Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Omsk State University Dostoevsky, Omsk, Russia

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

The Quality of Literature on Jurisprudence as the Most Important Prerequisite for the Formation of a Modern Lawyer Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, May
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v5i2.1282

Abstract

Believing that high-quality literature on jurisprudence is the most important prerequisite for the training of practicing lawyers, the author, based on an analysis of one of the textbooks, shows that the former often does not meet the relevant requirements. In conclusion, it is emphasized that the problem under consideration remains relevant at the present time and its solution necessarily requires positive moral responsibility of both authors of educational literature and responsible editors and reviewers.
To The Problem of Law-Making Errors: A General Theoretical Aspect Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov; Muhammad Ridwan
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 5 No 3 (2025): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, August
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v5i3.1334

Abstract

The article examines the problems of law-making legal errors. Particular attention is paid to the subjective side of the law-making error, as well as the legal consequences of their commission. The article also draws attention to the consequences of law-making errors that affect the interests of the population, causing corruption and disrespect for the law. From the author's point of view, law-making errors should be differentiated from doctrinal (conceptual) errors.
Methodological Principles of Knowledge of the State and Law Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov; Muhammad Ridwan
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 5 No 3 (2025): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, August
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v5i3.1335

Abstract

This scientific article is devoted to the problems of methodological principles of knowledge of the state and law. In particular, the question of whether they are elements of the methodology of knowledge of state and legal phenomena is considered. Particular attention is paid to one of these principles, such as objectivity. Examples from domestic legislation that do not correspond to it are demonstrated.
Features of Judicial Law-Making in the Russian Federation and Its Acts: General Theoretical Aspect Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov; Muhammad Ridwan
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 5 No 4 (2025): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, November
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v5i4.1382

Abstract

The scientific article analyzes various features of judicial law-making from the perspective of its supporters, as well as the objective and subjective reasons for its occurrence in the Russian Federation. In the context of this article, the controversial issue of acts of judicial lawmaking is considered. Particular attention is focused on the concept and features of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
About The Problems of Types of Understanding Law Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 5 No 4 (2025): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, November
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v5i4.1386

Abstract

Noting that law is a highly multifaceted concept, this article focuses on the issue of types of legal understanding. Critically assessing the positions of Russian scholars on the classification of these types, the paper offers the author's perspective on this theoretical issue. It also critically analyzes the positions of theoretical scholars on the relationship between philosophical and natural law types of legal understanding, as well as the integrative type and broad understanding of law.
Corruption Factors and Discretion of the Law Enforcement Agency Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov; Muhammad Ridwan
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 5 No 4 (2025): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, November
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v5i4.1402

Abstract

The article analyzes the corruption-generating factors enshrined in official legal documents—the Federal Law of the Russian Federation "On Anti-Corruption Expertise of Regulatory Legal Acts and Draft Regulatory Legal Acts" dated June 17, 2009, and the Methodology for Conducting Anti-Corruption Expertise of Regulatory Legal Acts and Draft Regulatory Legal Acts" approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated February 26, 2010. Particular attention is paid to such a corruption-generating factor as the wide margin of discretion (breadth of discretionary powers) of the law enforcement agency. In this regard, the discretion of the subjects of the law enforcement process is analyzed, the necessity, significance, as well as both subjective and objective limits of it are argued. With regard to the former, it is substantiated that the latter should be considered not as the legal consciousness or professional culture of the subjects of law enforcement, but their professional culture. Objective limits are determined by optional legal norms containing evaluative concepts. As an example, several provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are cited, which necessarily presuppose the discretion of law enforcement agencies in the law enforcement sphere.