Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
R. Rahaditya
Universitas Tarumanagara
Aerospace Engineering Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
PERAN POLA PENGASUHAN ORANGTUA TERHADAP SIKAP NASIONALISME REMAJA Agoes Dariyo; R. Rahaditya
Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Vol 9, No 1 (2017): Provitae
Publisher : Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (428.392 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/provitae.v9i1.529

Abstract

Aim of this research is to know the differences of nationalism based on the parenting style. There are 121 adolescents involve in the research. Data collecting by questionarries such as parenting style and nationalism. Anova, regression and correlation are used to analysis the data. The result is, there are differences nationalism based on the parenting style (F = 3.236, p = . 043 < .05). There is correlation between authoritative parenting style and nationalism (r = .405(**), p = .000 < . 01). There is no correlation between authoritarian parenting style and nationalism (r = . 0,190, p = .810 > .05), and there is correlation between permissive parenting style and nationalism (r = . 377, P = . 0283 < .05). Beside, there is the role of authoritative parenting style on the nationalism (r2 = . 164, t = 4542, p= .000 < .01). Score r2 = . 164 means the contribution of authoritative parenting style on the nationalism is 16. 4 % and the other factors wich contribute on the nationalism is 83.6 %.Keywords: parenting style, nationalism, and adolescence.
PERAN POLA PENGASUHAN ORANGTUA TERHADAP SIKAP NASIONALISME REMAJA Agoes Dariyo; R. Rahaditya
Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Vol. 9 No. 1 (2017): Provitae: Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan
Publisher : Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/provitae.v9i1.529

Abstract

Aim of this research is to know the differences of nationalism based on the parenting style. There are 121 adolescents involve in the research. Data collecting by questionarries such as parenting style and nationalism. Anova, regression and correlation are used to analysis the data. The result is, there are differences nationalism based on the parenting style (F = 3.236, p = . 043 < .05). There is correlation between authoritative parenting style and nationalism (r = .405(**), p = .000 < . 01). There is no correlation between authoritarian parenting style and nationalism (r = . 0,190, p = .810 > .05), and there is correlation between permissive parenting style and nationalism (r = . 377, P = . 0283 < .05). Beside, there is the role of authoritative parenting style on the nationalism (r2 = . 164, t = 4542, p= .000 < .01). Score r2 = . 164 means the contribution of authoritative parenting style on the nationalism is 16. 4 % and the other factors wich contribute on the nationalism is 83.6 %.Keywords: parenting style, nationalism, and adolescence.
Land Deed Officials Responsibility for Sale and Purchase Deeds That Made Unlawfully (Review Decision of Wonogiri State Court Number 13/PDT.G/2021/PN Wng) Lorraine Anggi Taruli Hutagalung; R. Rahaditya
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 3 No. 7 (2023): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v3i7.860

Abstract

This study aims to discusses the Land Deed Officials (PPAT) which has the authority to issue/ issue authentic deeds for the parties, especially in the process of transferring land rights through buying and selling, where authentic deeds have perfect evidentiary power. However, in the case that the authors discuss below, there is an abuse of authority in carrying out their duties as a PPAT. The PPAT in carrying out its duties in the form of making authentic deeds must be carried out carefully and thoroughly. The responsibility of the PPAT for the cancellation of the sale and purchase deed due to an unlawful act in the Wonogiri District Court Decision Number 13/PDT.G/2021/PN Wng., in the decision it is explained that the PPAT has violated the law as a result of not fulfilling the legal terms of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. This type of research is normative juridical, using qualitative data analysis methods, while to examine legal problems, primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials are used, which are then analyzed descriptively analytically.The consequence of a sale and purchase deed that is null and void because it contains legal defects is that the AJB is considered to be null and void or has never existed so that all legal actions related to the AJB are null and void and have no legal force.
Analisis Sengketa Kepemilikan Merek Bensu (Studi pada Merek Geprek Bensu Melawan I Am Geprek Bensu) Levira Leo Gunawan; R. Rahaditya
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (280.208 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i6.12759

Abstract

This study has the objective of examining and analyzing disputes over the ownership of the Bensu brand and legal protection efforts in the Geprek Bensu case against I Am Geprek Bensu, which in this study discusses cases of intellectual property rights in the trademark field. This research uses a normative juridical approach with secondary, primary and tertiary data. The results of this study are that: the Geprek Bensu dispute originated from business similarities between Geprek Bensu owned by Ruben Onsu and I Am Geprek Bensu owned by PT Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono where Ruben claimed Bensu was his business; the Bensu case is that there was trademark protection out of good faith and the registration system at that time adhered to first to file, which meant that the first recipient was the one who was protected; there are many similarities between the two types of brands Bensu and Ruben were judged to have plagiarized I Am Geprek Bensu, and the Supreme Court considered the case and decided that Ruben Onsu's appeal was rejected
Penerapan Prinsip Itikad Baik Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Merek Terkenal yang Tidak Terdaftar di Indonesia Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 600 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2020 Mutia Kirana Aprilia; R. Rahaditya
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Juni 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v7i1.5106

