Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Law, Development and Justice Review
Rahandy Rizki Prananda
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Kedudukan Pengemudi Transportasi Online Dalam Perjanjian Kemitraan Dengan Perusahaan Penyedia Aplikasi Transportasi Online Rahandy Rizki Prananda; Zil Aidi
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.v2i2.6139

Abstract

Penelitian yang menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris serta metode analisis kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan dan menganalisis problematika hukum dalam perjanjian kemitraan dalam praktek bisnis transportasi online. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa hubungan hukum antara mitra pengemudi dengan perusahaan penyedia aplikasi adalah hubungan kemitraan yang tidak tunduk pada Undang-Undang No.13 tahun tentang Ketenagakerjan, namun pola hubungan kemitraan merupakan bentuk baru hubungan kerja pada revolusi industri 4.0 yang hingga saat ini belum ada pengaturan hukumnya secara khusus. Pelaksanaan perjanjian kemitraan sangat tidak seimbang bagi mitra pengemudi, karena perjanjian dirancang oleh perusahaan penyedia aplikasi dalam bentuk kontrak baku. Penulis menyarankan kepada Pemerintah untuk merevisi Undang-undang No.13 tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada mitra pengemudi. 
Batasan Hukum Keterbukaan Data Medis Pasien Pengidap Covid-19: Perlindungan Privasi VS Transparansi Informasi Publik Rahandy Rizki Prananda
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.v3i1.8000

Abstract

Persebaran infeksi virus  Covid-19 telah mengalami peningkatan sejak temuan kasus pertama. Wacana pembukaan akses data rekam medis Pasien Positif Covid-19 menimbulkan pro kontra dalam  masyarakat. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perspektif sejumlah regulasi dalam memandang status data rekam medis,  bentuk perlindungan hukum dan implikasinya , serta solusi hukum untuk praktek yang diterapkan melalui studi komparatif dengan negara lain. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normative dengan pendekatan Undang-Undang , konseptual dan perbandingan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa  Data rekam medis merupakan hak  pribadi individu yang bersifat rahasia dan terbatas . Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi data rekam medis pasien belum komprehensif . Guna mengantisipasi peningkatan penularan Virus Covid-19, Praktik penggunaan data pribadi pasien diterapkan oleh beberapa  negara  sesuai prinsip proporsionalitas , necessities dan purposive limitation.
THE URGENCY OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION AS A LEGAL PROTECTION INSTRUMENT TOWARD TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN INDONESIA Pulung Widhi Hari Hananto; Rahandy Rizki Prananda
LAW REFORM Vol 15, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (157.988 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v15i1.23355

Abstract

Traditional knowledge products characterized by geographical conditions are economically and spiritually valuable assets for the people of the area. Potential misleading of geographical indication goods requires a legal instrument that provides protection. Geographical Indication (GI) is one of the instruments of intellectual wealth that has its own characteristics. This study aims to examine the regulations of GeograpicaI Indication in the national and international levels, the implications of geographical indications for stakeholders and the ideal form of setting geographical indications in Indonesia. This study uses normative juridical methods and comparative studies. The results of the study show that the GI’s regulation applied in Indonesia adheres to a system of merging with brand regulation. The implications of GI’s registration bring a comprehensive impact on the economy and the legitimacy of traditional knowledge. After reviewing the comparison of the protection of geographical indications in Ethiopia and Jamaica, the authors recommend to separate the arrangements for geographical indications with brands (sui generis)
LEGAL POLITICAL OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARK PROTECTION REVIEWED FROM DEVELOPMENT OF TRADEMARK LAW IN INDONESIA TO AVOID FRAUDULENT COMPETITION Moch Alfi Muzakki; Kholis Roisah; Rahandy Rizki Prananda
LAW REFORM Vol 14, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (115.257 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v14i2.20865

Abstract

The achievement of a Trademark in order to become famous is not an easy job, the obstacle of building a Trademark into a well-known trademark is a factor that encourages the emergence of fraudulent competition that is detrimental to others. The Issuance  of Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications is deemed unable to accommodate fraudulent competition. This study aims to examine the law politics of famous Trademark protection in terms of the development of Trademark law in Indonesia and to compare the protection of famous Trademarks in Indonesia with other countries to avoid fraudulent competition in the use  Trademarks. This study is applied a normative juridical approach. The results of the study show that even though Indonesia has made  amendment toward Trademark Law (UUM) 5 times, there is no specific definition of a well-known brand within  Indonesia. Indonesia does not yet have arrangements regarding fraudulent competition in the brand, even though Indonesia has anti-competition laws, but fraudulent competition in Indonesia does not use it as a legal basis.Keywords: Trademark; Well-Known Trademark;  Fraudulent Competition.
Co-Authors Kholis Roisah Moch Alfi Muzakki Pulung Widhi Hari Hananto Zil Aidi