Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGEMBANGAN LKPD MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ARGUMENT DRIVEN INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN LITERASI SAINS SISWA Novitasari Novitasari; Dhila Linggar Lentika; M. Hilmi Zaqqi Asfiyah; Dhella Rochmatul Maghfiroh; Setyo Admoko
ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (320.786 KB) | DOI: 10.31764/orbita.v8i1.8412

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini digunakan untuk mengetahui validitas dan kepraktisan LKPD (Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik) menggunakan model pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry untuk meningkatkan keterampilan literasi sains. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian pengembangan LKPD yang menggunakan metode ADDIE (Analysis, design, develop, implement, evaluate) dengan siswa kelas X SMA pada semester ganjil tahun ajaran 2021/2022. Pada tahapan validasi LKPD dilakukan oleh dua dosen pendidikan fisika, diperoleh sebesar 85,04% dimana masuk pada kategori sangat valid. Pada tahapan kepraktisan dengan mengimplementasi menggunakan LKPD, diperoleh sebesar 96% dimana masuk pada kategori sangat praktis. Pada tahapan implementasi menggunakan metode ADDIE, diperoleh skor N-gain sebesar 0,81 dimana masuk  pada kategori tinggi. Kemudian didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa LKPD model Argument Driven Inquiry ini telah memenuhi standar valid, praktis dan efektif dalam peningkatan keterampilan literasi sains siswa. Kata kunci: literasi sains; LKPD; model pembelajaran ADI ABSTRACTThis study was used to determine the validity and practicality of the student worksheet (LKPD) using the Argument Driven Inquiry learning model to improve the developed scientific literacy skills. This research is a type of LKPD development research that uses the ADDIE method (Analysis, design, develop, implement, evaluate) with class X SMA students in the odd semenster of the 2021/2022 academic year. At the stage of LKPD validation carried out by two physics education lecturers, it was obtained that 85.04% was included in the very valid category. At the practical stage by implementing using LKPD, 96% was obtained which was in the very practical category. At the implementation stage using the ADDIE method, an N-gain score of 0.81 was obtained which was in the high category. Then it was concluded that the LKPD of the Argument Driven Inquiry model had met the valid, practical and effective standards in improving students' scientific literacy skills. Keywords: science literacy; LKPD; ADI learning model
Development of Newton Gravity Student Worksheets on Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve Students' Scientific Argumentation Skills Dhila Linggar Lentika; Setyo Admoko
Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram Vol 10, No 3: July 2022
Publisher : IKIP Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (918.903 KB) | DOI: 10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5349

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, practicability, and efficiency of student worksheets for improving students' scientific argumentation skills on the topic of Newton's Law of Gravity. This study was conducted using the 4-D method, which consists of four stages of research: define, design, develop, and disseminate. It is restricted to the development stage in this study. The validity of the student worksheets was analysed based on aspects of content feasibility, guidelines, questions, scientific argumentation skills, and the Problem Based Learning model achieved an overall percentage of 93.75 %, 100 %, and 95.83 % respectively. 100 %, 100 %, 100 %. The practical aspect of student worksheets is analyzed based on the students' feedback in terms of the student worksheets component, Problem Based Learning model, enthusiasm, Newton's Law of Gravity topic, and scientific argumentation, with an average of 86 %, 82 %, 91.5 %, 88.5 %, and 88 % with robust criteria, respectively. The effectiveness of the student worksheets was determined using the outcomes of the scientific argumentation test's pretest and posttest, and they met the criteria for being very effective. The given test received an average n-gain score of 0.7342 in the interpretation category. Based on the research findings of the data analysis for validity, practicability, and effectiveness, it is possible to conclude that the student worksheets developed are feasible and effective in improving students' argumentation skills. Student worksheets based on a similar Problem Based Learning model could be designed to improve students' argumentation skills on other physics topics.