Abstract

Abstract Brands contain the promise of producers to consistently provide certain characteristics, benefits, and services to consumers. Apart from being a symbol of identity, the brand has a price that motivates producers in various ways so that their brands can compete and become popular among the public. Imitation of a well-known mark that is not registered in Indonesia is an example of fraudulent conduct or bad faith in trademark registration. There are legal rules governing the protection of famous brands that are not registered in Indonesia so that the principle of good faith can be applied to avoid losses to brand rights holders and for consumer protection against the purchase of counterfeit branded goods. The case contained in the Supreme Court decision Number 600 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2020 between NILOS GmbH &Co.KG against PT ASIA SANTOSO in the trademark dispute "NILOS"is an example of bad faith in trademark registration in Indonesia. This research uses normative juridical methods using the Statute Approach which then analyzes the cases in the decision and relates them to laws and regulations. Research data is sourced from secondary data in the form of primary legal material and secondary legal material. The data collection method is carried out by literature study, the data obtained are presented using narrative text forms and qualitative normative data analysis methods. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be seen that the Supreme Court Decision Number: 600 K/ Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2020 has provided legal protection for famous brands that are not registered in Indonesia as stipulated in the MIG Law and TRIPS Agreement. The form of legal protection against this is in the form of cancellation of the Defendant's "NILOS"mark from the General Register of Trademarks of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights. The cancellation of the Defendant's "NILOS"mark was due to similarities in essence with the Plaintiff's "NILOS"mark. Keywords: Imitation, Bad Faith, Mark Abstrak Merek mengandung janji produsen untuk secara konsisten memberikan ciri, manfaat, dan jasa tertentu kepada konsumen. Selain sebagai lambang identitas secara ekonomi merek memiliki harga sehingga memotivasi produsen dalam berbagai cara agar mereknya dapat bersaing dan menjadi populer di kalangan masyarakat. Peniruan merek terkenal yang tidak terdaftar di Indonesia adalah contoh perbuatan curang atau itikad tidak baik dalam pendaftaran merek. Adanya aturan hukum yang mengatur perlindungan terhadap merek terkenal yang tidak terdaftar di Indonesia agar prinsip itikad baik dapat diterapkan untuk menghindari kerugian pemegang hak merek dan untuk perlindungan konsumen terhadap pembelian barang bermerek palsu. Kasus yang terdapat dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 600 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020 antara NILOS GmbH & Co.KG melawan PT ASIA SANTOSO dalam sengketa merek “NILOS” merupakan contoh itikad tidak baik dalam pendaftaran merek di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang (Statute Approach) yang kemudian dilakukan analisis terhadap kasus dalam putusan dan mengaitkannya dengan peraturan perundang – undangan. Data penelitian bersumber dari data sekunder yang berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan, data yang diperoleh disajikan dengan menggunakan bentuk teks naratif dan metode analisis data secara normatif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat diketahui bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 600 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020 telah memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terkenal yang tidak terdaftar di Indonesia sebagaimana diatur dalam UU MIG dan TRIPS Agreement. Bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap tersebut berupa pembatalan merek “NILOS” milik Tergugat dari Daftar Umum Merek Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Pembatalan merek “NILOS” milik Tergugat dikarenakan terdapat persamaan pada pokoknya dengan merek “NILOS” milik Penggugat. Kata Kunci: Peniruan, Itikad Tidak Baik, Merek
Analisis Pro dan Kontra Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelenggaraan Sistem Keadilan di Indonesia R. Rahaditya; Cora Venessa; Okthavianes Paulina; Eudora Joyce Hiumawan; Erland Jovian
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v7i2.5627

