE PARTIES’ POSITIONS ON AN AGREEMENT Muhammad Natsir Asnawi; Edi Hudiata
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 29, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (409.533 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16889

Abstract

The principle of freedom of contract established for much types of contract. This principle concerned onhow parties state their mind freely into the contract clauses. The primordial concept of freedom of contractwas reduced based on Indonesian judiciary practice. This normative research of law tries to analyse theconcept alteration of meaning and implementation of freedom of contract in Indonesian Judiciary practice.The Supreme Court of Indonesia through its precedent provides broader authority to the Judges in orderto supervise and remedy the unbalance stand of parties on a contract they state which causes one or moreconsiderations cannot be or make difficulties to perform. The result of this research show us that freedomof contract principle is confined by proportionality, appropriateness, and justice principles toward partiesin a contract stated.
REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PASAR MODAL SYARIAH: PENGUATAN ASPEK REGULASI UNTUK MEMBERIKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM Edi Hudiata
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.2.2017.297-316

Abstract

The regulation of the Islamic capital market following the rules contained in Law 8/1995 on Capital Market, DSN MUI Fatwa No. 40 / IX / 2003, Bapepam-LK Number IX.A.13, No. IX.A.14, and No. II. K.1 From that rules, nothing has clearly set the Islamic capital market dispute resolution, both litigation and non-litigation resulting in a legal vacuum (leemten in het recht). Islamic economic dispute settlement provisions, including the dispute over the Islamic capital market, is only found in Law 3/2006. Through quantitative research methods, the study sought to harmonize the empty rules at the same time filling thus legal vacuum. The research concluded that the settlement litigation of disputes in Islamic capital markets settled in the Religious Court, while in non-litigation resolved through BASYARNAS (National Sharia Arbitration Board) and / or as other civil disputes can also be resolved through Alternative Dispute Resolution in accordance with Law 30/1999.Keywords: legal vacuum, the Islamic capital market.
Co-Authors Muhammad Natsir Asnawi