Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Law, Development and Justice Review
Rahandy Rizki Prananda
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : LAW REFORM

 1 
THE URGENCY OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION AS A LEGAL PROTECTION INSTRUMENT TOWARD TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN INDONESIA Pulung Widhi Hari Hananto; Rahandy Rizki Prananda
LAW REFORM Vol 15, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (157.988 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v15i1.23355

Abstract

Traditional knowledge products characterized by geographical conditions are economically and spiritually valuable assets for the people of the area. Potential misleading of geographical indication goods requires a legal instrument that provides protection. Geographical Indication (GI) is one of the instruments of intellectual wealth that has its own characteristics. This study aims to examine the regulations of GeograpicaI Indication in the national and international levels, the implications of geographical indications for stakeholders and the ideal form of setting geographical indications in Indonesia. This study uses normative juridical methods and comparative studies. The results of the study show that the GI’s regulation applied in Indonesia adheres to a system of merging with brand regulation. The implications of GI’s registration bring a comprehensive impact on the economy and the legitimacy of traditional knowledge. After reviewing the comparison of the protection of geographical indications in Ethiopia and Jamaica, the authors recommend to separate the arrangements for geographical indications with brands (sui generis)
LEGAL POLITICAL OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARK PROTECTION REVIEWED FROM DEVELOPMENT OF TRADEMARK LAW IN INDONESIA TO AVOID FRAUDULENT COMPETITION Moch Alfi Muzakki; Kholis Roisah; Rahandy Rizki Prananda
LAW REFORM Vol 14, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (115.257 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v14i2.20865

Abstract

The achievement of a Trademark in order to become famous is not an easy job, the obstacle of building a Trademark into a well-known trademark is a factor that encourages the emergence of fraudulent competition that is detrimental to others. The Issuance  of Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications is deemed unable to accommodate fraudulent competition. This study aims to examine the law politics of famous Trademark protection in terms of the development of Trademark law in Indonesia and to compare the protection of famous Trademarks in Indonesia with other countries to avoid fraudulent competition in the use  Trademarks. This study is applied a normative juridical approach. The results of the study show that even though Indonesia has made  amendment toward Trademark Law (UUM) 5 times, there is no specific definition of a well-known brand within  Indonesia. Indonesia does not yet have arrangements regarding fraudulent competition in the brand, even though Indonesia has anti-competition laws, but fraudulent competition in Indonesia does not use it as a legal basis.Keywords: Trademark; Well-Known Trademark;  Fraudulent Competition.
Co-Authors Kholis Roisah Moch Alfi Muzakki Pulung Widhi Hari Hananto Zil Aidi