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini menyoroti kurangnya efektivitas penyelenggaraan pemerintahan dan pengadilan di Indonesia yang mendorong resolusi dalam mengadopsi Restorative Justice sebagai solusi lebih efektif dalam penyelesaian perkara peradilan. Namun solusi ini dipandang memiliki sisi baik dan sisi buruknya juga. Penelitian memunculkan pandangan pro dan kontra dalam masyarakat hukum. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yuridis dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach), peneliti mengkaji implementasi Restorative Justice secara menyeluruh. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Restorative Justice berfokus pada pendekatan pemulihan daripada pembalasan. Meskipun demikian, penerapannya belum sepenuhnya berhasil dalam lingkup peradilan di Indonesia. Terdapat dua pandangan yang kuat: Pro Restorative Justice menyebutkan manfaatnya dalam menyelesaikan Over Capacity di lapas, menciptakan keadilan monodualistik, dan meningkatkan efisiensi penegak hukum. Sementara itu, pihak kontra berpendapat bahwa Restorative Justice berpotensi memberi peluang bagi pelaku untuk mengulangi tindak pidana, kurang memberikan perlindungan kepada korban, dan minim pemahaman masyarakat terhadap konsepnya. Kata Kunci: Restorative Justice, Pro-Kontra, Keadilan & Peradilan Abstract This research highlights the lack of effectiveness of government and court administration in Indonesia which encourages resolutions in adopting Restorative Justice as a more effective solution in resolving judicial cases. However, this solution is seen as having both good sides and bad sides. Research raises views of the pros and cons in the legal community. Research uses the normative juridical research methods with a statutory approach and a case approach, where researchers examine the implementation of Restorative Justice as a whole. The research results show that Restorative Justice focuses on a recovery approach rather than retaliation. However, its implementation has not been completely successful in the judiciary in Indonesia. There are two strong views: Pro-Restorative Justice states its benefits in resolving overcapacity in prisons, creating monodualistic justice, and increasing the efficiency of law enforcement. Meanwhile, opposing parties argue that Restorative Justice has the potential to provide opportunities for perpetrators to repeat criminal acts, provides less protection for victims, and lacks public understanding of the concept. Keywords: Restorative Justice, Pro-Con, Justice & Judiciary
Over Kapasitas pada Lembaga Permasyarakatan (Lapas) Nethan; Meylane Carmelia Manek; Agnellya Hendarmin Santoso; R. Rahaditya
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v7i2.5650

Abstract

Abstrak Kriminalitas merupakan tindakan yang melanggar hukum yang dapat menyebabkan gangguan kestabilan sosial. Salah satu bentuk pidana adalah penjara di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) yang bertujuan memperbaiki narapidana. Namun, banyak Lapas di Indonesia menghadapi Over Kapasitas, di mana mereka melebihi daya tampung. Kajian ini mengidentifikasi penyebab over kapasitas di Lapas, seperti kurangnya patuh masyarakat terhadap hukum, penahanan sebelum persidangan, dan penggunaan pidana penjara untuk pelaku narkoba. Faktor-faktor ini menciptakan situasi berbahaya di Lapas, mempengaruhi pemulihan narapidana, dan melanggar hak mereka.Dampak dari over kapasitas mencakup masalah keamanan, kenyamanan, dan peningkatan tindak kriminal di dalam Lapas. Oleh karena itu, solusi yang diusulkan adalah mempertimbangkan alternatif untuk pidana penjara dan mengedepankan pendekatan keadilan restoratif. Pendekatan ini telah berhasil diimplementasikan oleh kepolisian dalam beberapa kasus. Dengan demikian, kajian ini berharap memberikan pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang masalah over kapasitas di Lapas dan memberikan dasar untuk menguranginya di Indonesia Kata Kunci: Over Kapasitas, LAPAS, Hukuman Alternatif, Pemulihan Restoratif Abstract Criminality involves actions that violate legal norms, leading to social disruption. One form of punishment is incarceration in Correctional Institutions (Lapas), aimed at rehabilitating inmates. However, many Lapas in Indonesia are facing overcapacity issues, exceeding their holding capacity. This study identifies the causes of overcapacity in Lapas, such as societal non-compliance with the law, pretrial detentions, and the use of imprisonment for drug offenders. These factors create dangerous conditions in Lapas, affecting inmate rehabilitation and violating their rights. The consequences of overcapacity include security and comfort issues and an increase in criminal activities within Lapas. Therefore, the proposed solution is to consider alternatives to imprisonment and prioritize a restorative justice approach. This approach has been successfully implemented by the police in various cases. Thus, this study aims to provide a better understanding of the overcapacity issue in Lapas and serves as a foundation for reducing it in Indonesia. Keywords: Overcapacity, Correctional Institutions, Alternative Sentencing, Restorative Justice
Co-Authors Agnellya Hendarmin Santoso Agoes Dariyo Cora Venessa Erland Jovian Eudora Joyce Hiumawan Levira Leo Gunawan Lorraine Anggi Taruli Hutagalung Meylane Carmelia Manek Mutia Kirana Aprilia Nethan Okthavianes Paulina