Yunus Basrewan
Department Of Orthopedic, Universitas Airlangga Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Modern and Classic Wound Dressing Comparison in Wound Healing, Comfort and Cost Ferdiansyah Mahyudin; Mouli Edward; M Hardian Basuki; Yunus Basrewan; Ansari Rahman
Jurnal Ners Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020): APRIL 2020
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (70.215 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/jn.v15i1.16597

Abstract

 Introduction: Wound care has also developed rapidly after the dissemination of the concept of TIME (Tissue, Infection, Moisture, and Wound Edge) in modern dressing (MD). The aim of this study was to compare modern dressings (MDs) and classic dressings (CDs) in terms of patient comfort, cost effectiveness and wound healing.Methods: A prospective study design with total of 25 participants. The sampling technique used was consecutive sampling. Patient comfort was assessed through the frequency of wound care and pain scale using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Cost-effectiveness was assessed using direct and indirect costs. Wound healing was assessed using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) score. The data was analyzed using the independent t and Mann-Whitney tests.Results: In terms of comfort, the mean for the number of times that wound care was performed and the pain scale in the participants using MD was (3.07 ± 0.88 times and VAS 4.59  ± 0.72, respectively), which is less compared to using CD (4.60  ±  1.84 times each and VAS 5.43  ± 0.75). Referring to the indirect and direct costs, MD (13.67  ± 6.09 and 527.63  ± 84.47, respectively) has the same cost-effectiveness as CD (14.00  ± 7.64 and 482.68 ± 98.08, respectively). In terms of healing, the mean of the BWAT score in MD (31.26  ± 1.69) was better compared to CD (33.07  ± 1.65).Conclusion: The application of MD has the same cost-effectiveness as CD with a more satisfactory outcome for the wounds in terms of comfort and healing.
Re-Fracture as Impact of Rigid Implant and Bone Osteoporosis: A Case Report Huda Fajar Arianto; Yunus Basrewan
Journal Orthopaedi and Traumatology Surabaya Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/joints.v11i1.2022.28-32

Abstract

Background: The increasing life expectancy of the world population associated with osteopenia and osteoporosis leads to low-energy fractures, especially in the lower limb. The overture of locking plates has widened the area of close fracture fixation, and it is essential to justify and optimize their usage. This study aims to report the potential postoperative re-fracture after implant removal and as a consequence of bone osteoporosis.Case report: We present a re-fracture of proximal femur case in 60 years old female after a trivial fall into her right femur. This patient underwent a removal implant surgery a week before in the same spot where she fell. The open surgery was made with the same incision, and we do the Open Reduction Internal Fixation for her. Discussion: The major design of the fixation tool is to secure the fracture with less effect on native axial load stress from the whole bone. Stress shielding caused due to firm bone-implant results in its resorption. The bone degradation underneath gives rise to the plate's collapse, resulting in repeated bone breakage. Early discharge, continued weight-bearing training for proximal femur fractures were associated with speedy improvement in daily activities. The photodynamic polymer liquid was the latest technology for bone stabilization.Conclusion: Rigid bone plates can cause stress shielding, and when the implants are removed, re-fracture easily happens. Therefore, discharge of patients quickly for weight-bearing training in proximal femur fractures was encouraged to promote better healing.
Giant Cell Tumor of The Proximal Phalanx of The Index Finger of The Hand: A Rare Case Report Mouli Edward; Ferdiansyah Mahyudin; Muhammad Hardian Basuki; Yunus Basrewan; Caesar Haryo Bimoseno
Journal Orthopaedi and Traumatology Surabaya Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): October 2022
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/joints.v11i2.2022.49-55

Abstract

Background: Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a relatively common type of benign tumor involving the epiphyseal region of tubular bones, but GCT rarely occurs at hand (1–4% of all GCT). GCT within the hand tends to be more aggressive and recurs more rapidly in hand than in other locations. Most authors prefer curettage or resection with reconstruction to maintain anatomical and functional integrity.Case Report: A 27-year-old man with a chief complaint of an enlarged lump and pain in the index finger of his left hand. These lumps appeared three months ago. Plain radiographs showed lytic, eccentric, geographic lesions with well-defined borders and narrow transition zones. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a primary aggressive bone tumor with extension to the surrounding soft tissue. Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) revealed the lesion as a Bone Giant Cell Tumor. The patient then underwent local resection and reconstruction using an allograft. Range of movement (ROM) measurements and DASH scores were evaluated.Discussion: Radiographic and MRI examinations showed characteristic cortical breach, and FNAB showed multinucleated giant cell spread. After treatment, the patient was found to be pain-free, have an improved ROM, and reduced disability. There was no recurrence observed. Conclusion: Despite the tendency for hand GCT to be more aggressive, local resection and reconstruction using an allograft with adjuvant hydrogen peroxide can reduce recurrence and disability.