Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Keberterimaan Amil Zakat LAZIS NU dan LAZIS Muhammadiyah terhadap Hegemoni Negara dalam Pengelolaan Zakat Muhamad Nasrudin
Nizham Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 5 No 2 (2017): Islam dan Ekonomi
Publisher : Postgraduate State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (325.096 KB)

Abstract

While many Zakat Management Organizations (ZMO) rejected state hegemony through Law No. 23/2011 on Zakat Management, LAZIS NU and LAZIS Muhammadiyah, two ZMO from the largest Islamic organizations in Indonesia have little to say, even tend to be silent. From here, this paper seeks to find out and reconstruct acceptence of two LAZISs to the state hegemony in the management of zakat. Both LAZISs have acceptance that tend to be neutral and even lead to positive. This is because, Law No 23/2011 is considered in harmony with the function and role of the State and it supports civil society. Implicitly, both organizations affirm UUPZ 23/2011 because it is not affected by the hegemonic state.
PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA UJARAN KEBENCIAN BERBASIS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DENGAN PENDEKATAN FIQIH ISLAH DAN TEORI KOMPENSASI MARAH (Studi Kasus Ujaran Kebencian Gus Nur terhadap NU) Muhamad Nasrudin; Ibnu Akbar Maliki
Nizham Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 9 No 01 (2021): Jurnal Nizham
Publisher : Postgraduate State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/nizham.v9i01.3414

Abstract

Since the ITE Law was enacted, public complaints about hate speech on social media have increased, one of which is the case of Gus Nur's hate speech against NU. In various cases, the process of resolving cases in the Court tends to be protracted and does not provide satisfaction for the parties, due to the monodisciplinary approach to litigation in law. Therefore, a breakthrough is needed so that such cases can be resolved quickly, effectively, and with a win-win solution. This article seeks to examine restorative justice breakthroughs with fiqh islah and psychology tools to resolve hate speech cases. To make it more operational, this article takes the case of Gus Nur vs. NU for analysis. This article is written based on empirical legal research that is qualitative in nature with the approach of sociology and legal psychology. The primary data source is a video entitled “Gus Nur & Refly Harun Part 2: Who is the Ideal President? NU Cultural Or Structural?” on the Munjiat Channel Youtube account. While the secondary sources consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The primary legal materials are Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and the Decree of the Director General of Badilum of the Supreme Court No. 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Restorative Justice in General Courts. Secondary legal materials are books and journal articles on restorative justice, fiqh ishlah, and anger compensation theory in psychology. After the data was collected by indirect observation and documentation, then it was analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that psychologically Gus Nur was in a state of anger when he made hate speech, thus opening the possibility that he regretted his words which tended to attack NU. While in the review of fiqh ishlah, the most relevant ta'zir sanctions are warnings and apologizing to the NU kiai he mentioned in the hate speech video. With the character of NU who really respects his kiai, when the kiai apologize to Gus Nur, then NU residents can easily forgive Gus Nur. Meanwhile, the restorative justice strategy in this case can be done by taking penal mediation and name rehabilitation.
Perlindungan HAM bagi Perempuan Pekerja Seni Muhamad Nasrudin; Rosyidatul Khusniah; Safitri Yurike Pristiani
Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Vol 1 No 02 (2019)
Publisher : Center of Gender Studies and Child of State Islamic Institute of Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1023.19 KB) | DOI: 10.32332/jsga.v1i02.2127

Abstract

Idealnya setiap warga negara mendapatkan jaminan akan pengakuan dan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak asasinya. Meskipun demikian, masih terdapat banyak kondisi di mana ada warga negara yang hak-hak dasarnya belum mendapatkan perhatian secara paripurna. Perempuan pekerja seni pertunjukan adalah contoh menarik bagaimana pengakuan, pemenuhan, dan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak asasinya mendapatkan tantangan yang cukup nyata. Dalam artikel ini disajikan perempuan pekerja seni di tiga Sanggar Kesenian di Kota Metro dan daerah penyangganya. Perempuan pekerja seni berada dalam persimpangan dan empat domain yang saling tarik-menarik: berekspresi, hak akan pendidikan, hak akan pekerjaan yang layak, dan penjagaan terhadap tradisi. Dalam tarik-menarik di antara keempat domain tersebut, seringkali hak akan pendidikan dan hak akan pekerjaan (serta penghasilan) yang layak berada pada posisi terkalahkan. Dialektika antara ruang privat (keluarga) vs tiga ruang publik (sanggar, sekolah/kampus, dan masyarakat) bisa menempatkan perempuan pada posisi yang (ter)lemah(kan).