Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Lumbung Inovasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Empiricism Journal Bakti Sekawan : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Siti Rabiatul Adawiyah
Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi

 1 
Kualitas Peer Assessment sebagai Assessment Formatif Siti Rabiatul Adawiyah; Nofisulastri Nofisulastri
Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Vol 8, No 2 (2020): December
Publisher : Department of Biology Education, FSTT, Mandalika University of Education, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/bjib.v8i2.3159

Abstract

This study aims to produce a suitable peer assessment instrument as a formative assessment. This type of research is development research, because it develops a peer assessment instrument. The development of the peer assessment instrument refers to the Borg & Gall development model which includes 10 stages, namely: 1) a preliminary study; 2) planning; 3) development of a product initiation model; 4) reviewing the initiation model of the product; 5) revision; 6) limited trials; 7) revised trial results; 8) wide-scale trials; 9) final product revision; and 10) dissemination. However, in this study only up to stage 8, while stage 9 and stage 10 were not carried out due to time and conditions that did not allow. Expert validation was carried out beforehand before limited testing and wide-scale trials in Class X Madrasah Aliyah An-Najah, Al-Halimy Education Foundation, Sesela, Gunungsari District, West Lombok Regency. The results showed that the logical validity of the peer assessment instrument was very good, with an average score of 3.7. The results of the analysis using the product moment correlation test to determine the empirical validity of the peer assessment showed that the empirical validity of the peer assessment was in the high category (0.94; 0.96; 0.97; and 0.97). Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that peer assessment was of good quality as a formative assessment.
Co-Authors Agus Muliadi Armansyah Armansyah Dorkas Wini Ngailo Ika Nurani Dewi Intan Kusuma Wardani Intan Kusuma Wardani Masiah Masiah Muhamad Sarifuddin Muhammad Sarifuddin Nofisulastri Nofisulastri Nofisulastri Nofisulastri Nofisulastri Septiana Dwi Utami Taufik Samsuri