Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Case Law
Herdi Wibowo
Universitas Galuh
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN BARANG ELEKTRONIK JENIS LAPTOP TERHADAP PASAL 36 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA DI PT. ADIRA QUANTUM MULTIFINANCE TASIKMALAYA: Array Herdi Wibowo; Sirrinawati; Eka Jaenal Arifin; Arif Hermawan
Case Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Case Law
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (438.855 KB)

Abstract

In reality on the ground, many people who take leasing goods embezzled the goods which were the objects of the leasing and contradicted the existing regulations. In this study the authors formulated the problem to what extent law enforcement criminal acts of embezzlement of electronic goods of laptop types against Article 36 of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees at PT. Adira Quantum Multifinance Tasikmalaya; constraints and efforts. The method used in this study is a descriptive analytical method, which is a way to solve problems or answer the problems being faced, carried out by way of collecting, classification, data analysis concluded with the aim to make a picture of a situation objectively, with a juridical approach method normative. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that law enforcement of the embezzlement of electronic goods of laptop types against article 36 of Law Number 42 of 1999 Concerning Fiduciary Guarantees at PT. Adira Quantum Multifinance Tasikmalaya is not implemented in accordance with the provisions of article 36 of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. The constraints are the existence of goods which are used as fiduciary collateral is no longer in the hands of the debtor and is in a third party that cannot be traced to its existence, still found incomplete administrative requirements of goods which are the object of fiduciary collateral at issue by the finance company, and requires time long time in taking or executing goods that are guaranteed. Efforts are to forcibly take / confiscate electronic goods in the form of laptops and report them to the police, because the company has been unable to take action against the debtor, because the debtor is difficult to find or cannot show / surrender the goods as collateral.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS HAK REPRODUKSI PEREMPUAN BAGI PEREMPUAN KORBAN PERKOSAAN DALAM MELAKUKAN ABORSI TANPA KEDARURATAN MEDIS (LEGAL PROTECTION FOR WOMEN’S PRODUCTIVE RIGHTS OF WOMAN VICTIMS OF RAPE IN ABORTION WITHOUT TAKING MEDICAL EMERGENCY INDICATIO: Array Herdi Wibowo; Ida Farida; Dewi Mulyanti; R. Yenni Muliani
Case Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Case Law
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (440.554 KB)

Abstract

Penulisan jurnal ini membahas mengenai kajian yuridis pengguguran kandungan (abortus) dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia terkait dengan perlindungan hukum bagi hak reproduksi perempuan ketika menjadi korban perkosaan. Hal ini dilatar belakangi adanya pengguguran kandungan (abortus) yang dilakukan wanita yang menjadi korban pemerkosaan yang seharusnya dilindungi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. KUHPidana yang mana melarang semua tindak pidana pengguguran kandungan dipidana tanpa alasan tetapi kini telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan yang mana pengguguran kandungan akibat pemerkosaan diperbolehkan. Perlindungan hak-hak korban perkosaan dalam peraturan perundangan-undangan di Indonesia diatur secara umum dalam KUHAP dan diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Undang-Undang 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan serta Peraturan Pemerintah No. 61 Tahun 2014 yang mana memberikan perlindungan fisik, psikis dan hukum.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN BARANG ELEKTRONIK JENIS LAPTOP TERHADAP PASAL 36 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA DI PT. ADIRA QUANTUM MULTIFINANCE TASIKMALAYA: Array Herdi Wibowo; Sirrinawati Sirrinawati; Eka Jaenal Arifin; Arif Hermawan
Case Law : Journal of Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Case Law : Journal of Law | Juli 2020
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/caselaw.v1i1.2289

Abstract

In reality on the ground, many people who take leasing goods embezzled the goods which were the objects of the leasing and contradicted the existing regulations. In this study the authors formulated the problem to what extent law enforcement criminal acts of embezzlement of electronic goods of laptop types against Article 36 of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees at PT. Adira Quantum Multifinance Tasikmalaya; constraints and efforts. The method used in this study is a descriptive analytical method, which is a way to solve problems or answer the problems being faced, carried out by way of collecting, classification, data analysis concluded with the aim to make a picture of a situation objectively, with a juridical approach method normative. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that law enforcement of the embezzlement of electronic goods of laptop types against article 36 of Law Number 42 of 1999 Concerning Fiduciary Guarantees at PT. Adira Quantum Multifinance Tasikmalaya is not implemented in accordance with the provisions of article 36 of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. The constraints are the existence of goods which are used as fiduciary collateral is no longer in the hands of the debtor and is in a third party that cannot be traced to its existence, still found incomplete administrative requirements of goods which are the object of fiduciary collateral at issue by the finance company, and requires time long time in taking or executing goods that are guaranteed. Efforts are to forcibly take / confiscate electronic goods in the form of laptops and report them to the police, because the company has been unable to take action against the debtor, because the debtor is difficult to find or cannot show / surrender the goods as collateral.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS HAK REPRODUKSI PEREMPUAN BAGI PEREMPUAN KORBAN PERKOSAAN DALAM MELAKUKAN ABORSI TANPA KEDARURATAN MEDIS (LEGAL PROTECTION FOR WOMEN’S PRODUCTIVE RIGHTS OF WOMAN VICTIMS OF RAPE IN ABORTION WITHOUT TAKING MEDICAL EMERGENCY INDICATIO: Array Herdi Wibowo; Ida Farida; Dewi Mulyanti; R. Yenni Muliani
Case Law : Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Case Law : Journal of Law | Juli 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/caselaw.v2i2.2517

Abstract

Penulisan jurnal ini membahas mengenai kajian yuridis pengguguran kandungan (abortus) dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia terkait dengan perlindungan hukum bagi hak reproduksi perempuan ketika menjadi korban perkosaan. Hal ini dilatar belakangi adanya pengguguran kandungan (abortus) yang dilakukan wanita yang menjadi korban pemerkosaan yang seharusnya dilindungi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. KUHPidana yang mana melarang semua tindak pidana pengguguran kandungan dipidana tanpa alasan tetapi kini telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan yang mana pengguguran kandungan akibat pemerkosaan diperbolehkan. Perlindungan hak-hak korban perkosaan dalam peraturan perundangan-undangan di Indonesia diatur secara umum dalam KUHAP dan diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Undang-Undang 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan serta Peraturan Pemerintah No. 61 Tahun 2014 yang mana memberikan perlindungan fisik, psikis dan hukum.
Co-Authors Arif Hermawan Eka Jaenal Arifin Ida Farida Mulyanti, Dewi R. Yenni Muliani Sirrinawati Sirrinawati Sirrinawati