Astika Nurhayati Saputri
Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

HISTORY, SCOPE, METHODS OF EDUCATION PSYCHOLOGY IN STUDENTS IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT Tiara Nur Cahyani; Astika Nurhayati Saputri; Ina Magdalena
PROGRES PENDIDIKAN Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/prospek.v2i3.152

Abstract

SDN Poris Pelawad 1 is a school located in one of the areas in Tangerang City, precisely in Poris Pelawad Village. Since the covid-19 outbreak, which requires all Indonesian citizens and even all over the world to apply WFH (Work Form Home) where the continuity of teaching and learning is also carried out online (In the Network) using media that we already recognize with the term zoom meeting or other media that saves usage. internet package, so that students in the learning process will produce a good ending. Learning is basically a process of interaction between educators and students, both direct (face-to-face) and indirect (learning activities using learning media in web applications). In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, teaching and learning activities are recommended to use an online learning model. The government has also provided assistance to students and educators in an effort to provide a free quota of 50GB every month, the level of the amount of the quota depends on the level of education as well, starting from elementary, junior high, high school to college, why is there a need for differences in the amount of quota distribution. Because each level requires different power, the higher the level of majority education, the more power needs that must be spent to achieve something that is expected. This study used an interview method to one of the teachers of SDN Poris Pelawad 1. The interview was conducted directly / offline by approaching the resource person.
Penerapan Model Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Materi Bangun Datar Dan Bangun Ruang Di Kelas V SDN Karet 2 Kabupaten Tangerang Astika Nurhayati Saputri; Adeline Rosere Roulia; Rizki Zuliani
Bersatu: Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika Vol 1 No 4 (2023): Juli : Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika
Publisher : LPPM Politeknik Pratama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/bersatu.v1i4.266

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of the Discovery Learning model in increasing learning motivation and learning outcomes of students in mathematics learning on flat and geometric shapes in class V SDN Karet 2, Tangerang Regency. The Discovery Learning method combines exploratory and knowledge construction approaches, which involve students actively in the learning process. This researcher is a Classroom Action Research (PTK) which is carried out in two cycles with the stages of each cycle consisting of planning, implementing actions, observing, and reflecting. The research subjects were 18 students in class V at SDN Karet 2, Tangerang Regency. Methods of data collection through observation, questionnaires, tests, and documentation were then analyzed using descriptive qualitative consisting of data reduction, data presentation and data verification stages. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the application of the Discovery Learning model can increase learning motivation and students' mathematics learning outcomes in the materials of Spatial Shapes and Flat Shapes. Prior to being subjected to action, the average student learning motivation scored below the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) that had been determined by the school, which was more than 75 or in other words incomplete. In cycle I, the average student motivation increased to at least 80% of the total number of students who had a high category of motivation to learn Mathematics (≥75). At least 80% of the total number of students achieves the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) set by the school, which is 80. If the above success indicators have been achieved, cycle I has been successful and there is no need to proceed to the next cycle. However, if problems are still found that have not been resolved, then the action process is repeated in the next cycle by going through the same stages as cycle I, starting from planning, repeating actions, observing/collecting data so that existing problems can be resolved.