Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bulletin of Civil Engineering
Puji Harsanto
Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Limpasan Langsung Metode SCS Menggunakan Data Hujan TRMM Studi Kasus Subdas Code Hulu Puji Harsanto; Muhammad Sufyan Tsaury
Bulletin of Civil Engineering Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Agustus
Publisher : Civil Engineering Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/bce.v1i2.12417

Abstract

Availability of sufficient data as input data is important. Data availability tends to have several data problems, such as the lack of data availability, incomplete data, or the number of stations that are less scattered. As the development of the technology problems, those probelms can be solved by replacing ground-based observation data with satellite observations that have high spatial and temporal resolution, wide area coverage, fast access, and economics. This research was conducted to validate and correct TRMM satellite data on observation data at the AWLR Gemawang station with the SCS Method. The results of this study showed a delay in the average measurements of satellite rainfall and surface approximately 8.5 hours based on the data analysis used in this study. The results of the model error analysis can be concluded that TRMM rainfall data can be used in these needs. However, there is still an error in the TRMM data, which is on the data of January 18, 2018 which results in a hydrograph (Ew) waveform error of 11.843. From the conformity index and efficiency analysis, TRMM satellite data gets the correlation coefficient average ARR-AWLR debit of 0,2416 which is categorized as low efficiency data and TRMM-AWLR of 0,1041 which is categorized as quite low coefficient data, while the efficiency coefficient gets an average value 1,67 which is categorized as highly efficient optimization data. 
Co-Authors Muhammad Sufyan Tsaury